02:16:45 <xmrmatterbridge> <vie> hello, can someone help me? how to mine solo with GPU?
02:28:19 <moneromooo> You can use some pool miners with something like daemon+tcp://127.0.0.1 instead of stratum+tcp
02:28:36 <moneromooo> They don't all support that.
02:33:37 <xmrmatterbridge> <vie> yes, I try with xmrig but got some error
02:33:48 <xmrmatterbridge> <vie> xmrig.exe --daemon
02:43:00 <xmrmatterbridge> <vie> ok, it work for me. only  primary account support not sub-address. I'll study monero address. thanks.
11:49:40 <kiwi_8> Hi, I was wondering if anybody knows if https://bohemianpool.com/ supports the new CPU algo...
11:50:17 <asymptotically> kiwi_8: looking at their latest block, it doesn't look like they've updated their daemon yet
11:52:10 <kiwi_8> asymptotically ok, screw patriotism then :D  can you recommend some pool that's ready? I got couple spare Xeons for burn testing =)
11:52:59 <asymptotically> supportxmr.com has updated but they're the biggest pool so i'd avoid it
11:53:15 <asymptotically> most/all of the pools listed near the top of https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero are updated. just avoid minergate and you're good :)
11:56:05 <kiwi_8> I wanted to support the Dutch, but seems I'll have to go with French as those are ready for CPU :)
12:38:42 <Perkol> On what block randomx switch happens?
12:42:44 <asymptotically> Perkol: 1978433
12:43:00 <Perkol> Thanks
13:31:39 <boredguy> has monero switched to randomx yet?
13:33:36 <rottensox> no.
13:33:52 <rottensox> boredguy: <monerobux> The current block height is 1,978,273. Fork height is 1,978,433. 160 blocks to go, happening in approximately 0.22 days.
13:35:10 <boredguy> about 5 hours. hope the ASICs are crying.
13:35:19 <rottensox> ASICs are ded.
13:36:23 <manifest> were there any asics for this round anyhow
13:36:28 <manifest> doubt it tbh
13:36:58 <rottensox> you never know.
13:37:09 <rottensox> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
13:57:07 <ferretinjapan> manifest, theres been no overt examples of ASICs but we'll probably find out at the switchover if theres a huge sustained drop at fork time as asics wont be able to immediately switch over.
13:58:22 <manifest> tfw someone has designed a randomx asic all along and is now just waiting, rubbing his hands together
14:02:19 <hyc> tfw when someone has finally finished their cryptonight/R ASIC design, with only days/hours before it becomes obsolete
14:02:58 <manifest> i hope its the latter yes
14:04:55 <asymptotically> wtf i just got my asics back from the fab lab and they are worthless now. where can i speak to the ceo of monero? he needs to undo this silly fork
14:07:10 <hyc> :D
15:05:17 <]BFG[> 10 bucks monero soon?!
15:06:12 <zelest> ?
15:06:40 <rottensox> more like 1.
15:07:02 <zelest> why so?
15:07:39 <rottensox> why not?
15:08:36 <coppa> weird, I still cant update my ledger nano
15:08:56 <]BFG[> cos take  a look at dash 55 bucks all time low this year
15:09:02 <]BFG[> mn cost 55k now
15:09:11 <coppa> firmware at 1.5.5 and monero at Version 1.3.1
15:09:14 <]BFG[> i want dash to go down to 1 bucks so i can buy an mn
15:09:36 <rottensox> >wanting to buy dash
15:09:36 <rottensox> kys.
15:09:39 <rottensox> kthx byeee.
15:13:13 <coppa> arf updating now, irc is like the magic rubber duck
15:20:07 <boredguy> well, there are people like with spare cpu's just waiting for fork
15:20:33 <boredguy> so i guess its gonna come back up sooner or later
15:20:40 <manifest> >his botnet doesn't know how to update the miners
15:20:45 <manifest> ishygddt
15:25:45 <oyntgkuapzhbyzr[> next fork in 3.6 hours!!
15:26:16 <oyntgkuapzhbyzr[> my poor asics are doomed
15:43:53 <nioc> my abacus is ready
15:49:57 <rottensox> nioc!
15:50:38 <nioc> wonderfulsox!
15:51:47 <rottensox> nioc: :-*
15:51:56 <rottensox> how's the kitty and granddaughter sir?
15:52:13 <nioc> everyone is fine thx
15:52:17 <rottensox> :-D
15:52:23 <nioc> good trip
15:52:25 <rottensox> ready for randomX party?
15:52:56 <nioc> yep, at least the fork isn't at 4am like last time
15:53:02 <rottensox> lol.
