hi, previously the max transaction weight was

300kB - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE

and now it's

300kB /2 - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE

wouldn't it make more sense to be (300kB - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE)/2? Am I missing the reasoning behind this?

Sarang have you seen any of those traceable range proofs papers for "private auditability?"

How do you mean?

If you mean do these proposals remove the PPT adversary restriction, no

whats PPT?

probabilitistic polynomial time

You can't be computationally unbounded

my mum said i can be whatever i want to be sarang

ah meetings on wednesdays from now :)

few time's that I'd catch it and now.. :D

*times

Yeah, no meeting today

how's everyone hope the holidays went well

I'll get trough the paper you sent me this week sarang

it's a hard read :D

Remind me which one I sent... I'm working on a few

triptych

Multi-input?

or single-input

it has both because you said the multi-input has a not-so-sound security reduction

Did I just link you to the Overleaf documents?

yea

Ah ok

They've both been updated recently

I recommend recompiling and downloading before reading

so you managed the security reduction?

for the second variant?

No, but it's been simplified a bit by adjusting the proof relation

Thought we had it nailed down to a particular DL variant, but not so

okay then will ping back somewhere this week :)

see ya

suraeNoether: you on?

I'm present but focused on Python right now

What's up?

heyo

Wondering if you have any last comments on single-input Triptych preprint before I toss it onto the IACR archive

or if you wish to be added as an author

I would be honored to be added as an author

I have no further comments on the single version yet but I will probably have more comments in the coming weeks as I continue to go deep dive on the multi version

Have you a recommendation for submitting now (and revising as needed), or waiting?

IACR makes it easy to revise, but they don't but revisions to the top of the current list

*don't move revisions

Well let me pull a fast one and change the question slightly: what do you think of the idea of writing out the multi input version of triptych as a second paper and leaving single as a standalone work?

I'm not advocating for it necessarily but it's an alternative

If we're going to keep it as a single paper I think we should get multi laid down

So that revisions have to do with correctness of proofs and stuff and not including new content

Then again it is supposed to be a preprint so who cares?

Okay I've talked myself into not having any opinion at all

Sry

I think there's value in the single version as a basic LRS and d-LRS

The multi version has some significant changes that enhance functionality beyond a simple d-LRS

Then I propose we shoot for single on iacr as a standalone and then come out with either an appendix or a second paper with multi once we are more comfortable with the proofs and assumptions.

cool

You comfortable with posting immediately?

Hmm suraeNoether must be away

Yeah I'm comfy

Triptych has been submitted to the IACR preprint archive

Should appear within a couple of days

Any preference on whether it should simply be linked from the MRL page?

I don't really like the idea of hosting specially-formatted versions of papers that also appear on IACR (even though there are no license issues with this)

Ditto with CLSAG