-
fluffypony
-
fluffypony
Rotki is a portfolio tracking tool
-
fluffypony
I'm wondering what native Monero integration would look like
-
fluffypony
I don't think it's feasible for people to keep RPC wallets open for every Monero wallet they have
-
fluffypony
but maybe using something like the light wallet scanner
-
fluffypony
might end up being quite a bit more complex in the long run, but RPC wallet integration is easy out the gate
-
Osiris1
someone here?
-
rbrunner
Depends. Who wants to know?
-
Osiris1
anyway isn't about monero is about aeon
-
Osiris1
i want to send from cli wallet and get this ? Error: internal error:bad nonrct distribution size: 0
-
rbrunner
Wow. But quite similar, no?
-
Osiris1
yep
-
Osiris1
and after this
-
Osiris1
Error: There was an error,wich could mean the node may be trying to get you to retry creating a transaction ,and zero in wich outputs you own. Or it could be a bona fide error.It may be prudent to disconnect from this node,and not try to send a transaction immediately.Alternatively,connect to another node so the original node cannot corelate information.
-
Osiris1
i didn't opened the wallet in years...
-
Osiris1
balance is there but cant sent
-
rbrunner
Not sure, but indeed sounds somehow like a but (or at least a problem) with very old outputs
-
rbrunner
*bug
-
Osiris1
and what i can do ?:)
-
rbrunner
Might be that only a Aeon dev can answer this, stoffu if you can catch them. The coin might have a difference in this regard from Monero.
-
Osiris1
thank you
-
jwinterm
Osiris1: I think you need to delete your wallet binary file
-
jwinterm
and maybe also nuke chain data
-
jwinterm
or maybe see the last few comments in this thread
monero-project/monero #4718
-
Osiris1
jwinterm fixed remote node not have updates in year just synced to my own chain and all work like charm
-
Osiris1
thank you anyway!
-
dEBRUYNE
I wrote a message for the mailing list, please review:
-
dEBRUYNE
-
moneromooo
> regarding the scheduled network upgraded
-
moneromooo
The last d seems wrong
-
dEBRUYNE
ty
-
moneromooo
Same sentence: posted on our blog that contains
-
moneromooo
I'd say "on our blog containing"
-
moneromooo
The current phrasing is correct, but it makes it sound like the blog, rather than the particular article, contains the thing.
-
moneromooo
Which might be the case, but I suspect the opposite is meant.
-
moneromooo
"more elaborate information" sounds weird, but I get what it means. Maybe more in-depth. More elaborate sounds... I dunno, more baroque. Maybe it's just me though :)
-
dEBRUYNE
moneromooo: I've changed the sentence to:
-
dEBRUYNE
'Note that an informational post regarding the scheduled network upgrade has been posted on our blog containing more in-depth information for users and miners.'
-
moneromooo
It does seem less artificial to me, yes.
-
dEBRUYNE
Updated with mooo's comments ->
pastebin.com/G5FaU2QB
-
gingeropolous
i ponder if this would suffice: "To be sufficiently prepared, all participants in the Monero ecosystem should run CLI 0.17 ..."
-
gingeropolous
this might be style, " a new ring signature construction, namely CLSAG, " ... i interpret the "namely" as meaning one in particular.
-
gingeropolous
here, i think it should read " a new ring signature construction, called CLSAG, "
-
gingeropolous
but their might be specifics under the hood where CLSAG is one of many new ring sig constructions? I mean, there are many new ones, but ther'es only one in the code.
-
gingeropolous
who wants a semantic sandwhich
-
gingeropolous
"with rigorous security" seems superfluous.
-
sarang
FWIW it's almost certain that MLSAG inherits the security guarantees of CLSAG, but the proofs weren't done for it
-
sarang
And yes, CLSAG will be the only ring signature construction permitted for new transactions after the upgrade height
-
moneromooo
(except ring signatures for pre-rct outputs)
-
sarang
True :)
-
sarang
"MLSAG signatures shan't be allowed" then