16:07:24 <]BFG[> what just not a bagholder?
16:07:37 <]BFG[> how does it feel that you could've sell your mn for 1.5m$
16:07:46 <]BFG[> and now it worth trah
16:07:52 <]BFG[> NWAAAAaahahahh4AhaHAHhaHhaHHaaAhAhHAahAHhaha4AhAHA
16:08:00 <rottensox> ]BFG[: sir?
16:08:09 <rottensox> want some water?
16:34:11 <slave_blocker> uhhh
16:35:07 <rottensox> ehh
16:47:37 <nonie> Do you guys remember the BFG 9000 from Doom?
16:49:48 <]BFG[> yes I have built a real one thats what I use to smash kitties into pieces in the neighborhood
16:50:12 <]BFG[> drilling cats eyes out with screwdriver and putting them into the microwave was not fun enough
17:12:58 <nonie> CPU mining - Can't wait. It feels like in 2010. I mined Bitcoin with my Intel Pentium. I have sold all my Bitcoin for 1.5m$ and bought Monero now. XD
17:13:49 <louipc> wow u rich
17:14:31 <nonie> Was just kidding around, because of the troll. XD
17:15:04 <nonie> But i did CPU mining , but with ltc.
17:42:16 <gingeropolous> y'all think its safe for me to switch over the the moneroworld node that hasn't been upgrade yet?
17:42:26 <gingeropolous> everyones getting the daemon not compatible and we point em to it
17:42:33 <gingeropolous> i guess i can wait until right before the fork
17:58:50 <kiwi_8> 333 blocks to go
17:59:28 <kiwi_8> sry 33
18:01:23 <KiloLima> .status
18:01:26 <KiloLima> .fork
18:02:00 <KiloLima> The current block height is 1,978,402. Fork height is 1,978,433. 31 blocks to go, happening in approximately 0.04 days.
18:02:49 <q9fmc> that's a lot of days
18:03:29 <q9fmc> is that a ruby bot?
18:04:01 <kiwi_8> where is a countdown? :D
18:04:53 <moneromooo> In "status" in monerod.
18:18:24 <kiwi_8> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz_xiU_x9bs&feature=youtu.be
18:18:24 <LobsterMan> YouTube Title: Monero Coffee Chat (Upgrade Special) - 2019.11.30 Views: 125 Length: Uploaded: 2019-11-27 User: Monero Community Workgroup Likes: 15 Dislikes: 0
18:31:23 <veikko> .fork
18:32:46 <KiloLima> Height: 1978417/1978417 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 278.12 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 16 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 29m 43s
18:34:18 <KiloLima> 30 minutes eta til fork.
18:36:34 <randomXcellence> Test
18:36:56 <randomXcellence> RandomX in how many minutes?
18:37:15 <spedex> ~28 minutes
18:39:36 <KiloLima> status
18:39:36 <KiloLima> Height: 1978407/1978407 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.58 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 26 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 13m 26s
18:39:36 <KiloLima> status
18:39:36 <KiloLima> Height: 1978415/1978415 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 277.30 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 18 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 27m 50s
18:39:36 <KiloLima> status
18:39:36 <KiloLima> Height: 1978417/1978417 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 278.12 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 16 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 29m 43s
18:39:36 <KiloLima> status
18:39:37 <KiloLima> Height: 1978418/1978418 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.96 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 15 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 31m 7s
18:39:37 <KiloLima> status
18:39:38 <KiloLima> Height: 1978420/1978420 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.84 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 13 blocks), up to date, 7(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 33m 22s
18:39:38 <KiloLima> status
18:39:39 <KiloLima> Height: 1978421/1978421 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 276.45 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 12 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 36m 22s
18:41:19 <ErCiccione[m]> please don't spam
18:48:02 <nonie> But i did CPU mining , but with ltc.
18:56:45 <kiwi_8> one more to go
18:57:04 <KiloLima> Height: 1978432/1978432 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 273.93 MH/s, v11 (next fork in 1 blocks), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 53m 59s
18:57:28 <ProjectEpsilon> This is exciting
18:58:00 <KiloLima> Height: 1978433/1978433 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 272.91 MH/s, v12 (forking now), up to date, 8(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 1d 8h 54m 56s
18:58:10 <Seb__> Happy hardfork
18:58:19 <ProjectEpsilon> Horray!
18:58:29 <kiwi_8> [2019-11-30 19:57:49.125]  rx   init datasets algo rx/0 (8 threads) seed 993ba25f61d47e1e...
