<vie> hello, can someone help me? how to mine solo with GPU?

You can use some pool miners with something like daemon+tcp://127.0.0.1 instead of stratum+tcp

They don't all support that.

<vie> yes, I try with xmrig but got some error

<vie> xmrig.exe --daemon

<vie> ok, it work for me. only primary account support not sub-address. I'll study monero address. thanks.

Hi, I was wondering if anybody knows if bohemianpool.com supports the new CPU algo...

kiwi_8: looking at their latest block, it doesn't look like they've updated their daemon yet

asymptotically ok, screw patriotism then :D can you recommend some pool that's ready? I got couple spare Xeons for burn testing =)

supportxmr.com has updated but they're the biggest pool so i'd avoid it

most/all of the pools listed near the top of miningpoolstats.stream/monero are updated. just avoid minergate and you're good :)

I wanted to support the Dutch, but seems I'll have to go with French as those are ready for CPU :)

On what block randomx switch happens?

Perkol: 1978433

Thanks

has monero switched to randomx yet?

no.

boredguy: <monerobux> The current block height is 1,978,273. Fork height is 1,978,433. 160 blocks to go, happening in approximately 0.22 days.

about 5 hours. hope the ASICs are crying.

ASICs are ded.

were there any asics for this round anyhow

doubt it tbh

you never know.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

manifest, theres been no overt examples of ASICs but we'll probably find out at the switchover if theres a huge sustained drop at fork time as asics wont be able to immediately switch over.

tfw someone has designed a randomx asic all along and is now just waiting, rubbing his hands together

tfw when someone has finally finished their cryptonight/R ASIC design, with only days/hours before it becomes obsolete

i hope its the latter yes

wtf i just got my asics back from the fab lab and they are worthless now. where can i speak to the ceo of monero? he needs to undo this silly fork

:D

10 bucks monero soon?!

?

more like 1.

why so?

why not?

weird, I still cant update my ledger nano

cos take a look at dash 55 bucks all time low this year

mn cost 55k now

firmware at 1.5.5 and monero at Version 1.3.1

i want dash to go down to 1 bucks so i can buy an mn

>wanting to buy dash

kys.

kthx byeee.

arf updating now, irc is like the magic rubber duck

well, there are people like with spare cpu's just waiting for fork

so i guess its gonna come back up sooner or later

>his botnet doesn't know how to update the miners

ishygddt

next fork in 3.6 hours!!

my poor asics are doomed

my abacus is ready

nioc!

wonderfulsox!

nioc: :-*

how's the kitty and granddaughter sir?

everyone is fine thx

:-D

good trip

ready for randomX party?

yep, at least the fork isn't at 4am like last time

lol.

what just not a bagholder?

how does it feel that you could've sell your mn for 1.5m$

and now it worth trah

NWAAAAaahahahh4AhaHAHhaHhaHHaaAhAhHAahAHhaha4AhAHA

]BFG[: sir?

want some water?

uhhh

ehh

Do you guys remember the BFG 9000 from Doom?

yes I have built a real one thats what I use to smash kitties into pieces in the neighborhood

drilling cats eyes out with screwdriver and putting them into the microwave was not fun enough

CPU mining - Can't wait. It feels like in 2010. I mined Bitcoin with my Intel Pentium. I have sold all my Bitcoin for 1.5m$ and bought Monero now. XD

wow u rich

Was just kidding around, because of the troll. XD

But i did CPU mining , but with ltc.

y'all think its safe for me to switch over the the moneroworld node that hasn't been upgrade yet?

everyones getting the daemon not compatible and we point em to it

i guess i can wait until right before the fork

333 blocks to go

sry 33

.status

.fork

The current block height is 1,978,402. Fork height is 1,978,433. 31 blocks to go, happening in approximately 0.04 days.

that's a lot of days

is that a ruby bot?

where is a countdown? :D

In "status" in monerod.

YouTube Title: Monero Coffee Chat (Upgrade Special) - 2019.11.30 Views: 125 Length: Uploaded: 2019-11-27 User: Monero Community Workgroup Likes: 15 Dislikes: 0

.fork

Height: 1978417/1978417 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 278.12 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 16 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 29m 43s

30 minutes eta til fork.

Test

RandomX in how many minutes?

~28 minutes

status

Height: 1978407/1978407 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.58 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 26 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 13m 26s

status

Height: 1978415/1978415 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 277.30 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 18 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 27m 50s

status

Height: 1978417/1978417 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 278.12 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 16 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 29m 43s

status

Height: 1978418/1978418 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.96 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 15 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 31m 7s

status

Height: 1978420/1978420 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.84 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 13 blocks), up to date, 7(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 33m 22s

status

Height: 1978421/1978421 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.45 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 12 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 36m 22s

please don't spam

But i did CPU mining , but with ltc.

one more to go

Height: 1978432/1978432 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 273.93 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 1 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 53m 59s

This is exciting

Height: 1978433/1978433 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 272.91 MH/s, v12 (forking now), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 54m 56s

Happy hardfork

Horray!

