Monero forum seems down :/

should be back up soon

Are you working on v0.17.1.8 yet?

rehrar luigi1111: If the rules of the CCS changed, that should be stated somewhere, and possibly an announcement should be made.

Also, would be probably a good idea to post something under the CCS that got rejected, to let people known. After the meeting i haven't seen any change, but people need to know and there should be transparency about what lead to the decision

what was rejected ErCiccione[m]?

Some work made by CCS-funded translators was of poor quality, and now will have to be reverted (working on it as we speak)

Rolling back committed work is always terribly draining. Just made a small donation to the CCS general fund purely in honor of Yeoman's Work on ErCiccione's part

dgoddard__: Thanks for your donation, but i'm not sure where it went 🙂 there isn't a "CCS general fund", only a general fund or single CCS proposals. My new proposal will be out in a couple of weeks. Nice of you regardless!

Subadderss listed for "General Fund" at the bottom of the CCS page 888tNkZrPN6JsEgekjMnABU4TBzc2Dt29EPAvkRxbANsAnjyPbb3iQ1YBRk1UXcdRsiKc9dhwMVgN5S9cQUiyoogDavup3H

CCS Specific General Fund is a nice idea

yeah that's core's general fund.

yes but announced where

I guess we could have a blog post with a short post mortem along with the rule change and also probably the language review fund

<midipoet "CCS Specific General Fund is a n"> Agreed

luigi1111w: The blog post would be a good idea IMO