00:04:43 <Franck[m]> Monero forum seems down :/
00:05:43 <sgp_> should be back up soon
00:06:12 <sgp_> https://twitter.com/MoneroSpace/status/1338607075157479425
11:13:14 <Toophoned> Are you working on v0.17.1.8 yet?
12:17:23 <ErCiccione[m]> rehrar luigi1111: If the rules of the CCS changed, that should be stated somewhere, and possibly an announcement should be made.
12:18:40 <ErCiccione[m]> Also, would be probably a good idea to post something under the CCS that got rejected, to let people known. After the meeting i haven't seen any change, but people need to know and there should be transparency about what lead to the decision
13:17:52 <ComplyLast> what was rejected ErCiccione[m]?
13:23:02 <ErCiccione[m]> Some work made by CCS-funded translators was of poor quality, and now will have to be reverted (working on it as we speak)
15:59:43 <dgoddard__> Rolling back committed work is always terribly draining. Just made a small donation to the CCS general fund purely in honor of Yeoman's Work on ErCiccione's part
16:03:27 <ErCiccione[m]> dgoddard__: Thanks for your donation, but i'm not sure where it went 🙂 there isn't a "CCS general fund", only a general fund or single CCS proposals. My new proposal will be out in a couple of weeks. Nice of you regardless!
16:04:18 <dgoddard__> Subadderss listed for "General Fund" at the bottom of the CCS page 888tNkZrPN6JsEgekjMnABU4TBzc2Dt29EPAvkRxbANsAnjyPbb3iQ1YBRk1UXcdRsiKc9dhwMVgN5S9cQUiyoogDavup3H
16:06:11 <midipoet> CCS Specific General Fund is a nice idea
16:06:17 <ErCiccione[m]> yeah that's core's general fund.
17:02:47 <luigi1111w> yes but announced where
17:04:26 <luigi1111w> I guess we could have a blog post with a short post mortem along with the rule change and also probably the language review fund
17:08:59 <Lovera[m]1> <midipoet "CCS Specific General Fund is a n"> Agreed
18:52:08 <ErCiccione[m]> luigi1111w: The blog post would be a good idea IMO