<Stealthy> community.xmr.to server throws an internal server error so cant test any address <-- that instance had issue yesterday before your message apparently

yea i guess it was telling me bedtime

faucet stagenet still giving me rejected by daemon

so monerod is synced for stagenet and running, i setup the walletrpc service to connect to it, stagenet=1

i guess thats good on my end

i created a wallet through json rpc, i can open it, get_address getbalance, although it's 0

lemme sync up and send you some coins

someone sent me some stagenet xmr last night but it looks like that did not go through

if you created a new wallet maybe it isn't the same address

account_index 0

output looks good

i dont get why the xmr.to stagenet faucet rejects it, i wonder if it's something i did wrong

did somebody 51% the stagenet chain?

2020-03-05 09:51:03.583 [P2P4] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1839 ----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 530359

2020-03-05 09:51:03.583 [P2P4] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1839 id: <99256a01d6fe5f03c30513e97c56f308ec549e0bfe87c5ef038f929d6e33de6b>

2020-03-05 09:51:03.583 [P2P4] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1839 PoW: <8ba4af8d85ad7bddadb0678a6eb57bc637c5c5b8c91080335809694e26460000>

2020-03-05 09:51:03.583 [P2P4] INFO global src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp:1839 difficulty: 79227

bunch of those

so there were some conflicts of mining block at the same time

yeah i'm getting those while syncing all the way from 51xxxx

this is stagenet i guess it's a lot smaller and more prone to those kind of things

is mainnet questionable like that too?

because at this point i can still go for another coin, even though i like the idea of monero much better

if somebody has a lot of hashing power, sure :D

i mean aside from theory :P what is the current state of mainnet

Stealthy: ok i sent you some stagenet xmr to the address on your pastebin

sweet, lets see if that goes through

osnap, it did

looks like everything is set up to go then

and the mainnet is currently at 1.3 Gh/s. i think the stagenet sometimes goes quite a while without 1 block because there's nobody at all mining there

that makes sense

is that 5 billion xmr or lol

check the top of the docs page, it's 50 XMR but the api gives it to you in atomic units

i think 1e12 atomic units is 1 XMR

ah xD

btw, there's a nice website that shows you how much you'd need to spend on NiceHash to get 51% of the hashrate of some coins and rewrite some history. for some coins its quite scary

lol, wow

monero is not even on there, i guess its harder to 'datamine'

it used to be there, but i dont know if nicehash has randomx yet

either way the monero network hashrate is too big for nicehash, i think even if you bought it all out you'd still only have a few %

i don't have much of a clue on the technical aspects of all of this, barely scratching the surface really

apparently i can get balance for any account_index through the wallet rpc without having to do open_wallet

so i guess it's really just an interface to manage my local wallets created through the wallet-rpc

and i can reference them by their ID

and so it begins :P

instead of checking the balance you might want to do get_transfers. you can ask it for all of the incoming payments since block X

yep, eventually

now that i know that it's setup, im working on making the correct database models so i can work that into the app

use the correct corresponding rpc enpoint for stagenet and mainnet

get the respective account_index

then i'll work on keeping an eye on transfers

20G /var/lib/monero/

thats stagenet, how large is mainnet currently

guess i'll have to run both daemons

and two wallet-rpc's

Stealthy: i think it might be around 80gb now? but you can enable pruning to shrink it quite a bit

can i enable that at a later point?

ie when it gets too big

i made 4 services, 2 for monerod stage and main, 2 for wallet stage and main

kinda struggling for it to recognize my wallet again lol

you can enable it whenever you want, but it doesn't hurt to enable it now

i moved the old one to a new folder ie 'wallet_stagenet'

can't you just use the --wallet-file parameter of the rpc server?

i use wallet-dir

both walletrpc instances have their own dir

so that i can have multiple wallets potentially for both main and stage

but moving stuff around broke something

'no wallet file' and open_wallet gives 'failed to open wallet'

ah

2020-03-05 11:48:45.155 [RPC0] ERROR util src/common/util.cpp:282 Failed to open /home/monero/wallets_stagenet/stealthy_001.keys: Permission denied

