the newest pinodexmr can be downloaded from magnet:?xt=urn:btih:bdfdf0ef3b94e4a8aa15dd2a0ed17aafb0243d74&dn=PiNodeXMR-v4.21.01.zip&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337%2fannounce

oh raspberry pi, odroid 4 life

giggles

hello

so many ppl here

which channel can I ask about the rpc daemon and its functionality ?

this one

nice, thanks

:)

I've setup a daemon and using RPC from another machine

it bans the ip from the other machine after a bit

where can I find the conditions that would trigger that ?

or even better, a log entry saying why

Set log level 1, it should tell you.

moenrod set_log 1

ta, trying it out

I'm not familiar with why RPC, rather than P2P, gets banned though. I assume there's a message.

in the log it just says ip and banned

get_bans shows it in the list

can unban it with set_bans

but comes back

are you sure you're connecting to rpc port 18081, and not p2p port 18080?

have to wait a bit for it to break, restarted the daemon

yes

its restricted as well

it only started doing it in the last week or so

first saw it on testnet daemon

that seems really weird. i also didn't think bans had anything to do with RPC, only P2P

RPC can ban.

It's rare though.

is it the same ban list, applies to both P2P and RPC?

IIRC yes.

I looked. It's for... what seems to be forks by lamers not changing network id or the like.

is there any special case that would prevent 127.0.0.1 from being banned? if so, an ssh tunnel could be a quick n easy workaround

Probably not.

d'oh

not banned yet, but network id might be the cause

running 2 gui on different machines and switching between main and test checking stuff

so maybe multiple failed attempts by the gui to open/refresh wallets might be causing it

by default, testnet & stagenet run on totally different ports (28080, 28081, 38080, 38081...)

so it shouldn't be too easy to accidentally connect a testnet client to a mainnet daemon, or vice versa

yes, but when opening a mainnet wallet, you have to change the node port in config seperate

in the gui that is

if you forget, suppose this is what happens

gotcha. i'm not familiar with the GUI to be quite honest. i know the CLI and RPC wallets will automatically use the right port if you specify --testnet or --stagenet

I'll keep an eye on the logs, but thanks, the info really helped

another question about the restricted ports

The wallet will check when loading a wallet file that the testnet/mainnet/stagenet matches.

scenario: one instance, default restricted on 18081 and unrestricted on 48081

when I run ./monerod status with the daemon in background

on the same machine as daemon, it seems to connect to restricted and I can't issue any usefull commands

yeah. it connects to 18081 by default, which in your case is restricted

can I point it to 48081 ?

to unban etc ?

FWIW, most people leave 18081 for unrestricted (localhost only) and use 18089 for restricted (0.0.0.0)

if you prefer not to do that, you can do ./monerod --rpc-bind-port=48081 status

two options, great

just make sure whatever your unrestricted port is is only bound on localhost, so it's not reachable from other machines.

yip, I remotely manage it but use fw to block the port

partly why the numbers are swapped

yeah, you can do it with firewall also. as long as you're sure you know what you're doing :)

personally i use an ssh tunnel to access the unrestricted RPC remotely, leaving it bound to 127.0.0.1 only

i think there is also an option to enable user/password authentication.

thanks for the quick replies and useful info!

np. hope your banning problem goes away once you've got the port #s sorted

it will probably go away as soon as I stop testing :)

lol.

you're supposed to be able to set it up with tls+username/pw

so, log level 1 shows the last call and then blocked, not the reason. However, think I managed to repo the cause

I can open a testnet wallet with the gui if it has no password and the node points to a mainnet daemon

suppose the daemon doesn't like that after a couple of calls

and then bans

as moneromooo pointed out, the gui will block opening a tesnet wallet, but looks like it only does so if the wallet has a password

the tls/password stuff is for the rpc connection

including wallet connections

moneroyay: oof, sounds like a bug for sure

CLI wallet will refuse to open it, password or not

thanks h2017

moneroyay: if you make an issue about it here github.com/monero-project/monero-gui i'm sure it would be appreciated

ta, first defect log so will have to get familiar with the process

suppose nobody would use blank password for mainnet wallets, hence why not that big a deal :)

Any guesses about how 2022 atomic swap volume will compare to btc/xmr bisq pair volume?

it should make bisq redundant

the question probably should be asked on #monero-markets though

bisq will still provide a good marketplace for trading

id imagine

i.e., you still need a place for people to post bids and asks, and bisq is nicely already set up for that. atomic swaps just removes the need for whatsitcalled

arbiter.... envoy.... middleman....

yes you are right. i thought it would be good if recent atomic swap prices could be broadcast over the p2p network

if the whole experience could somehow be decentralised

oh that could be interesting

i guess on the bitcoin chain the prices could be stored in cleartext so there's actual truth

the prices don't have to be stored on any blockchain

just broadcast

it's strictly volatile information

somefunny business might happen with malicious nodes but that's to be expected

nodes should ignore highly discrepant information

well thats the problem with permissionless p2p networks

you can't trust any peer blindly

Revuo Issue 90 - revuo-monero.com/issue-90.html

if protonmail accepted monero, id switch from mullvad

<Beags[m] "if protonmail accepted monero, i"> ivpn.net started accepting monero

I am thinking about switching to it, when my mullvad sub ends.

