08:29:51 sgp_ while i agree with some of the changes, what you are proposing is a complete redesign of those pages, in some cases even completely changing the scope of the page. Which is fine, after an appropriate discussion, but not a priority at the moment. 08:30:36 beside, we had a light refresh of most of these pages recently, which means most of the text has been already changes and translators (some of whom where CCS funded) already worked on the new strings. 08:31:19 Changing the text completely once again will make necessary to remake that amount of work. This will result in english pages for a while. 08:31:53 I wish these idea would have come up few months ago, when the light redesign was in process, that would have made things easy. 08:33:00 bottom line: let's discuss the changes, but, beside the issues i mentioned, there are other priorities at the moment. 09:08:34 merges: 1425 1476 13:52:19 rehrar pushed for other changes but was mostly turned down (including by me, since he pitched an even broader scope) 13:52:40 I see the 4 I opened as about the bare minimum for an initial user "onboarding" flow 16:17:45 just let me redo the site you dweebs 16:17:48 :P 16:56:31 the last redesign broke half website and made us lose 2 years of SEO. Now the structure is much more complex. A redesign right now is not really a good idea imo. 16:57:09 btw, if you are thinking of proposing changes to the website, would be cool to discuss them here as well. 17:01:35 sgp_: btw as i commented, i agree with some of the changes, especially those that can be implemented without wording changes. I disagree with some and some need a broader discussion