2020-03-05 11:48:45.157 [RPC0] ERROR wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:5426 !is_keys_file_locked(). THROW EXCEPTION: error::wallet_internal_error

guess i need to re-chown

thank god that worked

i would just forget about the --wallet-dir and create_wallet calls and just create your wallets in advance

too far into that route to switch stuff i think xD

since it works now

will look into pruning though

well all you do is start the wallet with --wallet-file ./your-wallet --password-file ./top-secret-pw

and it just works :D

just went through systemd hell to setup the services xD

now i can just focus on my api to make sure to open-wallet the right one

although that might not be necessary i found last night as long as i pass the right ccount_index

at least for get_address and getbalance

i remember reading, some time ago, that you can configure the size when you configure prune, have to refind it again

then add it to the config for both instances

for now i have plenty space but better to figure it out now and not have to worry about it later

are there any downsides to that, asymptotically

i'd imagine if everyone pruned history, at some point its impossible to check validity back?

if you enable it later, you'll either have to only prune future data, or have some downtime while you delete the old stuff

i have enabled it but was thinking about it

also cleared the datadir and have them both syncing again

93M /var/lib/monero/stagenet/lmdb

93M /var/lib/monero/stagenet

7,8G /var/lib/monero/lmdb

7,9G /var/lib/monero

i think with moneros closed nature and when blocks are confirmed a certain amount it's fine to prune old data

no sense except datamining to keep a huge history

from that understanding it makes sense to enable pruning

Stagenet directory for me is only 5.49GB

earlier i pasted the total size, i think i had mainnet done at 60% or so as well

Mainnet is ~78.2GB not pruned

pulling 5~9 MiB/s we'll see in a bit

cpu graph is all over the place xD

lol

and after all that i'll have two endpoints for my application, one for stagenet one for mainnet, a number of wallets that BelongTo either one of them and then 'sub addresses' that belongto a wallet, and User hasmany subaddresses

then when i create a new subaddress i'll have to figure out how to setup callbacks for transfers

Atomic Swap app between Mainnet and Stagenet?

I have a lot of Stagenet coins... I can test your app all day long if you want.

no no i just want to be able to use Stagenet for my development build and Mainnet for production

Wrecking my whole day...

haha

when i get all this stuff wrapped up you can play with stagecoins

Stealthy: you probably want one wallet for the whole application, not a wallet per user

yep 1 stagenet wallet 1 mainnet wallet, just subaddresses for endusers

and every n minutes a new subaddress will be created and linked to a user

oh sorry i mis-read what you said above :p

lemme start up the gameserver real quick i'll show you

just tmp domain but thats where i push progress builds every now and then during tinkering

once i implemented monero it'll run on stagenet

for time being

every game consists of 10 million rounds; the start of a game is the hash of the monero blocked mined at that time

and it creates a hash chain of 10 million hashes based on a secret

the hash of the last block mined is the public key, that will give a result for that round

so for a new game it checks the latest mined monero block, that hash will be the publically known key which makes a result

it creates a hash chain of 10 million hashes based on a private key

have you seen monero.win? it's also based on the block hashes but not as complicated :D

never heard of it tbh ^^

its only 'complicated' technically :P it's to asure no tampering

for the end-user it's as simple as, where will the game bust, 2.00 has a change of 50%~

which would multiply your wager

by 2

everyone can verify the rounds result by knowing the public key

and the integrity of the hash chain, because every hash is the hashed previous round

Are you being paid to shill monero.win asymptotically ?

very muchly

good

i'll have to see how it works out

i know that in theory it should be possible to make subaddresses but i havent found it in the api specs

i guess its just create_address where the account_index is the actual account/main wallet

Stealthy: call create_address. it gives you the address and a subaddress index

you should probably just use the 0th account index as accounts are quite separate

i'll have the main wallet infos stored in database so that i can use it's correct index to create addresses upon

If I rent a dedi to mine Monero, obviously this is not going to be profitable. But what is the least unprofitable option?

hi there is there any privacy focus project that does funding or diferent softare hardware projects, were tokens are used for every commit? if you know what I mean

It seems like you could create a "synthetic VPS" that way. You rent a server for $40, then mine Monero for $N at lowest priority.

