-
modul8[m]thanks for that reddit thread ErCiccione
-
viperperidot[m]ErCiccione: Thanks for all the work you are doing, it is much appreciated!
-
oceanus[m]Looking at the CoC, I think they should rename to MoneroSafe.space
-
oceanus[m]bigslim : there was a spam problem earlier
-
viperperidot[m]XD
-
viperperidot[m]That's probably what it will end up being
-
SomeGuyWhen accepting donations with Bitcoin, there are huge privacy incentives to generating a unique, single use address for each donor. Is that the case with Monero as well? Or can I use a static address without revealing 1) How much money has been donated in total, and 2) the addresses that have donated. In other words, is there any reason to hand out
-
SomeGuysingle-use addresses to donors when using Monero?
-
artefactaddress reuse is ok
-
artefactbut recipients will know they are transacting with the same person
-
sethsimmons
-
sethsimmonssgp_ just went over exactly that, SomeGuy
-
sgp_SomeGuy: the main reason to use different addresses is if you need to identify who sent you money
-
moneromoooRecipients do not know they are transacting with the same person (unless probabilistically checking whether the change from the first tx appears in a ring in the second tx, which has false positives *and* false negatives).
-
sgp_(for XMR)
-
yanmaanido you need KYC on localmonero.co?
-
artefactmoneromooo: if you give alice and eve the same xmr address, they will definitely know they are transacting with the same person
-
mmxxx[m]o_0
-
artefactbut for receiving donations this is not a concern
-
moneromoooYes, if they compare, obviously :)
-
artefactthat's what i meant :)
-
SomeGuySounds good. One less thing to worry about. Thanks.
-
yanmaaniit's a shame there's no simple way to make an address in JS
-
yanmaanilike that does the derivation of shared secret in the browser
-
moneromoooOK. We just use recipient differently then.