02:36:54 <matrix9950[m]> Hi guys
02:55:41 <sethsimmons> matrix9950: hi 👋
03:06:40 <matrix9950[m]> Thank you
07:02:46 <drjingle[m]> Does this thing work?
07:03:04 <monerod[m]> what thing?
07:04:16 <drjingle[m]> The chat, it's very empty, despite the other bridges having thorough history. Are you on IRC  or matrix?
07:05:03 <monerod[m]> it works and is active. Im on matrix
07:16:37 <fluffypony> drjingle[m]: there's no bridge to Telegram, so if it's too quiet for you here then you should try either of the Monero Telegram groups
11:09:36 <endor00[m]> <fluffypony "drjingle: there's no bridge to T"> Speaking of which, why not add it? There is a Telegram-Matrix bridges already, it just requires setup
11:09:48 <fluffypony> endor00[m]: we had one for ages
11:09:50 <fluffypony> it was terrible
11:09:51 <fluffypony> so much spam
11:09:56 <endor00[m]> Running our own instead of using t2bot.io would be preferable though
11:10:05 <fluffypony> I think the current SNR here is pretty high
11:10:10 <fluffypony> low I mean
11:10:21 <fluffypony> so it's useful for people that want casual chat, but with a lower SNR than Telegram
11:10:22 <endor00[m]> Ah, yes, spam
11:11:09 <asymptotically> telescam
11:11:25 <endor00[m]> The spam in the Monero Mining group is not too bad, but I'm guessing it's also because it's a less popular/important group
11:11:49 <dsc_> Suppose it's not only the spam, also the quality of chats
11:11:55 <ErCiccione[m]> ^
11:12:01 <dsc_> I like IRC because it has a higher barrier of entry
11:12:38 <ErCiccione[m]> The quality of the conversations on telegram is always very low in my experience
11:13:17 <endor00[m]> Nobody likes an eternal september
11:13:33 <endor00[m]> But I guess it's a price to pay for broad community outreach
11:16:01 <dsc_> endor00[m]: There are many popular open-source projects on freenode that don't integrate telegram directly into their chatroom
11:16:40 <dsc_> and they do fine in terms of outreach :P
11:18:44 <ErCiccione[m]> Ywah, we don't need to have all monero chats in existence relayed on one IRC channel
11:19:38 <ErCiccione[m]> ywah?
11:46:28 <Mochi103> Barrier to entry isn't too high though dsc_, somehow I was able to get in here.
11:49:10 <moneromooo> That's because if it's too high, you can just duck to go below it.
11:55:36 <Mochi103> oooooh! That must've been what happened moneromooo.
11:56:42 <asymptotically> going under the bar must be using a telescam/discourse bridge
13:10:27 <Nizumzen> is there a list of public monero nodes that I can use with the monero-wallet-cli program? I'd rather not sync the whole block chain to my computer at the moment
13:10:47 <Nizumzen> but I can if it is required
13:14:46 <kayront> Nizumzen: https://www.moneroworld.com
13:15:42 <ErCiccione[m]> Nizumzen: There is an autodiscovery option in the wallet which will automatically look for a remote node for you. I don't recall the commnad now
13:23:19 <Nizumzen> ah thank you both - I'll read the help section and see if I can find the command otherwise I'll use that website
13:29:14 <moneromooo> print_pl publicrpc
13:29:22 <moneromooo> (in monerod)
15:37:05 <sunwind> best place to convert my XMR to BTC?
15:40:02 <Mochi103> sunwind, depends
15:40:15 <sunwind> is xmr.to good?
15:40:20 <Mochi103> yeah
15:40:24 <Mochi103> very good
15:40:36 <Mochi103> I'm not even being paid to say that.
15:41:20 <ndorf> xmr.to is awesome, not just good
15:41:37 <sunwind> on create order, I put the address I want my BTC to go to, and then the lower field has an amount to put in - do I change that to XMR and put how much XMR I want converted to BTC?
15:41:43 <moneromooo> xmr.to is the best thing since sliced awe.
15:43:23 <sunwind> just wanna get it right, I think that's right but wanna be sure
15:44:07 <Mochi103> sunwind, yes
15:44:15 <sunwind> thank you
20:45:10 <takel> hello
20:46:27 <takel> does anyone know how to insert api level on dockerfile other than "env android_api 21"
20:46:38 <takel> i have some error here http://paste.debian.net/1161881/
20:48:20 <dsc_> takel: CMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION is the version of the operating system for which CMake is to build.
20:48:41 <dsc_> try -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION=21 or -DCMAKE_ANDROID_API=21
20:55:28 <takel> -DCMAKE_ANDROID_API=21  not found
20:56:32 <dsc_> takel: It's a CMake definition, you ought to pass it to CMake like: cmake -Dbla=ON -DCMAKE_ANDROID_API=21
20:59:11 <takel> ok i inserted on makefile
21:15:27 <takel> almost the same http://paste.debian.net/1161885/
21:17:07 <dsc_> takel: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48989644/is-there-a-way-to-prevent-cmake-from-enforcing-the-toolchain-layout-when-using-c