Whenever you get a request, the Monero mining gets seized up.

In this way, you pay $(40-N*unused_frac). A zero-cost discount.

VASTfreedomBot[m: no I do not know what you mean.

i cant even imagine for something like that to work at all VASTfreedomBot[m

xD

Signal does something remotely similar

trust in the monero network is one thing but you cant validate trust into any of its users

You get paid in Bitcoin per commit

VASTfreedomBot[m: i think that Bisq does something funny with tokens rewarding developers

per commit is a terrible metric though

yea

<Stealthy "trust in the monero network is o"> Im not really think on monero but maybe another project maybe based on monero blockchain that automates rewarding commits etc

<asymptotically " ׀VASTfreedom>Bot: i think that "> gona ask

<asymptotically "per commit is a terrible metric "> off course it would depend on the quality of the comit

n lines*award

xD

\r\r\r\r\r\r\r

<Stealthy "n lines*award"> probably the maintaneirs would grade the work

yea

and the depending on avaluation

asymptotically: Right, so what Signal does is use an honor system.

You put in a pull request, and you can choose (for minor stuff) to write "FREEBIE"

and they don't pay you

ok sounds good gonna reach out to them and check their source repos

so automated or not, you check through commits, grade work and make a transaction for whatever value

sounds simple enough

I believe because every commit should be reviewed its better not to be automated , making and incentive for code to be audited and eviewed by current maintainers

all backed by the same token

you could provide an interface for grading on a website

paid moderation maybe

unlocked after x rewards/honor whatever

why a new token though? why not just send xmr?

yea

no need to complicate it

you'll write a service that checks commits, loads them into your website database, they get moderated, funds gets transferred

i like the monero ccs system better

shit i'd work for ya

<asymptotically "why a new token though? why not "> could use the xmr blockchain, so is the same network but on top of it you would need to custamize it

but why? what am i going to do with worthless CommitTokens? i want xmr that i can buy things with :)

:P

you can always abstract the fact that its XMR by calling it Bananas

Also because the ideia is to make incentive for early developers to get involved , overtime with theire work the token would rise in prise

having to be an idependent token for evaluation sake

asymptotically: ^^

Stealthy:

why would it be worth anything at all though? especially if it's only issued by some central authority at their discretion

maybe thats the trick lurking in the shadow :p

but honestly i don't understand the concept of a token on top anyway so *zips*

Stealthy: tokens are a tool for separating a greedy fool and his magic internet money ;)

without understanding the technology i'd guess its something like a promise where you say, your Bananas are backed by my X amount of XMR on the actual chain

<asymptotically "why would it be worth anything a"> because this is not for speculation has most cryptocurrencies are. But for actual real projects that have commits every hour were there is actual work so there is gonan be a certain number of transactions per day making it vaue rise, most certainly. Imagine if debian would have suvch syste It problaby be worth quite enough. But I will procede to other channels to

ask on bisq and signal as sugested to see their own implementation of suchideia.

that doesn't answer the question. i understand they get paid out to developers, but what do developers do with them once they have them?

if they just exchange them, what was the point in the token?

> <@freenode_asymptotically:matrix.org> why would it be worth anything at all though? especially if it's only issued by some central authority at their discretion

* because this is not for speculation has most cryptocurrencies are. But for actual real projects that have commits every hour were there is actual work so there is gona be a certain number of transactions per day making it vaue rise, most certainly. Imagine if debian would have such system It problaby be worth quite enough. But I will procede to other channels to ask on bisq and signal as sugested to see their own

implementation of such ideia.

ok it's not for speculating. what's it for then?

