15:45:24 If you're worried people might click, just put the domain name with a (dot). 15:45:43 And yes, this is an appropriate place unless you're shilling scammy stuff :) 15:55:19 https://monero.win isn't scammy 15:57:37 * asymptotically covers up backdoor 15:58:17 So I can't run out of the room? 15:59:08 * darsie downloads 0.15.0.1 Carbon Chamaeleon SHA256 Hash (GUI): 85a6885849d578691a09834c66ed55af4783ea8347b7784de9ea46e90995a57c 15:59:11 * Mochi101 hopes that a play on words makes asymptotically question his ability to be humorous. 16:00:16 Linux, 64-bit 16:02:50 Hmm, 0.14.1.0 has libs, plugins, qml, 0.15.0.1 doesn't. 16:03:36 yes it’s not required anymore 16:03:39 ok 16:13:43 How do I check what version daemon I'm running? 16:14:38 "version" 16:14:49 Where do I put that? 16:15:19 in monerod 16:15:58 Does that connect to the running monerod and queries its version? 16:16:50 If you can put it in monerod, it is the running monerod. If you can't (ie, you're running detached), then "monerod version" will do that. 16:20:02 I get the version of the monerod I'm launching, not the one of that's running. 16:20:31 Then it's running an old version, since this got fixed. 16:21:50 https://pastebin.com/SxVHT3UR 16:22:55 ps show me /home/bernhard/monero-gui-v0.15.0.1/monerod --detach --check-updates disabled --max-concurrency 2 16:23:10 nm i guess i got banned for posting the link on reddit and asking if its legit or not 16:23:36 Maybe it's not fixed then... 16:23:46 Heebnoid: you can pm it to me if you want 16:24:23 Ah, PR 6018, it's not been merged yet. 16:27:55 monero gui doesn't snap to desktop borders in xfce. 16:28:15 Only if I alt-mousdrag it. 16:28:48 Heebnoid: you posted a referral link to a 'free monero' site asking if it was legit. Debruyne responded probably not and removed your post. Ten minutes later you reposted it and were spamming your referral link, again, asking if it was legit, after debruyne told you otherwise. 16:28:59 You got banned. Read the sidebar rules. 16:29:07 I have no patience for scammers 16:29:50 darsie: Can you try Settings -> Interface -> Disable custom decorations 16:30:30 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/N32TSeUZ/Screenshot_20191124-113007_reddit+is+fun.jpg 16:30:35 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/T6p0Vs0v/Screenshot_20191124-113018_reddit+is+fun.jpg 16:30:57 I'll let the regulars in this channel decide if you should be unbanned. I suspect it'll be a resounding no. 16:31:07 reddit shows you who deleted a post? 16:31:08 :o needmonero90 spamming scam links :o 16:31:29 asymptotically: as a mod yes 16:35:11 moneromooo: unban or justified? 16:35:57 looks like spam rather than sincere information seeking. 16:36:27 The disaffected user came into IRC pretending they're innocent tho 16:36:36 ik 16:36:38 yeah, a spammer would just make a new account 16:36:55 Or, try to raise a stink 16:37:02 That's the other thing spammers do 16:37:13 Denial of service on everyone else's time 16:37:38 Reposting after it was removed tripped my red flags :/ 16:38:37 For reddit ? I don't care. 16:38:56 It does seem to me like the ref link was intentional. 16:39:11 *very* intentional 16:39:46 That said, they didn't post it here but asked. Shrug. 16:40:07 How old is the account? 16:40:27 Reddit.com/u/heebnoid 16:40:56 Half a year, but hasn't posted in a month or two 16:41:18 And before that literally shilled reflink services for doge 16:41:23 That's it 16:41:38 He looks like a negative value add, not even deadweight 16:42:05 y u do dis Heebnoid 16:42:21 Lol not only shilling reflinks, but doge admins deleted them all, and he kept posting them 16:42:28 Yeah no thanks, ban appeal denied 16:42:55 * needmonero90 bangs a conveniently located gavel 16:44:16 im not a scammer i didnt know i wasnt aloud to ask if that site was bad or not. i dont want people to click it if it is a bad site. i was only asking if it is legit or not. 16:44:30 * needmonero90 presses X to doubt 16:45:51 I wasn't sure, but assuming the doge history is accurate, you clearly knew. 16:45:54 idk wtf i did louipc . 18:57:12 thats fine dEB 18:57:56 again im sorry for causing a stink. i didnt mean to mess anything up. 18:58:04 Can you send us a reminder next sunday to lift your ban? 18:58:43 yeah that is fine 18:59:57 ty 20:16:50 So I made a transaction to my monero wallet before my blockchain has been fully synced. Will those funds be effected in anyway? 20:17:23 You'll see it once your wallet catches up. 20:17:39 thanks for the confidence in monero good sir 20:18:23 My node is literally massive, it's at 70GB+ right now 20:18:33 I did not expect this at all 20:19:19 sinaptik: You can prune it 20:19:51 how so? 20:21:25 monero-prune-blockchain (while monerod is not running). 20:21:53 It's apparently pretty slow on HDD. You need an extra ~25 GB (then you can delete the 70 GB). 20:22:19 should I do that once the sync is complete though? 20:22:30 I had to move from SSD to HDD because I ran out of space on my SSD 20:22:52 Doesn't matter. 20:23:04 yeah sure, but it'll be slow :( 20:23:32 If you're really out of space, you can delete the blockchain and sync again with --prune-blockchain :) 20:23:44 Then you only need the 25 GB. 20:23:52 argh O 20:23:55 I've come this far 20:24:00 I'm at 70GB+ 20:24:07 and I'm at 97% complete 20:24:10 might as well finish it 20:25:31 74.6GB 20:25:32 moneromooo: is there any way we can precalculate space available on drive before downloading? Then either suggest or auto set pruning from the outset if the chain is below X 20:25:45 X gb 20:26:14 74.6GB is total monero blockchain, BTC Core is 269GB. 20:26:21 Do you trust the people you'd ask ? 20:27:31 If you run your node in bootstrap mode, it can get this in get_info. 20:27:44 Quantized to 5 GB IIRC. 20:27:50 (up) 20:29:06 IIRC the GUI is pruning by default. 20:29:13 not yet 20:29:33 the problem is that we don’t know if the current daemon is pruned so we can’t simply start it with --prune-blockchain 20:30:11 You can start it normally, then check its height after it started. If < 5000, call prune_blockchain. 20:30:23 It'll be super fast at that height. 20:30:38 yea that would be a solution 20:30:53 if we do this existing blockchains won’t get pruned if I understand it correctly 20:31:04 Right. 20:31:20 Unless they really were < 5k :P