ping /names

<rbrunner7> Mmmmmmmmmm: I already got a headache from that animated GIF on your github :) Seriously, maybe just a single GIF, or play it with 10 times less speed? I will review.

<rbrunner7> Oh, I forgot, -dev does not relay ...

it does

but he does not have speech permissions

<rbrunner7> Yeah, just saw it. What do you mean, "no speech permissions"?

channel requires being voiced

<rbrunner7> Sure. Right now I could not write directly on IRC, understood. But if I write here in Mattermost, all is well, no?

we see it on irc, rbrunner7, if that is what you mean.

<rbrunner7> Yes. Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks xmrmatterbridge

The almost-seizure-inducing GIF is made to encourage people to scroll to the donation section :)

Lol

fluffypony: you have time today / tomorrow for dns hashes?

would be good to get many people on v0.17.1.3

moneromooo so I've been looking at monero-project/monero #6963 in the light of recent events and I have a question. Why is /16 filtering only applied to IPv4 addresses? IPv4 mapped in IPv6 addresses are not filtered by /16

nvm, the latest code fixed it

that makes it rather efficient. Asshole peers use only a few /16 ranges

I know close to nothing about IPv6. Feel free to improve anything you see I missed.

I'm checking the latest code now and it looks reasonable

In particular, my knowledge about IPv6-in-IPv4 comes from wikipedia after I noticed the curious IPv6 addresses in peer lists.

And it looks like there's a fair number of "interesting" schemes in IPv6, so there might be other ways to embed those in.

m2049r wants to be able to talk here from Matrix. Is this possible?

yes

I never used matrix but people write here from matrix so should be possible

Nick ? Matrix usually adds [m] suffix, I see only m2049r here.

this message seems to be inaccurate

2020-11-10 19:58:49.270 W Lost all outbound connections to anonymity network - currently unable to send transaction(s)

I had long-standing i2p outbound connections at that moment

tho possibly no outbound tor connections

yes, if you enable both tor and i2p

is uses both, so if one is missing it will print that message

seems like we could stand to be more specific

but also if you send a tx

it will not send it until both are connected

afaik

not sure if that is intended behaviour

that definitely sounds like a bug

it means nodes that are on both networks, presumably for better connectivity, will actually have worse than nodes on only one or the other

yep

would prefer that changed too

yeah, lemme take a peek

seems like that message is per-zone

so loss in one shouldn't affect the other

I did see that behaviour, tx not sending until I removed i2p tx-proxy even though I had many out connections for Tor

that was while I didn’t have i2p out connections

hmm

messaging being per zone does seem like what we are experiencing? right?

yeah

%

nothing obvious to me, someone else will have to look at it

also, the list of connections is filtered by blockchain height

so a connection may exist, but be ignored if the remote node is behind the expected height

so this message is definitely misleading

but if a node is behind we don’t want to send them tx anyway, right?

afaik they drop it

sure. but the messae is "lost all connections" which is false

yep

Lost all outbound connections to [this] anonymity network

The second part is misleading though.

can we please have it log the name of [this] network ...

or change the message to something like "no suitable outbound [xxx] connections"

"... for height hhh"

hm, I don't see how to get the zone ID out of detail::zone in cryptonote_protocol/levin_notify.cpp

Can someone explain what grace_blocks is in get_fee_estimate? Is this the amount of blocks in which you want your transaction to be included in? i.e. lower grace_blocks, higher fee?

Please*

<m2049r> gingeropolous: yes. before i'm done with it the workaround would be to use orbot which works perfectly with monerujo.

luigi1111: ^ can you block from org?

looks like a troll opening empty issues

done

Why do people do that?

some people misclick, but if it is done multiple times most likely trolling

moneromooo: I think it's m2049r[m]

it'd have to be

Well, noone by that nick here.

<rehrar "moneromooo: I think it's m2049r["> It doesnt have to be, like my nick is not [m]