[2019-11-30 19:57:49.125] rx init datasets algo rx/0 (8 threads) seed 993ba25f61d47e1e...

19:57:49.126] rx -- allocated 4416 MB huge pages 0% 0/2208 (1 ms)

woop woop !!

Getting 1400 H/s on my CPU feels weird lol

champagne

yeay!!

congrats :)

everything is working?

did moneroocean update? I'm still mining on cn/r

Barolo time!

1978436/1978436 (100.0%) on mainnet, mining at 935 H/s

BAROLOS ALL AROUND

.barolo

My Windows 0.15.0.0 daemon needed a restart to start mining RandomX, but never mind :)

:O

better upgrade tho

Wooooooo

<GuzmanPintos> Luxor EU is hashing!

<dd1982> Height: 1978437/1978437 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 270.95 MH/s, v12, up to date, 8(out)+48(in) connections, uptime 0d 1h 13m 18s

<dd1982>

<dd1982> Doesn't it seem strange that net hash is pretty much exactly the same post-fork? I would have expected a large jump?

Takes a while to adjust

<dd1982> Ah - I figured it was maybe based on some moving average...

It is.

xmrmatterbridge it is

600 blocks with an offset moving average

kiwi_8 difficulty change in 600 blocks?

congratulations everybody

1200 minutes, estimated?

Is it me or have hashrates just multiplied by 3 ?

KiloLima no, it adjusts over 600 blocks, over time gradually

xmrpool.net is now doing 3x the hashrate it was 15 mins ago

The hashrate is reducing 1MH/s per block or two.

according to the status check

Unless they've forked XMR Legacy?

I havnt upgraded pool mining clients for a months or so, was there a fork ?

Yes. Today.

and no hashrate change associated with the new fork ?

Incorrect.

cbr update your miner asap

The blocks are coming quite nicely, no?

loads of blocks yep. and accepted by the pool. I'd have thought they'd be rejected if the miners were on an old algorithm ?

unless it's the pool confused on the old fork and tripled the hashrate somehow

cbr: Well, I mean the found blocks on the blockchain. Last hardfork, when we shed ASICs, I think it took nearly one hour to find the first post-fork block ...

YouTube Title: Bang the Drum All Day (2015 Remaster) Views: 814,917 Length: 3:39 Uploaded: 2016-02-27 User: Todd Rundgren - Topic Likes: 6,773 Dislikes: 266

was the fork algorithm pushed to xmriig in the last month or so ?

Yes, it's updated for RandomX I think

seems my newer compiled miners are doing silly hashrates and the old ones may be getting rejected but even the new ones are a months or so old

better get compiling 8 servers worth of xmrig's then lol

A RandomX hashrate is 10 times or so higher than a CN/R hashrate

use xmrig >= v5

So hashrate should increase by x10 from 270MH/s or 300MH/s.

I'll just compile from the lates git pull

to 3,000MH/s

I think more like x3 to x10, depending on hw.

cbr If i were you, i'd use a branch, since master may not be stable.

My solo-mining daemon went up from 30, 40 to over 500. Maybe I am especially lucky! I will find a block any time now :)

Or maybe you were just right.

recompiling my dual e5-2690, used to do 1000h/s, cant wait :)

<dd1982> KiloLima: I think most of the GPUs that were mining pre-fork will get pulled from the network since they're not likely to be profitable now - so where we end up depends on how much hash rate came from GPUs that get pulled and how large the share of hash that CPUs have and how many new CPU's come online now...

I'm wondering once the dust has settled if returns for minings will actually be more with the higher hashrates once everyone is getting them

all right, explorer working..... supernode updated.......

i think i have a pruned node somewhere though

<dd1982> I guess with time it'll revert to roughly the same amount of energy spent vs. price of rewards so profitability is not likely to change... If monero is very profitable a lot of CPU time will be shifted to mining XMR.. but in the short term those who got an especially nice bump in hashrate should be more profitable than usual - especially us Ryzen-owners since the new Ryzens mine like beasts. My hardware at home was getting real old

Whatever it it it runs really well on 5450 xeons, 5650 xeons and e5 xeons

looking at a jump from 4kh/s to over 15kh/s

still got loads to recompile though

oh good lord. i think this daemon is managed with upstart. i forget that syntax

wow. the monerod in /bin/ is v0.10.3.1 .... long live warptangent

Hashrate jumping, blocks comin in a lot faster 👌🏻

The dual E5-2690 has gone from 800-1000H/s to 4500-5000H/s nice

thats as much as the other 8 56 series xeons and the 54 xeons were doing put together lol

messingfred[m] that should make my first day of mining more profitable :D

And my last 4 years a waste of electricity :)

it will adjust over 3 - 4 days; hopefully you don't need to write off some expensive GPUs

I don't have GPU's, just a tonne of xeons

up to 20kh/s so far from 4kh/s and about 5 hosts to go

which going by the rest will be 1500-2kh each so looking at 30kh/s cpu only

I have one old dual xeon running

2,5 Kh/s

5660 ?

model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz

[2019-11-30 21:04:02.879] speed 10s/60s/15m 2434.0 2434.3 2431.6 H/s max 2435.2 H/s

my laptop does 750 H/s

my e5-2690 is doing 5kh/s

dual

higher clock speed?

