-
humandoinghumantHi guys, I think there was an MRL paper which discussed the possibility of matching mixin sampling with the actual spend time distribution. I couldn't figure out which one it was though, does any here know off hand?
-
humandoinghumantDamn, just found it. Sorry to bother you guys.
-
moneromoooCurrently, coinbase outputs are deemed rct, and a well known mask used, despite them being technically in the clear.
-
moneromoooI'm wondering whether to consider them triptych as well. I'm thinking no, which would make them spent using a CLSAG signature - smaller.
-
moneromoooThis is because of the previous discussions about coinbase outputs being not really private given pool practices. However, maybe a substantial ring size increase might change that view.
-
moneromoooAny opinion about this ?
-
sech1How are they rct if they don't have any ring? They are rct::RCTTypeNull in the code IIRC
-
moneromoooThey are considered rct outputs when selecting fake outs or spending them.
-
sech1ah, in this case why not consider them triptych?
-
moneromoooYes.
-
sech1How do you spend them if they're not triptych?
-
moneromoooI do not understand this question.
-
UkoeHBthere has been some interest in segregating coinbase outputs in their own rings
-
UkoeHBwell from sgp_ and I anyway
-
sgp_I still support that but it's low priority
-
sgp_Coinbase outputs are now uncommon
-
sech1moneromooo as I understand, if you don't consider them triptych, they can't be fake outputs in triptych transactions which means spending coinbase outputs can only ring with other coinbase outputs?
-
moneromoooYes to the first part, no to the second, they would be spent with pre-triptyct rct outs.
-
moneromoooBut you make a good point that this would mean a completely bullshit time based selection, so they'll have to be considered triptych.