05:49:19 <koe> hi, previously the max transaction weight was
05:49:23 <koe> 300kB - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE
05:49:26 <koe> and now it's
05:49:33 <koe> 300kB /2  - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE
05:49:59 <koe> wouldn't it make more sense to be (300kB - CRYPTONOTE_COINBASE_BLOB_RESERVED_SIZE)/2? Am I missing the reasoning behind this?
15:17:18 <suraeNoether> Sarang have you seen any of those traceable range proofs papers for "private auditability?"
15:19:52 <sarang> How do you mean?
15:39:04 <sarang> If you mean do these proposals remove the PPT adversary restriction, no
15:55:23 <midipoet> whats PPT?
15:59:45 <sarang> probabilitistic polynomial time
15:59:58 <sarang> You can't be computationally unbounded
16:12:54 <midipoet> my mum said i can be whatever i want to be sarang
16:57:08 <silur> ah meetings on wednesdays from now :)
16:57:27 <silur> few time's that I'd catch it and now.. :D
16:57:38 <silur> *times
16:57:46 <sarang> Yeah, no meeting today
16:58:09 <silur> how's everyone hope the holidays went well
16:58:19 <silur> I'll get trough the paper you sent me this week sarang
16:58:31 <silur> it's a hard read :D
16:58:42 <sarang> Remind me which one I sent... I'm working on a few
16:59:31 <silur> triptych
16:59:40 <sarang> Multi-input?
16:59:45 <sarang> or single-input
17:00:16 <silur> it has both because you said the multi-input has a not-so-sound security reduction
17:00:34 <sarang> Did I just link you to the Overleaf documents?
17:00:38 <silur> yea
17:00:40 <sarang> Ah ok
17:00:48 <sarang> They've both been updated recently
17:01:01 <sarang> I recommend recompiling and downloading before reading
17:01:06 <silur> so you managed the security reduction?
17:01:14 <silur> for the second variant?
17:01:34 <sarang> No, but it's been simplified a bit by adjusting the proof relation
17:01:59 <sarang> Thought we had it nailed down to a particular DL variant, but not so
17:08:47 <silur> okay then will ping back somewhere this week :)
17:09:45 <sarang> see ya
17:10:45 <sarang> suraeNoether: you on?
17:13:15 <suraeNoether> I'm present but focused on Python right now
17:13:36 <suraeNoether> What's up?
17:13:38 <sarang> heyo
17:13:55 <sarang> Wondering if you have any last comments on single-input Triptych preprint before I toss it onto the IACR archive
17:14:06 <sarang> or if you wish to be added as an author
17:15:51 <suraeNoether> I would be honored to be added as an author
17:16:06 <suraeNoether> I have no further comments on the single version yet but I will probably have more comments in the coming weeks as I continue to go deep dive on the multi version
17:16:37 <sarang> Have you a recommendation for submitting now (and revising as needed), or waiting?
17:16:55 <sarang> IACR makes it easy to revise, but they don't but revisions to the top of the current list
17:17:05 <sarang> *don't move revisions
17:17:57 <suraeNoether> Well let me pull a fast one and change the question slightly: what do you think of the idea of writing out the multi input version of triptych as a second paper and leaving single as a standalone work?
17:18:25 <suraeNoether> I'm not advocating for it necessarily but it's an alternative
17:18:48 <suraeNoether> If we're going to keep it as a single paper I think we should get multi laid down
17:18:59 <suraeNoether> So that revisions have to do with correctness of proofs and stuff and not including new content
17:19:15 <suraeNoether> Then again it is supposed to be a preprint so who cares?
17:19:33 <suraeNoether> Okay I've talked myself into not having any opinion at all
17:19:37 <suraeNoether> Sry
17:21:39 <sarang> I think there's value in the single version as a basic LRS and d-LRS
17:22:19 <sarang> The multi version has some significant changes that enhance functionality beyond a simple d-LRS
17:33:11 <suraeNoether> Then I propose we shoot for single on iacr as a standalone and then come out with either an appendix or a second paper with multi once we are more comfortable with the proofs and assumptions.
17:34:22 <sarang> cool
17:34:33 <sarang> You comfortable with posting immediately?
18:22:25 <sarang> Hmm suraeNoether must be away
22:03:31 <suraeNoether> Yeah I'm comfy
23:07:46 <sarang> Triptych has been submitted to the IACR preprint archive
23:08:07 <sarang> Should appear within a couple of days
23:08:23 <sarang> Any preference on whether it should simply be linked from the MRL page?
23:08:54 <sarang> I don't really like the idea of hosting specially-formatted versions of papers that also appear on IACR (even though there are no license issues with this)
23:09:04 <sarang> Ditto with CLSAG