18:58:29 <kiwi_8> 19:57:49.126]  rx   -- allocated 4416 MB huge pages   0% 0/2208 (1 ms)
18:58:38 <nevvton[m]> woop woop !!
18:59:46 <ProjectEpsilon> Getting 1400 H/s on my CPU feels weird lol
19:01:07 <binaryFate> champagne
19:01:23 <nevvton[m]> yeay!!
19:01:53 <Nebraskka> congrats :)
19:02:04 <kiwi_64> everything is working?
19:02:52 <oyntgkuapzhbyzr[> did moneroocean update? I'm still mining on cn/r
19:02:52 <ErCiccione[m]> Barolo time!
19:03:14 <spedex> 1978436/1978436 (100.0%) on mainnet, mining at 935 H/s
19:04:06 <randomXcellence> BAROLOS ALL AROUND
19:04:12 <Nebraskka> .barolo
19:05:32 <rbrunner> My Windows 0.15.0.0 daemon needed a restart to start mining RandomX, but never mind :)
19:05:46 <louipc> :O
19:06:23 <louipc> better upgrade tho
19:07:27 <randomXcellence> Wooooooo
19:11:37 <xmrmatterbridge> <GuzmanPintos> Luxor EU is hashing!
19:14:01 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Height: 1978437/1978437 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 270.95 MH/s, v12, up to date, 8(out)+48(in) connections, uptime 0d 1h 13m 18s
19:14:01 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>
19:14:03 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Doesn't it seem strange that net hash is pretty much exactly the same post-fork? I would have expected a large jump?
19:14:41 <randomXcellence> Takes a while to adjust
19:14:56 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Ah - I figured it was maybe based on some moving average...
19:15:12 <moneromooo> It is.
19:15:14 <kiwi_8> xmrmatterbridge it is
19:15:38 <kiwi_8> 600 blocks with an offset moving average
19:16:09 <KiloLima> kiwi_8 difficulty change in 600 blocks?
19:16:11 <sudakan> congratulations everybody
19:16:20 <KiloLima> 1200 minutes, estimated?
19:16:30 <cbr> Is it me or have hashrates just multiplied by 3 ?
19:16:47 <kiwi_8> KiloLima no, it adjusts over 600 blocks, over time gradually
19:17:14 <cbr> xmrpool.net is now doing 3x the hashrate it was 15 mins ago
19:17:15 <KiloLima> The hashrate is reducing 1MH/s per block or two.
19:17:26 <KiloLima> according to the status check
19:17:39 <KiloLima> Unless they've forked XMR Legacy?
19:18:26 <cbr> I havnt upgraded pool mining clients for a months or so, was there a fork ?
19:18:42 <moneromooo> Yes. Today.
19:19:07 <cbr> and no hashrate change associated with the new fork ?
19:19:20 <moneromooo> Incorrect.
19:19:29 <sudakan> cbr update your miner asap
19:20:01 <rbrunner> The blocks are coming quite nicely, no?
19:20:51 <cbr> loads of blocks yep. and accepted by the pool. I'd have thought they'd be rejected if the miners were on an old algorithm ?
19:21:42 <cbr> unless it's the pool confused on the old fork and tripled the hashrate somehow
19:23:53 <rbrunner> cbr: Well, I mean the found blocks on the blockchain. Last hardfork, when we shed ASICs, I think it took nearly one hour to find the first post-fork block ...
19:24:02 <KiloLima> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO17hN-YvBc
19:24:03 <LobsterMan> YouTube Title: Bang the Drum All Day (2015 Remaster) Views: 814,917 Length: 3:39 Uploaded: 2016-02-27 User: Todd Rundgren - Topic Likes: 6,773 Dislikes: 266
19:24:53 <cbr> was the fork algorithm pushed to xmriig in the last month or so ?
19:25:24 <rbrunner> Yes, it's updated for RandomX I think
19:25:29 <cbr> seems my newer compiled miners are doing silly hashrates and the old ones may be getting rejected but even the new ones are a months or so old
19:25:50 <cbr> better get compiling 8 servers worth of xmrig's then lol
19:26:11 <rbrunner> A RandomX hashrate is 10 times or so higher than a CN/R hashrate
19:26:20 <sudakan> use xmrig >= v5
19:26:36 <KiloLima> So hashrate should increase by x10 from 270MH/s or 300MH/s.
19:26:40 <cbr> I'll just compile from the lates git pull
19:26:46 <KiloLima> to 3,000MH/s
19:26:48 <moneromooo> I think more like x3 to x10, depending on hw.
19:27:27 <sudakan> cbr If i were you, i'd  use a branch, since master may not be stable.