Stealthy: fractional reserve banking ON THE BLOCKCHAIN

I promise my bananatethers are FULLY BACKED by deposits in "an (alleged to be) Panamanian entity"

lol

jokes aside though, the guy goes have sort of a point. CCS is cool but something more informal might be interesting

so, each issue gets an address automatically assigned, and its audit key is made public

so you post bounty into the address of issues you want people to work on

i like the idea in general but i dont think it has to be overcomplicated

i'm probably just too stupid to see the appeal

much more so to actually work that out; if anything i'd stick with the basic and keep data in mysql and call it done

^. no point in pretending its decentralised, might as well keep it simple

yea

Yeah ofc. The token nonsense is just ICO fraud.

There's no point to have it for legitimate business

MySQL is less basic, because then your software needs to be safe enough to actually handle money

here we can just keep a HW wallet and generate keys using the xpub

ok, i see your point

never considered the blockchain as a datastore

it'll be a slooow option though lol

was it you who said stagenet was 17G? i'm at 21G with prune on :/

starting to think i did wrong in the config file

prune-blockchain=true

i'm at 5.6G without pruning

oh i meant someone said mainnet was 17G

What datastore? You use it to manage your money

money goes into the bounty address, money gets paid out by someone with the key

i misunderstood thinking you meant using the chain to actually store (all) agreements

since you (arguably) can't trust a centralized store

i don't know how it technically works but i'd imagine using signed messages or some mechanism that i have not looked into yet

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

for the past 30 minutes i've been applauding myself being able to recover my current balance through json rpc is how noob i am

small victories

there's a centralized guy who runs the whole thing

who holds the HW wallet and who decides if he's going to pay out or not

the chain is just used to credibly demonstrate he has money in the account to pay, and to allow people to put money into the bounty pool without having to first transfer it in to a web wlalet

so i have a primary address, now let's say i have made 5 (sub)addresses for a specific user; his total balance is the return of get_balance, passing the indices for those subaddresses as the 2nd parameter;

now let's say this user spends 1XMR

do i initiate a transfer to the primary address

or keep those transactions separate in my database

and just deduct 1XMR from his get_balance

i don't think there are any fee's involved transferring between subaddresses?

how about time?

i think its best to use incoming_transfers and work out balances for yourself

then you dont need to do any funky subtractions

true, so you're saying monitor transfers to user-assigned subaddress, keep balance in my own database

it's a transaction like any other

yes, and keep a log of all events (incoming payment with txid ..., outgoing payment with txid ...) just so that you can avoid duplicates and keep track of everything

now here's another question then, in time my primary address balance will consist of the total balance of many subaddresses; can i transfer a given amount from the main address to any other external address?

or do i need to gather funds from subs

dont use get_balance and dont transfer funds between your subaddresses, it will just make things harder for no good reason

i did the same thing with bitcoin when it had an account system in its RPC. i think they got rid of it now because it shouldn't be used :o

so what i'm trying to understand is whether or not the balance is available for spending, from the primary address, regarding through whatever subaddress it came in?

let's say at some point i'd want to exchange for fiat and i'd have to transfer an amount to the wallet of some exchange service; can i just initiate a transfer from the primary address, while balances are, technically, divided over subaddresses

yes, subadddresses are pooled together. but accounts aren't afaik

sweet

that raises another question hahah

if total balance that came in from a number of subaddresses is 5xmr and i transfer 1 xmr externally, how does the wallet decide from which subaddresses to deduct the 1xmr

just index 0 to n?

it doesn't

each account has 1 balance

so just create and forget about subaddresses

other than monitoring incoming

sorry i think i ruined everything with my shitty explanations lol. the way i do it is only use the main account

and then create a subaddress for each user and poll incoming transfers

<Stealthy "i'm probably just too stupid to "> sorry i had to leave, the appeal is that many FOSS and OSHA projects die because of lack of funds. And although most people are voluntiers, the work they do mostly has some value.

i don't know what FOSS and OSHA are but i agree with what you're saying

<yanmaani "the chain is just used to credib"> correct the main diference is that you would use the actual git source code to make the desentralized system basically implementing the ideia brought about the reproducible builds project.

