00:37:20 Ok I confirmed using monero-gui that the subaddress used by changenow is correct. Waiting for more scan :] 00:37:57 Franck[m]: afaik monerod node runs on a raspberry 00:38:09 not sure if it has enough resources for both bitcoin and monero 00:38:49 It seems that monerod is the one consuming most resources so if it runs, it should be fine. 01:06:12 Franck[m], once initial sync is done it should be less resource intensive 01:06:29 it would actually be cool if you could post some kind of pic showing it running both 01:07:08 I am at `2020-11-13 01:06:10.967 [P2P1] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1599 Synced 1446532/2229370 (64%, 782838 left, 3% of total synced, estimated 2.0 days left)` 01:08:33 thats around where it gets slow 01:09:54 https://imgur.com/a/9MvqpJ8 01:11:04 The CPU is not even 100% 01:11:07 I guess it's the ram and disk 01:15:46 fluffypony, ^ 01:27:18 thanks jtgrassie 01:32:26 most welcome 08:59:43 anybody have experience using bisq? 09:05:27 If you are interested in providing liquidity please keep a close look to the atomic swap project 09:10:27 which project is this? i am unfamiliar 09:16:48 https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/h4sh3d-atomic-swap-implementation.html 09:24:31 IRC channel is #monero-swap. We (COMIT) are also working on this, matrix channel is #comit-monero:matrix.org . 09:29:08 that's really neat 09:43:21 I get that people are excited about atomic swaps, but it's still gonna be a (long) while before atomic swaps go live 09:52:08 How long do you reckon? 09:55:42 I don't know for sure, but the project started last month and the proposed timeline is 7 months. Hyping people up so much now that we are in the wait-and-see phase might be counterproductive imo 09:57:00 7 months is an eternity in crypto world - and that's assuming there are no delays nor problems of any kind 10:17:15 endor00[m]: I mean, there's already 2 PoCs. They're just PoCs. 10:17:47 They COULD be hacked into a GUI/reviewed by a couple other devs in a week or two. They just wouldn't benefit the space. From UX/insecurities... 10:18:20 The time is do it properly, and create the relevant infra. That said, COMIT will have a different approach than the team funded by the CCS, so it'll be interesting to see how it works out :) 10:18:51 That would be a terrible idea - especially putting them in the official wallet, which is supposed to be a stable reference design 10:18:58 Wait, there's two teams working on atomic swaps now? 10:19:18 Exactly 10:19:27 sech1: Depends on how you count 10:19:27 There is such a thing as 'releasing too early' 10:19:30 Are they related in any way or completely independent? 10:19:49 Three PoCs exist 10:20:15 I did one of them with PlasmaPower, and I joined h4sh3d for the CCS proposal for a full fledged framework, ready for usage. 10:20:31 So h4shed and co will be developing the design from the CCS proposal. 10:21:02 What, a new PoC got released in the last 60 seconds? xD 10:21:07 COMIT also did a PoC, and they're working on turning it into a DEX. As in, making it app with a lot more functionality that also has order discovery. 10:21:25 I forgot one:P It's some Python project for some random BTC fork. I wasn't a fan 10:21:36 I mean, it looked accurate? Great to see yet another impl? 10:22:06 So it's not a DEX like Bisq, yet rather a BTC-XMR swap app, yet it would have an order book... 10:22:34 So that leaves 3 PoCs, 2 projects each with their own developers, 1 framework, and 1 single-market DEX 10:22:57 The framework is planned to have example apps, which would be usable, but no order book functionality. 10:23:11 Just to provide context on scope and differences. 10:23:56 I've been bringing up the potential to collab with Franck[m], yet I think our timelines will be too different. They seem to want something focused for now, while we're working on a larger framework for any app/service. 10:24:19 Both are respectable, and both can benefit from each other. I don't believe it'll become 1 team though/2 teams working on 1 project. 10:26:12 **I brought it up with the Farcaster group as a whole. Franck[m] was the one who responded, as he's keeping an eye on our discussions. 15:43:39 hi 15:44:09 my blockchain is corrupted, does db-salvage actually fix it or just redownload it? 15:44:18 i do not want to redownload 15:47:49 Worth a try, but it is kind of 50/50 15:47:55 In case it doesn't work, you will have to redownload 15:47:55 I would say try to salvage it. I don't think you have something to loose, don't know any better tool 15:50:07 for fucks sake 15:50:30 salvage didnt work 15:50:53 i dont understand why it cant just resume from the last non-corrupted block 15:51:18 Probably because the blockchain is a single file? 15:51:34 what difference does that make? 15:51:35 naw thats not it D: 15:54:28 this is very unreliable, just one tiny bit of corruption shouldnt fuck up the entire blockchain that you need to redownload 100GB from scratch :/ 15:56:17 how do you know it's just one tiny bit of corruption though 16:15:39 lmdb claims to be crash-proof. do you 100% trust your hardware and filesystem? 16:15:56 The blockchain file is not simply one block after the other; that database file has a quite complicated internal structure, for fast data access 16:16:37 And I don't think it's "very unreliable", we would have many more people here with pitchforks if that was the case. Guess you were unlucky. 16:16:49 dEBRUYNE et all, I've still got no auto updater pop up. is it confirmed working for others? 16:17:05 Matlin already bailed out 16:17:45 Maybe going back to trusty old Bitcoin then :) 16:17:50 damn smart filter 16:18:09 extremely trusty indeed. never mind the 60,000 something xbt seized a couple of days ago by the DoJ ;-) 16:32:14 Lyza: Haven't seen reports of it not working :/ 16:33:37 probably a lot of people updated manually since this was a big / important series of updates 16:34:00 I also can update manually, not worried about that, just want to help make sure the auto-update is actually working 17:36:35 Lyza, updater popup? You mean a message in the daemon about needing an update? 17:37:04 (I've seen this message in the daemon, so I can confirm that works) 18:41:39 anyone know the reason why the devs put the tx public key in the extras field and not simply included it as a mandatory field in the tx structure? 18:47:15 No, but I'll hypthesize that it's possibly because it's not a consensus item. 18:50:12 afaik it's inherited from the earliest cryptonote code, so who knows for sure the intial rational. 19:34:09 rotten: hello :) 22:21:37 * algo_max[m] sent a long message: < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/YqorJnxLkQbmZupdNcDuyPck/message.txt > 22:22:30 (yes I'm running it under root... in docker) 22:28:25 algo_max[m]: i don't have anything to say about the memory usage, but don't assume that containers/namespaces are perfect. you should still try to run applications as normal users inside a container 22:30:51 yes it's on my todo list actually, just didn't get the time to fix it yet 22:33:06 I'll keep the process running as long as my system's memory permits. Maybe someone could help me diagnose where the memory went.