-
spoke0
regarding the announcement of the upcoming regulatory whitepaper: is this paper founded on existing regulatory methodology in EU US etc, and if how did they get this information. Aren't regulators usually interested in keeping there requirements unpublished?
-
fahrradflucht[m]
spoke0: What announcement are you referring to? - Also, what do you mean by "Aren't regulators usually interested in keeping there requirements unpublished?"? Isn't it normal to publish drafts so they can be consulted on in parliament and with the public?
-
spoke0
regulators like the US Treasury department, they don't publish what requirements are in detail put in place to prevent money laundering throughout US regulated financial services, there is a law in place to prevent money laundering and who should regulate that but there is no public information on what data exactly needs to be provided to which data collection.
-
spoke0
-
fahrradflucht[m]
ah okay I somehow thought you were talking EU, nevermind
-
spoke0
EU would be the same, let's take one of the more public EU data collection, SCHENGEN INFORMATION SYSTEM, it is known who can access it for what reason, but there is no information on what exactly is stored and how often new data is added.
-
spoke0
when it comes to financial data stuff is only shared with institutions that require a license and are eligiable.
-
fahrradflucht[m]
can't read up on that since www.europol.europa.eu is down 😅
-
lza_menace
emesik come back!
-
zib
bit unrelated but does anyone know if there's a way to limit the memory usage from "xmrblocks"? Seems to use the same amount as my monero daemon heh
-
selsta
Inge-: did you originally report this issue?
LedgerHQ/app-monero #79
-
selsta
did you mean tx creation with tx processing?
-
Inge-
Yes this was happening AS the transaction was being created by the Ledger
-
Inge-
Also side note, possibly more a monero-wallet-cli issue - once it locks and the ledger has gone to screensaver, even if you unlock the ledger, it was not possible to unlock the "cow screensaver" in the cli wallet
-
Inge-
selsta: ^
-
marqueze
how to create a v12 paper transaction
-
marqueze31
how to create a v12 transaction on paper
-
dsc_
-
marqueze32
is someone kicking me out of this channel?
-
marqueze32
why?
-
moneromooo
Some kicked you. Why, I dunno. You'd know, you kicked yourself.
-
Guest72945
lol
-
marqueze32
myself? i dont think so
-
moneromooo
Thought so.
-
vdo[m]
ecook5di
-
artefact
that password is now in everyone's logs
-
asymptotically
it's in the haveibeenpwned passwords list :P
-
anicow
i will make tinychat part of the future
-
selsta
saddam: can you confirm that you renewed moneroaddress.org?
-
saddam
selsta: yes it was renewed
-
saddam
by me
-
leonardus
does the GUI wallet take the fees out of the amount sent, or add it on top?
-
asymptotically
leonardus: it's added on top. if you enter to send someone 1 XMR, they'll get 1 XMR and you'll lose something like 1.00001 XMR
-
leonardus
Understood thanks
-
leonardus
Very impressed how low the fees are.
-
artefact
unless you send (all), obviously
-
artefact
but the wallet will show you a dialog with all info before the final confirmation
-
monerod[m]
Hm. seems i took to low fee on a TX, can i add some fees to a tx to speed it up some how?
-
artefact
not if it's been propagated to other nodes, no
-
vtnerd
not really :/
-
vtnerd
you cannot do child pays fees either because you cannot receive+spend an output in the same block
-
monerod[m]
crap, Automatic fees seems to not be recommended
-
artefact
in my experience, even lowest gets included fairly quickly in the chain
-
artefact
just wait, it'll be fine
-
monerod[m]
ive got 1 tx waiting for 2 hours, another for 1
-
monerod[m]
no confirmations, but the wallet that i sent it to does have it in pending
-
artefact
not possible, they're not in the pool
-
artefact
as you can see on xmrchain, the oldest tx the network knows about that has yet to be committed is about a minute old
-
monerod[m]
one of them is a tiiinty one that is now blocking a much larger amount to be spended ;D Fucking irritating ;D
-
selsta
yea, this is not a fee issue
-
selsta
are you using tor / i2p?
-
monerod[m]
hmm
-
monerod[m]
i am
-
monerod[m]
i2p
-
selsta
yea I guess the tx didn’t get propagated
-
selsta
CLI or GUI?