FOSS(free and open source software) OSHA(free and open source hardware)

basically freeware, public content.

ah yes

like unix projects like linux bsd, or arduino rasberrypi etc

what

VASTfreedomBot[m: where do the tokens enter the picture?

what purpose do they serve

what is the purpose of paying people in tokens when you might as well pay them in real money?

<yanmaani "what is the purpose of paying pe"> because you dont have real money. So you create your own tokens with out cost

<yanmaani " ׀VASTfreedom>Bot: where do the "> the tokens are linked to de source code

into the trash they go

and therefore you receive them with publishing your source. Having therefore also no need for proof of work. If you would use GIT as the bases the syncing of both branches would be the proof of work for the transaction?

<asymptotically "into the trash they go"> why is that

because they're useless

tokens are not useful for anything in most cases

just build dapps using the main coin

does someone know what's up with the xmr.to faucet

it really stops me from testing

keeps throwing rejected by daemon

Stealthy, which faucet?

Stagenet or Testnet?

stage

-4: transaction was rejected by daemon

Yeah, doesn't work for me either

You need some?

working on get_transfers polling

cant ask you every 5 mins :P

I think you can only get 3 txs from the faucet

There is a max.

per day per ip or something

it never worked once for me :P

set up two wallets

use one to send to the one your polling from

oh good thinking

;)

that means i have to write some transfer logic for my app or figure out the cli

the cli is easy

transfer <address> <amount>

lets see then

anybody got any idea how badly thousands of 4in/16out transactions would stick out on the blockchain? would these cause any privacy issues?

lol stinkballs, forgot --stagenet

which makes me wonder, i should not need two wallet-rpc instances if it can do either

anyway, dont get sidetracked stealthy

VASTfreedomBot[m: How is this money? Why will it have value?

Stealthy, use two wallets... I haven't looked into why because it's not important to me... but I have something going and when I send from the same wallet back to itself it doesn't really "see" the incoming tx.

So for testing that might be difficult for you if you run into the same situation.

But I'm using integrated addresses so maybe this is why

<Mochi102> Stealthy, use two wallets... I haven't looked into why because it's not important to me... but I have something going and when I send from the same wallet back to itself it doesn't really "see" the incoming tx <-- cause it consideres it's change

ahhh ok

Thanks

I never considered that.

ah i was being stupid, had the cli try and connect to wallet-rpc instead of daemon

monerod

lol

can someone spare some stagecoin for 77YCAKe4SFTTGBZC5dw8tkf8cfYQazN3VGsfe8kTyRNKepJu4nLeku6GokQQMhaqofhKs2wYVqUda2By52VbRJNwSiTvHco

or hold on lemme see if the faucet will take that addreses

pos -4: transaction was rejected by daemon

77... is that stagenet?

hold on

yea i used the GUI to connect to my stagenet daemon, then created an extra address

it says Stagenet in the top right corner

it is

sent you 20

You need more?

no way haha, 20 is more than plenty

thank you!

I usually sell them for 0.1 XMR Mainnet but this time you can have them for free.

oh they have actual value too?

lol... no

I'm kidding

i can see why when the faucet is fubar xD

lol

i wonder how quick the gui will pick it up

Should be right away... as soon as it's in the tx pool

Stagenet height is 530961

Are you synced?

yea

just checked log tho

2020-03-05 16:56:13.623 [P2P5] WARNING cn src/cryptonote_core/cryptonote_core.cpp:1900 There were 54 blocks in the last 60 minutes, there might be large hash rate changes, or we might be partitioned, cut off from the Monero network or under attack. Or it could be just sheer bad luck.

yeah this is normal

You can ignore that.

type "status" into the cli

sorry

using the gui :(

ph it has a cmd interface

What height does it say in the bottom right?

told me it cant connect to the daemon hold on its being stupid

the node is connected, dont know where that log comes form

Stealthy: are you using simple mode?

picked advanced and used localhost and correct port

did you choose stagenet before opening a wallet?

yep

is monderod on stagenet too?

yep

the gui even detects that it just finished syncing and all that

im pretty sure both mainnet and stagenet daemons are running correctly, it just finished sync for stagenet and mainnet is at 97%

does it somehow still try and run its own monerod

I don’t know if the GUI supports custom local port for GUI

at least partially because it knows that it just synced

maybe just not the command interface

under settings > log

what's stupid is that it notifies me about keeping local node running

while im clearly setup for remote

so it appears that it runs one anyway

or tried to*

cli instead

still 0 balance tho

if you type status, what does it report as the current height?