I have 2x 4 Core

I dont do laptops they tend to melt :)

I am just benchmarking :D

just a later architecture xeon i think

how many cores you have?

ah the 2690 is 10 core

so 20 with hyperthereding

miner does not benefit from HT

L3 cache is big too

yep

135 / 80 W though

<dd1982> kiwi_8: Mine sure mines a lot more using 16 threads vs 8 threads on 8 cores...

interesting, I tried with AMD I have and the difference is less than 10%

(Old AMD)

All mine are under vmware

cbr that's some expensive licenses... :) I run it alongside a KVM host

unlimited licence from my old company that went out of business. think it cost about £600 5 years ago

my pool jumped from like nr. 3 to nr. 1 :D

hashrate seems dependant on what else the L3 cache is doing on other vm's

<dd1982> ~/RandomX/build$ ./randomx-benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --avx2 --init 8 --threads 8 --nonces 100000

<dd1982> RandomX benchmark v1.1.5

<dd1982> - Argon2 implementation: AVX2

<dd1982> - full memory mode (2080 MiB)

<dd1982> - JIT compiled mode

<dd1982> - hardware AES mode

<dd1982> - large pages mode

<dd1982> Initializing (8 threads) ...

ones just mining are loads more hashes

<dd1982> Memory initialized in 2.96579 s

<dd1982> Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...

<dd1982> Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...

<dd1982> Calculated result: f35a269c763e9ef175708a5099c2c30ea25f6cb26fe79b0049d96846f5fbfd47

<dd1982> Performance: 5967.76 hashes per second

<dd1982> ~/RandomX/build$ ./randomx-benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --avx2 --init 16 --threads 16 --nonces 100000

<dd1982> RandomX benchmark v1.1.5

Don't spam or get kicked.

<dd1982> - Argon2 implementation: AVX2

<dd1982> - full memory mode (2080 MiB)

<dd1982> - JIT compiled mode

<dd1982> - hardware AES mode

<dd1982> - large pages mode

<dd1982> Initializing (16 threads) ...

<dd1982> Memory initialized in 1.99911 s

<dd1982> Initializing 16 virtual machine(s) ...

<dd1982> Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...

<dd1982> Calculated result: f35a269c763e9ef175708a5099c2c30ea25f6cb26fe79b0049d96846f5fbfd47

<dd1982> Performance: 7887.71 hashes per second

<dd1982> ~25% difference with HT threads here...

nice

<dd1982> On Zen 2 - so have loads of L3..

Hehe enjoy :)

xmrpool.net is struggling to deliver blocks quick enough now lol

Poor xmrpool.

I take it a wallet upgrade is required as well ?

I think it's not strictly needed, but I'm not 100% sure off the top of my head.

Oh, maybe just to ensure the RPC with the daemon goes smoothly.

Yes, I the 0.15 GUI refused to transact with 0.14 daemons, which caused some grief for ... people using remote daemons

daemons that were not yet updated, that is

Remote as in... other people's right ? Not theirs but over the network ?

Yes. Your favorite setup :)

Just making sure I don't need to care ^_^

Maybe a little schadenfreude?

It seems we will have too many blocks for quite a while now, current block time maybe hoover around one minute or so

1978508 - difficulty adjustment will start catching on

Yeah right, with so many blocks it will adjust sooner. Almost perfect.

pool payouts should be much more regular too

I'm sure it'll change but my hashrate is currently 1/10 of xmrpool.net rather than 1/100th it is normally :)

hrm, the randomx source code link the explorer isn't working for mainnet

Hello

Happy fork day :)

dd1982: what CPU is that?

Any estimates of the true global hashrate yet ?

looking at how much faster last 100 blocks are, compared to 2 minute block time, I'd guess 477 MH/s

Thanks!

How long roughly does it take, for diffculty to adjust (mostly) ?

sorry, miscalculation - 530 and rising

Alright, thanks

well, if we immediately moved from old hashrate to the new hashrate, then it would take about 75 blocks before we saw it rise, and it would rise over the next day

but you also have delays in getting the new stable hash rate - as some miners were not updated in time etc

so I expect the actual hashrate will keep on rising for a while - somewhat ocmpensated by GPUs being taken offline as they get less profitable

<GuzmanPintos> .