02:10:37 <sgp_> jonathancross: I can't handle that unfortunately
02:24:17 <niocbrrrrrr> jonathancross: https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/h4sh3d-atomic-swap-research.html
11:03:29 <jonathancross> <luigi1111w "my understanding is CLSAG has a "> luigi1111w: thanks!
11:04:37 <jonathancross> Sorry, wrong quoted text. Was thanking for atomic swap CCS.
11:24:04 <h4sh3d[m]> luigi1111w: thanks!
11:24:14 <h4sh3d[m]> freenode_jonf3n[m]: thanks
13:35:02 <jonathancross> h4sh3d[m]: Already funded! Next time, please ask for more XMR... the community clearly wants to throw money at you ;-)
14:53:25 <sgp_> I finally made us a Twitter account: https://twitter.com/xmrcommunity
15:01:44 <jonathancross> <sgp_ "I finally made us a Twitter acco"> Already has a tweet from 2018 :-)
15:04:55 <sgp_> jonathancross: haha I repurposed an old "Fondajo" account
15:05:13 <sgp_> Nice catch
15:13:04 <zkao> i just shared the funding proposal for the atomic swap, and people say they cant donate because funding is already closed...  is that correct? you cant go beyond the minimum funding?
15:14:56 <sarang> ^ rehrar sgp_ etc. ?
15:18:18 <sgp_> definitely a rehrar thing
15:27:06 <zkao> rehrar: can u please keep the funding open at least over the weekend?
15:27:40 <luigi1111w> it's a me thing
15:28:00 <luigi1111w> it's not an open ended donation; you put a specific target
15:33:34 <zkao> target == minimum funding == maximum funding
15:36:17 * sgp_ selsta, others: can you comment on the state of reproducible builds? https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/191
15:36:29 <sgp_> I have no idea how I made that /me
15:39:15 <sarang> CLI == yes
15:39:18 <sarang> GUI == not yet
15:40:08 <sarang> someone like TheCharlatan is more qualified to speak to that status than I
15:45:27 -xmr-pr- [meta] SarangNoether opened issue #472: Research meeting: 10 June 2020 @ 17:00 UTC
15:45:27 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/472
15:45:27 -xmr-pr- [meta] SamsungGalaxyPlayer opened issue #471: Community Workgroup Meeting: 6 June 2020 17:00 UTC
15:45:27 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/471
15:51:49 <luigi1111w> you get what you ask for. No more, no less. Theoretically you could accept less if your proposal isn't getting fully funded and you want to move forward anyway, but that's never happened yet.
15:53:16 <zkao> h4sh3d: you were wrong saying that was the minimum funding!
15:53:45 <zkao> luigi1111w: if people keep sending money to that address, will h4sh3d receive the funds or not in the end?
15:54:01 <luigi1111w> not
15:54:49 <sarang> Excess goes to general fund?
15:55:51 <ErCiccione> I haven't really understood that yet
15:56:52 <sgp_> I wasn't sure either. Some FFS proposals in the past included provisions for excess
15:57:02 <luigi1111w> it's just been dormant in the CCS wallet up till now. We obviously lose some to fees, but need to do an audit soon to see where we stand and if it makes sense to do something with it
15:57:11 <luigi1111w> there have rarely been special arrangements yes
15:57:33 <luigi1111w> charlatan got the full raised amount for his vps thing
15:57:53 <luigi1111w> and I think benedikt got the extra for bulletproofs
16:48:54 <niocbrrrrrr> luigi1111w: good that the charlatan got the extra, it was intended
17:39:31 <kayront> https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/gx1kw6/europol_wasabi_report/
17:40:35 <kayront> worth a read, all the usual stuff we talk about regarding how important it is for transactions to all look alike etc are validated in the document
18:51:44 <sgp_> Sadly anyone who reads this is going to have a takeaway that's not quite true or is misleading
18:52:17 <sgp_> No, Chainalysis and others don't automagically trace funds through Wasabi for all users of it
19:00:42 <sgp_> But they will just mark the whole pool as higher risk
19:00:56 <sgp_> So users of it get screwed either way
20:50:19 <kinghat[m]> 👌
20:50:31 <kinghat[m]> welcome to the future
21:34:10 <kinghat[m]> search for it in your matrix client