15:34:34 ok I got it to work; basically I had to 'mark the certificate as trusted when connecting to the repo' 16:53:43 also I had to change my fork to unprotected in gitlab settings to push to master 17:57:57 trying to build to site locally with Jekyll; run into apparently a kramdown parsing issue on this step: Loading translation from file ... /_i18n/en.yml 17:58:05 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52163357/jekyll-systemstackerorr-stack-level-too-deep-on-serve-with-github-pages 17:58:10 at a dead end solving this 18:07:14 seems to be a parsing problem here /_plugins/moneropedia.rb:132:in `convert' 18:09:26 nvm idk what im saying 18:14:55 koe: what command are you using? It builds fine for me. 18:15:28 bundle exec jekyll serve --baseurl '' [from the readme] 18:20:04 make sure is bundle exec jekyll serve --baseurl ''" 18:20:09 note the 2 double quotes at the end koe 18:21:33 thanks, changed it; still gives kramdown parsing issue; I tried changing the kramdown version in Gemfile.lock to its most current (v2.1.0) and got "kramdown has no parser to handle the specified input format: GFM" 18:25:51 ok kramdown made a new gem kramdown-parser-gfm after v2 18:28:20 that shouldn't be needed. I'm trying to clone in a fresh vm from scratch, let's see what happens 18:39:15 ok it's building now, after I changed to kramdown v2.1.0 in the lockfile and added "gem 'kramdown-parser-gfm'" to my Gemfile 19:04:18 ok my bad, I just deleted the _posts folder and that solved it (not messing with kramdown) 20:05:09 koe: FYI i didn't find any issue building from scratch. Double check your local configuration 20:06:33 .merges 20:06:34 -xmr-pr- #1194 #1195 #1197 #1201 20:07:02 .merge+ #1203 #1199 20:07:02 Added 20:15:42 .merge+ #1204 20:15:42 Added 20:16:57 going to work on adding the hash to point writeup, what should I put as the title tag e.g. MRL-0001? MRL-SUPP, MRL-HtoP? sarang what do you think? 20:16:58 https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/blob/master/whitepaper/ge_fromfe_writeup/ge_fromfe.pdf 20:20:16 I'd just use the title that the author chose, and the link you provided 20:21:18 ok 20:21:29 AFAIK it wasn't published elsewhere 20:27:54 yeah I dont want to cite github 20:30:58 Why not? 20:31:19 I don't know of another "canonical home" for that writeup 20:31:29 that's why I want to put it on getmonero 20:31:40 seems more reliable 20:31:41 I would not feel comfortable doing that without the author's permission 20:32:15 do you have contact with shen noether? 20:32:30 I do not 20:35:22 the MRL repo is itself a copy of shen's original work.. 20:36:19 You're free to make a merge request with the writeup to monero-site (as is anyone); I just don't like the idea of doing so without author permission 20:36:44 However, it's not my decision 20:37:09 well if anyone knows how to contact shen Ill see what he says 20:37:45 or if this shen.noether⊙gc still works Ill try that 20:40:20 Maybe the library section of monero-site could be used? Then it's not like it's being republished or anything, but simply hosted? 20:40:43 Is that the location you had in mind koe? 20:43:53 I was going to use MRL page since Shen was an MRL guy, I can do Library instead if it makes more sense 20:44:06 I dunno, just spitballing here 20:44:29 Again, not up to me 20:46:29 might be nice to have an 'extra papers' section in the Library; not sure how hairy copyright could get, but from my point of view everything is free game 20:46:54 What do you mean? 20:47:18 like 'here's a list of helpful papers' 20:47:34 By whom? You can't just take random preprints and distribute 20:47:49 lol that's what Im saying :p 20:47:55 ok 20:48:12 anyway, what about putting an UNPUBLISHED: tag? 20:48:29 instead of MRL-0001 or whatever 20:48:57 Those preprint designations are pretty arbitrary 20:49:15 Not sure what would cause a change from "unpublished" to something else 20:49:29 Preprint archives aren't really publication in the traditional sense either 20:49:35 I mean for the hash to point writeup 21:06:50 here is a sample using imgbb to share image https://ibb.co/2qxhsqh 21:09:38 btw email sent to shen noether was returned, looks like dead address 21:22:40 I like that presentation 21:22:51 Doesn't imply a new publication 21:23:39 ok! thanks :) Ill make the PR 21:40:21 koe: starting the abstract with "I discuss..." is not optimal. Who is "I" to the visitor? I suggest to use more impersonal wording like "discussion about..." and maybe add "by -author-" at the end 21:43:34 it's directly out of the document; am I allowed to edit it? 21:45:33 The author uses "I" frequently in the paper 21:45:39 It's fairly nonstandard 21:57:07 i'm afraid that would create some confusion. It also gives the feeling the author themselves published the paper 21:58:55 I can change abstract -> summary, and write something decent 22:07:06 Ah, so you mean write a new summary that includes the author name 22:14:37 hows this https://ibb.co/8mkLncQ 22:16:21 Good summary 22:28:49 That's better IMO 22:33:09 updated pr