06:11:25 <jtgrassie> ping /names
07:42:49 <xmrmatterbridge> <rbrunner7> Mmmmmmmmmm: I already got a headache from that animated GIF on your github :) Seriously, maybe just a single GIF, or play it with 10 times less speed? I will review.
07:44:50 <xmrmatterbridge> <rbrunner7> Oh, I forgot, -dev does not relay ...
07:45:03 <selsta> it does
07:45:12 <selsta> but he does not have speech permissions
07:45:45 <xmrmatterbridge> <rbrunner7> Yeah, just saw it. What do you mean, "no speech permissions"?
07:45:55 <selsta> channel requires being voiced
07:46:32 <xmrmatterbridge> <rbrunner7> Sure. Right now I could not write directly on IRC, understood. But if I write here in Mattermost, all is well, no?
07:46:59 <Inge-> we see it on irc, rbrunner7, if that is what you mean.
07:47:38 <xmrmatterbridge> <rbrunner7> Yes. Sorry for the confusion.
07:57:30 <Mmmmmmmmmm> Thanks xmrmatterbridge
07:57:58 <Mmmmmmmmmm> The almost-seizure-inducing GIF is made to encourage people to scroll to the donation section :)
07:59:47 <rbrunner> Lol
12:36:45 <selsta> fluffypony: you have time today / tomorrow for dns hashes?
12:36:57 <selsta> would be good to get many people on v0.17.1.3
13:16:08 -xmr-pr- tobtoht opened pull request #7001: Fix inconsistent indentation
13:16:09 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7001
18:01:08 -xmr-pr- mj-xmr opened pull request #7002: Reduce compilation time of epee/portable_storage_template_helper.h
18:01:08 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7002
18:44:31 <sech1> moneromooo so I've been looking at https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/6963 in the light of recent events and I have a question. Why is /16 filtering only applied to IPv4 addresses? IPv4 mapped in IPv6 addresses are not filtered by /16
18:47:08 <sech1> nvm, the latest code fixed it
18:49:16 <sech1> that makes it rather efficient. Asshole peers use only a few /16 ranges
18:49:21 <moneromooo> I know close to nothing about IPv6. Feel free to improve anything you see I missed.
18:49:56 <sech1> I'm checking the latest code now and it looks reasonable
18:50:01 <moneromooo> In particular, my knowledge about IPv6-in-IPv4 comes from wikipedia after I noticed the curious IPv6 addresses in peer lists.
18:50:28 <moneromooo> And it looks like there's a fair number of "interesting" schemes in IPv6, so there might be other ways to embed those in.
19:18:12 <rehrar> m2049r wants to be able to talk here from Matrix. Is this possible?
19:19:26 <selsta> yes
19:19:42 <selsta> I never used matrix but people write here from matrix so should be possible
19:20:55 <moneromooo> Nick ? Matrix usually adds [m] suffix, I see only m2049r here.
19:59:48 <hyc> this message seems to be inaccurate
19:59:49 <hyc> 2020-11-10 19:58:49.270 W Lost all outbound connections to anonymity network - currently unable to send transaction(s)
20:00:02 <hyc> I had long-standing i2p outbound connections at that moment
20:00:12 <hyc> tho possibly no outbound tor connections
20:00:21 <selsta> yes, if you enable both tor and i2p
20:00:28 <selsta> is uses both, so if one is missing it will print that message
20:00:52 <hyc> seems like we could stand to be more specific
20:01:04 <selsta> but also if you send a tx
20:01:11 <selsta> it will not send it until both are connected
20:01:12 <selsta> afaik
20:01:26 <selsta> not sure if that is intended behaviour
20:01:46 <hyc> that definitely sounds like a bug
20:02:11 <hyc> it means nodes that are on both networks, presumably for better connectivity, will actually have worse than nodes on only one or the other
20:02:16 <selsta> yep
20:02:25 <selsta> would prefer that changed too
20:02:35 <hyc> yeah, lemme take a peek
20:04:47 <hyc> seems like that message is per-zone
20:04:54 <hyc> so loss in one shouldn't affect the other
20:05:57 <selsta> I did see that behaviour, tx not sending until I removed i2p tx-proxy even though I had many out connections for Tor
20:06:08 <selsta> that was while I didn’t have i2p out connections
20:06:14 <hyc> hmm
20:07:17 <selsta> messaging being per zone does seem like what we are experiencing? right?
20:07:30 <hyc> yeah
20:07:40 <hyc> %
20:08:52 <hyc> nothing obvious to me, someone else will have to look at it
20:11:49 <hyc> also, the list of connections is filtered by blockchain height
20:12:13 <hyc> so a connection may exist, but be ignored if the remote node is behind the expected height
20:12:19 <hyc> so this message is definitely misleading
20:14:11 <selsta> but if a node is behind we don’t want to send them tx anyway, right?
20:14:14 <selsta> afaik they drop it
20:14:51 <hyc> sure. but the messae is "lost all connections" which is false
20:15:18 <selsta> yep
20:15:22 <moneromooo> Lost all outbound connections to [this] anonymity network
20:15:36 <moneromooo> The second part is misleading though.
20:15:59 <hyc> can we please have it log the name of [this] network ...
20:16:41 <hyc> or change the message to something like "no suitable outbound [xxx] connections"
20:17:04 * moneromooo votes yes
20:20:30 <hyc> "... for height hhh"
20:25:27 <hyc> hm, I don't see how to get the zone ID out of detail::zone in cryptonote_protocol/levin_notify.cpp
20:31:08 -xmr-pr- vtnerd opened pull request #7003: Change to more efficient allocation strategy in byte_stream
20:31:08 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7003
20:46:08 -xmr-pr- vtnerd opened pull request #7005: Allow byte_stream->byte_slice conversion to shrink unused buffer space
20:46:08 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7005
20:46:09 -xmr-pr- MoneroArbo opened issue #7004: Inbound and outbound i2p connections have the same peer ID
20:46:09 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/7004
21:17:07 <Mmmmmmmmmm> Can someone explain what grace_blocks is in get_fee_estimate? Is this the amount of blocks in which you want your transaction to be included in? i.e. lower grace_blocks, higher fee?
21:17:12 <Mmmmmmmmmm> Please*
21:19:46 <xmrmatterbridge> <m2049r> gingeropolous: yes. before i'm done with it the workaround would be to use orbot which works perfectly with monerujo.
22:31:08 -xmr-pr- RomanDahKing opened issue #7006: Monero
22:31:09 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/7006
22:31:57 <selsta> luigi1111: ^ can you block from org?
22:32:06 <selsta> looks like a troll opening empty issues
22:33:01 <luigi1111w> done
22:33:09 <Mmmmmmmmmm> Why do people do that?
22:39:46 <selsta> some people misclick, but if it is done multiple times most likely trolling
23:10:46 <rehrar> moneromooo: I think it's m2049r[m]
23:10:48 <rehrar> it'd have to be
23:11:12 <moneromooo> Well, noone by that nick here.
23:14:58 <sethsimmons> <rehrar "moneromooo: I think it's m2049r["> It doesnt have to be, like my nick is not [m]