Refreshed 530976/530976, synced, daemon RPC v3.0, SSL

is there a way to find the list of addresses it made for the receive specifically

show_transfers returns nothing

trying to setup and use monero is humbling lol

Stealthy: type help and have a look at the arguments to the address command

and hmm it normally isnt this complicated lol

i think i messed up trying to use the GUI

i went to Receive and it made a new address

not sure if i can find any info on that back in the cli

ok i typed: address all

it returned my primary and the one made for receive

so that's good at least

typed refresh a bunch of times, it notified me that there were new blocks received, im guessing i'm all up2date

just not sure why balance returns 0

hmm maybe Mochi101 scammed you and didn't send anything :P

hahaha

He didn't pay me for the Stagenet coins.

hes like that noob, here have some more strugglebuns for dinner

what's the address again Stealthy?

<rbrunner7> You guys seem to have much fun here :)

1 77YCAKe4SFTTGBZC5dw8tkf8cfYQazN3VGsfe8kTyRNKepJu4nLeku6GokQQMhaqofhKs2wYVqUda2By52VbRJNwSiTvHco testing

txid is 77YCAKe4SFTTGBZC5dw8tkf8cfYQazN3VGsfe8kTyRNKepJu4nLeku6GokQQMhaqofhKs2wYVqUda2By52VbRJNwSiTvHco

actually its deacf48117c9d507f5fa9aa504cb4dac92074fac39c2daa3bd4410c941c769d7 - :P

77YCAKe4SFTTGBZC5dw8tkf8cfYQazN3VGsfe8kTyRNKepJu4nLeku6GokQQMhaqofhKs2wYVqUda2By52VbRJNwSiTvHco

oops

There's the tx

28 confirmations

so my monerod instance is not picking up on it i guess

Stealthy: Don't you mean scenejo?

who's scenejo

stagecoin =)

oh :P

noted, lol, still learning the lingo

2020-03-05 17:16:45.866 [P2P2] WARNING global src/p2p/net_node.inl:1823 No incoming connections - check firewalls/routers allow port 15001

I was just joking around, no idea if that's what they actually call it

is it necessary to run monerod open for it to work?

nope, you can work just fine with only outgoing connections

did you get the tx i sent a few mins ago?

[wallet 52Aqqm (out of sync)]: refresh

Starting refresh...

Refresh done, blocks received: 2

Currently selected account: [0] Primary account

Tag: (No tag assigned)

Balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

the one you sent me on the other wallet worked back then yea

i mean, the wallet appears to be fine, all i can think of must be monerod misbehaving

im going to be brave and restart it

nope

is there a way to check balance for a different index

maybe its holding the funds just not showing when i type balance

i probably did wrong going to Receive and had it make an address

well it would be a bit terrible if you could break it by doing that :D

i'm out of ideas :P

i need to disappear now. hopefully you can get this weirdness sorted out :{

thanks for the help :)

[wallet 52Aqqm]: show_transfer deacf48117c9d507f5fa9aa504cb4dac92074fac39c2daa3bd4410c941c769d7

Error: Transaction ID not found

what do you think, does that imply something wrong with monerod

since it seems completely oblivious of that transfer

<rbrunner7> Did you already make sure that stagenet did not fracture into two (or even more) subnets? So you are not even on the same net, so no wonder you can't see each other's transactions?

