-
koe
ok I got it to work; basically I had to 'mark the certificate as trusted when connecting to the repo'
-
koe
also I had to change my fork to unprotected in gitlab settings to push to master
-
koe
trying to build to site locally with Jekyll; run into apparently a kramdown parsing issue on this step: Loading translation from file ... /_i18n/en.yml
-
koe
-
koe
at a dead end solving this
-
koe
seems to be a parsing problem here /_plugins/moneropedia.rb:132:in `convert'
-
koe
nvm idk what im saying
-
ErCiccione[m]
koe: what command are you using? It builds fine for me.
-
koe
bundle exec jekyll serve --baseurl '' [from the readme]
-
ErCiccione[m]
make sure is bundle exec jekyll serve --baseurl ''"
-
ErCiccione[m]
note the 2 double quotes at the end koe
-
koe
thanks, changed it; still gives kramdown parsing issue; I tried changing the kramdown version in Gemfile.lock to its most current (v2.1.0) and got "kramdown has no parser to handle the specified input format: GFM"
-
koe
ok kramdown made a new gem kramdown-parser-gfm after v2
-
ErCiccione[m]
that shouldn't be needed. I'm trying to clone in a fresh vm from scratch, let's see what happens
-
koe
ok it's building now, after I changed to kramdown v2.1.0 in the lockfile and added "gem 'kramdown-parser-gfm'" to my Gemfile
-
koe
ok my bad, I just deleted the _posts folder and that solved it (not messing with kramdown)
-
ErCiccione[m]
koe: FYI i didn't find any issue building from scratch. Double check your local configuration
-
ErCiccione[m]
.merges
-
xmr-pr
#1194 #1195 #1197 #1201
-
ErCiccione[m]
.merge+ #1203 #1199
-
xmr-pr
Added
-
ErCiccione[m]
.merge+ #1204
-
xmr-pr
Added
-
koe
going to work on adding the hash to point writeup, what should I put as the title tag e.g. MRL-0001? MRL-SUPP, MRL-HtoP? sarang what do you think?
-
koe
-
sarang
I'd just use the title that the author chose, and the link you provided
-
koe
ok
-
sarang
AFAIK it wasn't published elsewhere
-
koe
yeah I dont want to cite github
-
sarang
Why not?
-
sarang
I don't know of another "canonical home" for that writeup
-
koe
that's why I want to put it on getmonero
-
koe
seems more reliable
-
sarang
I would not feel comfortable doing that without the author's permission
-
koe
do you have contact with shen noether?
-
sarang
I do not
-
koe
the MRL repo is itself a copy of shen's original work..
-
sarang
You're free to make a merge request with the writeup to monero-site (as is anyone); I just don't like the idea of doing so without author permission
-
sarang
However, it's not my decision
-
koe
well if anyone knows how to contact shen Ill see what he says
-
koe
or if this shen.noether⊙gc still works Ill try that
-
sarang
Maybe the library section of monero-site could be used? Then it's not like it's being republished or anything, but simply hosted?
-
sarang
Is that the location you had in mind koe?
-
koe
I was going to use MRL page since Shen was an MRL guy, I can do Library instead if it makes more sense
-
sarang
I dunno, just spitballing here
-
sarang
Again, not up to me
-
koe
might be nice to have an 'extra papers' section in the Library; not sure how hairy copyright could get, but from my point of view everything is free game
-
sarang
What do you mean?
-
koe
like 'here's a list of helpful papers'
-
sarang
By whom? You can't just take random preprints and distribute
-
koe
lol that's what Im saying :p
-
sarang
ok
-
koe
anyway, what about putting an UNPUBLISHED: tag?
-
koe
instead of MRL-0001 or whatever
-
sarang
Those preprint designations are pretty arbitrary
-
sarang
Not sure what would cause a change from "unpublished" to something else
-
sarang
Preprint archives aren't really publication in the traditional sense either
-
koe
I mean for the hash to point writeup
-
koe
here is a sample using imgbb to share image
ibb.co/2qxhsqh
-
koe
btw email sent to shen noether was returned, looks like dead address
-
sarang
I like that presentation
-
sarang
Doesn't imply a new publication
-
koe
ok! thanks :) Ill make the PR
-
ErCiccione[m]
koe: starting the abstract with "I discuss..." is not optimal. Who is "I" to the visitor? I suggest to use more impersonal wording like "discussion about..." and maybe add "by -author-" at the end
-
koe
it's directly out of the document; am I allowed to edit it?
-
sarang
The author uses "I" frequently in the paper
-
sarang
It's fairly nonstandard
-
ErCiccione[m]
i'm afraid that would create some confusion. It also gives the feeling the author themselves published the paper
-
koe
I can change abstract -> summary, and write something decent
-
sarang
Ah, so you mean write a new summary that includes the author name
-
koe
-
sarang
Good summary
-
ErCiccione[m]
That's better IMO
-
koe
updated pr