19:28:21 <rbrunner> My solo-mining daemon went up from 30, 40 to over 500. Maybe I am especially lucky! I will find a block any time now :)
19:29:39 <moneromooo> Or maybe you were just right.
19:33:36 <cbr> recompiling my dual e5-2690, used to do 1000h/s, cant wait :)
19:34:22 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> KiloLima: I think most of the GPUs that were mining pre-fork will get pulled from the network since they're not likely to be profitable now - so where we end up depends on how much hash rate came from GPUs that get pulled and how large the share of hash that CPUs have and how many new CPU's come online now...
19:34:43 <cbr> I'm wondering once the dust has settled if returns for minings will actually be more with the higher hashrates once everyone is getting them
19:40:00 <gingeropolous> all right, explorer working..... supernode updated.......
19:40:40 <gingeropolous> i think i have a pruned node somewhere though
19:40:46 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> I guess with time it'll revert to roughly the same amount of energy spent vs. price of rewards so profitability is not likely to change... If monero is very profitable a lot of CPU time will be shifted to mining XMR..  but in the short term those who got an especially nice bump in hashrate should be more profitable than usual - especially us Ryzen-owners since the new Ryzens mine like beasts. My hardware at home was getting real old
19:42:30 <cbr> Whatever it it it runs really well on 5450 xeons, 5650 xeons and e5 xeons
19:42:51 <cbr> looking at a jump from 4kh/s to over 15kh/s
19:42:59 <cbr> still got loads to recompile though
19:45:15 <gingeropolous> oh good lord. i think this daemon is managed with upstart. i forget that syntax
19:48:40 <gingeropolous> wow. the monerod in /bin/ is v0.10.3.1 .... long live warptangent
19:52:52 <messingfred[m]> Hashrate jumping, blocks comin in a lot faster 👌🏻
19:53:35 <cbr> The dual E5-2690 has gone from 800-1000H/s to 4500-5000H/s nice
19:54:09 <cbr> thats as much as the other 8 56 series xeons and the 54 xeons were doing put together lol
19:57:19 <kiwi_8> messingfred[m] that should make my first day of mining more profitable :D
19:57:59 <cbr> And my last 4 years a waste of electricity :)
19:58:49 <kiwi_8> it will adjust over 3 - 4 days; hopefully you don't need to write off some expensive GPUs
20:01:52 <cbr> I don't have GPU's, just a tonne of xeons
20:02:19 <cbr> up to 20kh/s so far from 4kh/s  and about 5 hosts to go
20:03:17 <cbr> which going by the rest will be 1500-2kh each so looking at 30kh/s cpu only
20:03:21 <kiwi_8> I have one old dual xeon running
20:03:29 <kiwi_8> 2,5 Kh/s
20:04:02 <cbr> 5660 ?
20:04:43 <kiwi_8> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
20:05:08 <kiwi_8> [2019-11-30 21:04:02.879] speed 10s/60s/15m 2434.0 2434.3 2431.6 H/s max 2435.2 H/s
20:05:31 <kiwi_8> my laptop does 750 H/s
20:05:45 <cbr> my e5-2690 is doing 5kh/s
20:05:49 <cbr> dual
20:06:10 <kiwi_8> higher clock speed?
20:06:17 <kiwi_8> I have 2x 4 Core
20:06:17 <cbr> I dont do laptops they tend to melt :)
20:06:28 <kiwi_8> I am just benchmarking :D
20:06:31 <cbr> just a later architecture xeon i think
20:06:56 <kiwi_8> how many cores you have?
20:06:58 <cbr> ah the 2690 is 10 core
20:07:12 <cbr> so 20 with hyperthereding
20:07:26 <kiwi_8> miner does not benefit from HT
20:07:36 <cbr> L3 cache is big too
20:07:42 <kiwi_8> yep
20:08:16 <kiwi_8> 135 / 80 W though
20:09:54 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> kiwi_8: Mine sure mines a lot more using 16 threads vs 8 threads on 8 cores...
20:10:36 <kiwi_8> interesting, I tried with AMD I have and the difference is less than 10%
20:10:42 <kiwi_8> (Old AMD)
20:11:59 <cbr> All mine are under vmware
20:15:32 <kiwi_8> cbr that's some expensive licenses... :)  I run it alongside a KVM host
20:16:28 <cbr> unlimited licence from my old company that went out of business.  think it cost about £600 5 years ago
20:16:29 <kiwi_8> my pool jumped from like nr. 3 to nr. 1 :D
20:18:10 <cbr> hashrate seems dependant on what else the L3 cache is doing on other vm's
20:18:11 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> ~/RandomX/build$ ./randomx-benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --avx2 --init 8 --threads 8 --nonces 100000
20:18:12 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> RandomX benchmark v1.1.5
20:18:13 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - Argon2 implementation: AVX2
20:18:14 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
20:18:16 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - JIT compiled mode
20:18:17 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - hardware AES mode
20:18:18 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - large pages mode
20:18:20 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Initializing (8 threads) ...