<rbrunner7> I am quite sure that such "subnets" are a real danger on testnet sometimes

<rbrunner7> With so few participants at times, and so low hashrates

<rbrunner7> If you submit a transaction, and you have a public explorer, and you don't see it within a few seconds in that explorer's pool display, something might be very wrong

good point @xmrmatterbridge

there were some conflicts

i dont know how to verify but, maybe

i feel tempted to switch to mainnet for testing

and buy some XMR

just to take all that crap out of the equation

rbrunner7: it seems like there was quite a big stagenet fork, thousands of blocks long

<rbrunner7> So at least at one point there was more than one stagenet, right? Or, as you already mused, maybe somebody 51% attacked the poor thing.

Stealthy: you can also make your own private stagenet, and then you can set the difficulty really low so that you can just make as many blocks as you want to push things along

you're really throwing me down the rabbithole today arent you

haha

:D

the easiest way i found to do it is to start with the existing stagenet chain but then add --offline --fixed-difficulty 10 (or similar) to daemon options. if you start your own from scratch you have to go through all of the hardforks/updates

i might just do that then

and then start_mining to get some quick funds?

although i dont know if that's what you're meant to do :p

yeah, and then you can attach as many wallets as you want and just send funds between them

the one i made previously should still be in the chain correct?

both of them

The daemon is running offline and will not attempt to sync to the Monero network.

lets see

just gotta kill mainnet because i dont have any cpu ticks left while that's syncing lol

lol wow, i wish mining was that quick on mainnet

Balance: 7733.992601285389, unlocked balance: 6957.032074208609 (59 block(s) to unlock)

xD

>:D

don't spend it all at once

wahaha

GUI picked it up too

i guess we were really in to different stagenet fractions

two*

since technically my stuff works

now that i'm in offline mode it should pick up transfers instantly?

they don't have far to travel :)

but who's going to confirm them

or should i keep mining

you confirm them whenever you mine a block

yep it worked

cool stuff

is it possible that the blockchain gets so busy that it becomes impossible to get in sync lol

or is that where difficulty and sizes come into play

Stealthy no its not possible, i think youre not going to do a fullnode on very very poor GSM or EDGE connection :D

that's what the dynamic block size is hoping to address

i'm on half a gbit but it has slowed down significantly the last few percentages

almost no network traffic

which made me wonder if its just dealing with a lot of work before fetching new data or am i just not getting any new data

because cpu-wise it's all over the place nonetheless

is it GUI ?

monerod mainnet

detached, i'm just checking the log file

just let it run, youll probably connect to other faster node later

on rapberry-Pi SBC with SD-card it took me nearly two weeks to sync the full chain

lol good thing i skipped that option

in two weeks someone could've postmailed you a card lmao

on Lapto with SSD harddrive it took me 4 hours once

When I run rpc commands like "print_cn" and the output is too large for my screen, is there a way to "less" or filter like a grep? I am trying to run rpc_payments and only see the lines where there is actually users that are earning RPC credits, but I cannot find a way to filter.

I assume I will have to run the rpc call over curl and then grep the output, but I was hoping there was an easier way

I feel like curl | jq is the easier way .shrug

pvols1979: you can run one-off commands from a separate process rather than in the daemon's console, e.g. `monerod print_cn | less`

@ndorf, that is what I needed. Thank you!

you're welcome

@ndorf, I have monerod running on a different port. Is there a command line option to specify the port? It is telling me that it cannot connect to the daemon. I looked through the options and I do not see one listed to specify

pvols1979: yeah, --rpc-bind-port and/or --rpc-bind-ip as necessary

e.g. `monerod --rpc-bind-port 18089 print_cn | less`

That doesn't seem to work. It tries to start a daemon on that port which is already bound to my running node

are you sure you specified the command at the end? it works for me

when get_transfers returns an item within the 'in' array

are they confirmed at least once at that point

it's kinda hard for me to test since using stagenet in offline on steroids, they are instamined and confirmed a bunch of times lol

been breaking my head over that one... since i run that query once every few minutes i guess i'll have to database a transaction even when its unconfirmed and keep checking back individual ones

been awhile but i think it also returns incoming txs in the pool

i think it only does that if you pass a parameter like pool: true

aah right

i turned pool and pending both off

so i guess anything it finds should be good

all that for tomorrow

gnite