<mechanic41turk[m "I am thinking about switching to"> Ivpn also offers wireguard. I think protonvpn still offers openvpn only

protonvpn is ages behind of mullvad and ivpn.

mullvad and ivpn only requires one to generate an account number. They don't require name, email address, etc.

Protonvpn, generally since it is connected to your protonmail, and since protonmail still requires some credit card to be saved to their system, knows your name, ID, bank acc, etc.

which is really invasive for a vpn service.

I am too. I wish we could fast forward a year to see what the world looks like!

Why lie about something that can be easily disproven? monerologs.net/monero/20201207#c165563 - github.com/fireice-uk/cryptonote-speedup-demo/blob/master/ecops64/ecops64-c.c#L4 Why steal from your community and then laugh at them? reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/6d5yt5/what_fluffypony_just_did_is_not_ok Reason is the same - to laugh at morons that are gullible enough to believe you and repeat you

r lies.

<johnhus007 "Why lie about something that can"> thanks, just bought more monero.

please don't feed the trolls Adamas[m]

test

test failed Adamas[m]

ah, that decision of whether to mess with SSN scammers on the phone....

“I thought, ‘I’m going to pump it and dump it,’ because I was interested and taking the ideas and implementing them in bitcoin. The bitcoin code base was far more interesting to me than monero, and I thought, ‘I’m not going to work on this codebase, it’s terrible,'” he recalls - fluffypony in interview about Monero

> “I thought, ‘I’m going to pump it and dump it,’ because I was interested and taking the ideas and implementing them in bitcoin. The bitcoin code base was far more interesting to me than monero, and I thought, ‘I’m not going to work on this codebase, it’s terrible,'” he recalls - fluffypony in interview about Monero

*yawn*

* >

“I thought, ‘I’m going to pump it and dump it,’ because I was interested and taking the ideas and implementing them in bitcoin. The bitcoin code base was far more interesting to me than monero, and I thought, ‘I’m not going to work on this codebase, it’s terrible,'” he recalls - fluffypony in interview about Monero

>

troll moar.

You can ignore, it's a known stalker, not even trying to be honest.

guess he's running out of material

hello rotten :)

hello all

how long should it take to synchroniz for the first time after creating a wallet

Fast ryzen + SSD: maybe... 6-8 hours. Spinning HDD: a week.

It depends on which wallet you use, if it connects to a remote node or runs local node

wich is faster

and if i use a remote node can you recommend a node to use

:)

monero24.nsa.gov

ahah

node.supportxmr.com:18081

nice

but your own node is recommended

(they basically all point to it anyway)

ha ha very funny

lol

:)

lol dice

How can I join monero-dev from Matrix(Element)?

software is hard.

!sh -c "irssi" ?

I'm not cool enough to use irssi :(

You see, IRC is like two boats meeting in the middle of the ocean

and I don't have a boat

fluffydonkey: ^

All IRC channels are bridged to Matrix natively.

Great. I wasn't sure how to get that URL

hey monero

what do you think about this libregit.org/GVRN/GVRNspec

any feedback is appreciated

Cheers

. ¦3<RELATIVISM: is there a TL;DR?

^

Monero is great. The seeds generated by the native wallet can also be used in something like Cake Wallet. I am assuming it's a standard, as opposed to the fractured nature of bitcoin seed generation for different clients and implementations.

Possibly. Not all wallets generate the same seed type.

The main offender was mymonero, but old versions only. There's a new 14 word system now that's probably going to take over.

AFAIK trezor and/or ledger use a different system again.

<fluffydonkey[m] ". ¦3<RELATIVISM: is there a TL;"> fluffydonkey: thanks for the feedback I removed the WIP bits until its ready so it is not to long

updated in libregit.org/GVRN/GVRNspec/src/branch/master/README.md

Cheers

👍️ I'd personally start off with a problem statement, and then potentially a summary of the solution, and then dive into the motivation and detailed solution

sounds good will consider that

documentation is defenately not my strenght so critic is allways apreciated