-
monerod[m]
GUI
-
artefact
output of monerod print_cn|grep i2p|grep OUT|wc -l ?
-
selsta
can you open in CLI?
-
selsta
the GUI currently has a bug where failed transactions get displayed as pending
-
monerod[m]
<selsta "CLI or GUI?"> is that fixable :S
-
artefact
yes
-
monerod[m]
puh ok
-
artefact
you can delete the transaction from your local txpool, wait until you have outgoing i2p connections, and remake the transaction
-
artefact
or skip step 1 and rebroadcast the old transaction, but you won't be anonymous
-
artefact
well, you will be, but we'll know that transaction with a 2-hour-old timestamp is yours
-
monerod[m]
<artefact "output of monerod print_cn|grep "> 0
-
artefact
you
-
artefact
*will probably notice one/several "Lost all outbound connections to anonymity network - currently unable to send transaction(s)" in your logfile
-
monerod[m]
i see
-
artefact
it's a known issue. you can somewhat mitigate it by using add-priority-node instead of add-peer in your config file, and restarting the daemon before making a transaction
-
monerod[m]
<artefact "you can delete the transaction f"> how do i delete it from my local tx pool?
-
artefact
monerod flush_txpool
-
d4ndo[m]
egrep -e "i2p" -e "OUT"
-
monerod[m]
and that will bring my "lost" xmr back in to the wallet?
-
artefact
they were never lost, but yeah
-
monerod[m]
yeah i know, Didnt find a better word^
-
monerod[m]
so CLI does not have this bug with failed Tx's?
-
artefact
the issue is with monerod, both wallet interfaces do their job by sending it the tx
-
artefact
arguably maybe they shouldn't allow you to do so when the node can't do anything with it because of a lack of outgoing connections, but that's another issue
-
monerod[m]
i see
-
selsta
monero gui only displays failed tx as "pending", it’s a label issue
-
selsta
the tx failing is not related to monero gui
-
monerod[m]
But it was caused by I2p missing outgoing connection?
-
selsta
yes
-
selsta
no outgoing connection means it can’t propagate your transaction to other nodes
-
monerod[m]
alright, Ah well. no stress
-
monerod[m]
Thanks guys
-
artefact
here's a wild case though. what if the node were to mine a block? the "failed" transaction would be included in it. and afaik blocks are propagated over regular peers?
-
artefact
i know it will never happen, but just for curiosity's sake
-
leonardus
5:17:25 PM <monerod[m]> crap, Automatic fees seems to not be recommended
-
leonardus
i got 10 confirmations in ~20 minutes with automatic
-
artefact
you get 10 confirmation in ~20 minutes with any setting, really
-
monerod[m]
Yeah, i was wrong, It had nothing to do with fees
-
selsta
artefact: afaik if you mine a block the tx would get propagated
-
artefact
a funny workaround
-
monerod[m]
<artefact "well, you will be, but we'll kno"> Curious as to what you would know more though ? Cant see amount or address sent to ? or am i wrong?
-
kayront
monerod[m]: go to
xmrchain.net over tor (if you don't want to link the lookup of your txid)
-
kayront
enter your txid (i didn't follow the entire convo, if this one was not broadcast, pick any older one)
-
kayront
that's what everyone can see about your tx, except they don't even know it's yours, unless it's the person you sent to
-
kayront
there's no public source, no public destination, no public amount, as you'll notice
-
monerod[m]
That is why i am confused about the comment
-
leonardus
I really should get into reading how monero works beyond "magic with ring signatures"
-
leonardus
sounds really interesting a cryptocurrency where you cannot see the sender or destination or amount in the blockchain
-
kayront
monerod[m]: imagine there were only 5 txs in a block from the timestamp we can infer based on your comments
-
kayront
then one of thr 5 is yours
-
kayront
that's what he meant
-
kayront
but even then, no amounts, no destinations, but one of the ring members is the actual one. but even then we can't be sure which
-
monerod[m]
i see
-
kayront
and soon enough other txs will use your real ring member as decoys, so very soon it becomes unknowable whether it was really you subsequently spending or not