20:18:20 <cbr> ones just mining are loads more hashes
20:18:21 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Memory initialized in 2.96579 s
20:18:22 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
20:18:24 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
20:18:25 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Calculated result: f35a269c763e9ef175708a5099c2c30ea25f6cb26fe79b0049d96846f5fbfd47
20:18:26 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Performance: 5967.76 hashes per second
20:18:28 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> ~/RandomX/build$ ./randomx-benchmark --mine --jit --largePages --avx2 --init 16 --threads 16 --nonces 100000
20:18:29 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> RandomX benchmark v1.1.5
20:18:29 <moneromooo> Don't spam or get kicked.
20:18:30 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - Argon2 implementation: AVX2
20:18:31 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
20:18:33 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - JIT compiled mode
20:18:34 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - hardware AES mode
20:18:35 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982>  - large pages mode
20:18:37 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Initializing (16 threads) ...
20:18:38 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Memory initialized in 1.99911 s
20:18:39 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Initializing 16 virtual machine(s) ...
20:18:42 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
20:18:42 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Calculated result: f35a269c763e9ef175708a5099c2c30ea25f6cb26fe79b0049d96846f5fbfd47
20:18:45 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> Performance: 7887.71 hashes per second
20:18:57 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> ~25% difference with HT threads here...
20:19:17 <kiwi_8> nice
20:20:18 <xmrmatterbridge> <dd1982> On Zen 2 - so have loads of L3..
20:22:14 <messingfred[m]> Hehe enjoy :)
20:27:34 <cbr> xmrpool.net is struggling to deliver blocks quick enough now lol
20:28:43 <Snipa> Poor xmrpool.
20:38:28 <cbr> I take it a wallet upgrade is required as well ?
20:40:08 <moneromooo> I think it's not strictly needed, but I'm not 100% sure off the top of my head.
20:40:51 <moneromooo> Oh, maybe just to ensure the RPC with the daemon goes smoothly.
20:41:51 <rbrunner> Yes, I the 0.15 GUI refused to transact with 0.14 daemons, which caused some grief for ... people using remote daemons
20:42:32 <rbrunner> daemons that were not yet updated, that is
20:43:08 <moneromooo> Remote as in... other people's right ? Not theirs but over the network ?
20:43:37 <rbrunner> Yes. Your favorite setup :)
20:43:49 <moneromooo> Just making sure I don't need to care ^_^
20:44:09 <rbrunner> Maybe a little schadenfreude?
20:44:24 * moneromooo looks suitably guilty
20:45:44 <rbrunner> It seems we will have too many blocks for quite a while now, current block time maybe hoover around one minute or so
20:47:18 <sech1> 1978508 - difficulty adjustment will start catching on
20:48:21 <rbrunner> Yeah right, with so many blocks it will adjust sooner. Almost perfect.
20:50:24 <cbr> pool payouts should be much more regular too
20:51:59 <cbr> I'm sure it'll change but my hashrate is currently 1/10 of xmrpool.net rather than 1/100th it is normally :)
21:06:24 <gingeropolous> hrm, the randomx source code link the explorer isn't working for mainnet
22:28:54 <guzman> Hello
22:33:30 <kim0> Happy fork day :)
22:34:08 <Inge-> dd1982: what CPU is that?
22:34:21 <kim0> Any estimates of the true global hashrate yet ?
22:34:46 <Inge-> looking at how much faster last 100 blocks are, compared to 2 minute block time, I'd guess 477 MH/s
22:35:16 <kim0> Thanks!
22:36:55 <kim0> How long roughly does it take, for diffculty to adjust (mostly) ?
22:38:37 <Inge-> sorry, miscalculation - 530 and rising
22:38:47 <kim0> Alright, thanks
22:39:31 <Inge-> well, if we immediately moved from old hashrate to the new hashrate, then it would take about 75 blocks before we saw it rise, and it would rise over the next day
22:39:58 <Inge-> but you also have delays in getting the new stable hash rate - as some miners were not updated in time etc
22:40:20 <Inge-> so I expect the actual hashrate will keep on rising for a while - somewhat ocmpensated by GPUs being taken offline as they get less profitable
22:46:42 <xmrmatterbridge> <GuzmanPintos> .