-
sgp_
jonathancross: I can't handle that unfortunately
-
niocbrrrrrr
-
jonathancross
<luigi1111w "my understanding is CLSAG has a "> luigi1111w: thanks!
-
jonathancross
Sorry, wrong quoted text. Was thanking for atomic swap CCS.
-
h4sh3d[m]
luigi1111w: thanks!
-
h4sh3d[m]
freenode_jonf3n[m]: thanks
-
jonathancross
h4sh3d[m]: Already funded! Next time, please ask for more XMR... the community clearly wants to throw money at you ;-)
-
sgp_
I finally made us a Twitter account:
twitter.com/xmrcommunity
-
jonathancross
<sgp_ "I finally made us a Twitter acco"> Already has a tweet from 2018 :-)
-
sgp_
jonathancross: haha I repurposed an old "Fondajo" account
-
sgp_
Nice catch
-
zkao
i just shared the funding proposal for the atomic swap, and people say they cant donate because funding is already closed... is that correct? you cant go beyond the minimum funding?
-
sarang
^ rehrar sgp_ etc. ?
-
sgp_
definitely a rehrar thing
-
zkao
rehrar: can u please keep the funding open at least over the weekend?
-
luigi1111w
it's a me thing
-
luigi1111w
it's not an open ended donation; you put a specific target
-
zkao
target == minimum funding == maximum funding
-
-
sgp_
I have no idea how I made that /me
-
sarang
CLI == yes
-
sarang
GUI == not yet
-
sarang
someone like TheCharlatan is more qualified to speak to that status than I
-
xmr-pr
[meta] SarangNoether opened issue #472: Research meeting: 10 June 2020 @ 17:00 UTC
-
xmr-pr
-
xmr-pr
[meta] SamsungGalaxyPlayer opened issue #471: Community Workgroup Meeting: 6 June 2020 17:00 UTC
-
xmr-pr
-
luigi1111w
you get what you ask for. No more, no less. Theoretically you could accept less if your proposal isn't getting fully funded and you want to move forward anyway, but that's never happened yet.
-
zkao
h4sh3d: you were wrong saying that was the minimum funding!
-
zkao
luigi1111w: if people keep sending money to that address, will h4sh3d receive the funds or not in the end?
-
luigi1111w
not
-
sarang
Excess goes to general fund?
-
ErCiccione
I haven't really understood that yet
-
sgp_
I wasn't sure either. Some FFS proposals in the past included provisions for excess
-
luigi1111w
it's just been dormant in the CCS wallet up till now. We obviously lose some to fees, but need to do an audit soon to see where we stand and if it makes sense to do something with it
-
luigi1111w
there have rarely been special arrangements yes
-
luigi1111w
charlatan got the full raised amount for his vps thing
-
luigi1111w
and I think benedikt got the extra for bulletproofs
-
niocbrrrrrr
luigi1111w: good that the charlatan got the extra, it was intended
-
kayront
-
kayront
worth a read, all the usual stuff we talk about regarding how important it is for transactions to all look alike etc are validated in the document
-
sgp_
Sadly anyone who reads this is going to have a takeaway that's not quite true or is misleading
-
sgp_
No, Chainalysis and others don't automagically trace funds through Wasabi for all users of it
-
sgp_
But they will just mark the whole pool as higher risk
-
sgp_
So users of it get screwed either way
-
kinghat[m]
👌
-
kinghat[m]
welcome to the future
-
kinghat[m]
search for it in your matrix client