07:46:14 .merge+ 1132 07:46:15 Added 16:52:20 .merge- 1132 16:52:21 Removed 17:26:02 ErCiccione[m] selsta or anyone: please review https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1133 17:26:42 looks good 17:27:05 thx 17:30:09 Oh too late. Did you check the hashes to make sure they are ok? 17:30:22 no wait there should be a github work for that now no? 17:30:28 nothing triggered 17:30:31 I did check the hashes 17:30:39 only 4 for GUI so it didn’t take long :P 17:30:46 ErCiccione[m]: it fails to import bF's key from the key server for some reason. need to PR it to just import from the repo instead 17:30:55 Oh yeah, true :P 17:31:05 asymptotically: alright. Thanks 17:32:07 Which key server(s) were being used? 17:32:15 Seems some of them can be very unreliable 17:32:22 Importing from repo seems safer anyway 17:32:47 binaryfate did you already upload the binaries on getmonero? 17:33:06 yes 17:33:10 updating as we speak 17:33:13 binaryFate: i missed your message a few days ago about the hashes and the redirects. are the binaries available at https://downloads.getmonero.org/gui/monero-gui-win-x64-v0.16.0.3.zip at the time of the PR? before you update the redirects 17:33:24 ok. Luigi1111 could you merge https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1126? 17:33:33 asymptotically I can make sure that they are if we make it the normal sequence 17:33:36 it's the blog post announcing the GUI now that the binaries are being uploaded 17:33:49 .merges 17:33:49 -xmr-pr- 993 1061 1070 1105 1108 1115 1119 1121 1122 1125 1126 1127 1129 1131 17:33:55 binaryFate: great, i'll alter the script to not follow the redirects 17:34:10 ok, we can try next time :) 17:34:34 ErCiccione[m]: we changed mac .tar.bz2 to .dmg, is there is place in website that has to change? 17:34:37 should be ok? 17:35:07 Yeah we don't mention that anywhere iirc. i'll double check 17:36:50 fluffypony can you flush CF? 17:36:55 yes 17:37:27 maybe better wait until the post is merged and online? 17:37:27 CDN as well? 17:37:33 I can do CDN 17:37:42 ok CF purged 17:40:24 I think merging hashes and blog post at the same time would be good to avoid double work 17:40:54 I can merge blog post given consensus on it 17:40:59 no one has confirmed the hashes 17:41:06 yes selsta did 17:42:01 selsta created the request 17:42:35 if you've checked them, feel free to approve and I'll merge straight away 17:42:43 otherwise I'll check in a bit 17:43:02 I'm confused. You mean no one has confirmed the hashes where? 17:43:46 in the blog post PR 17:45:14 I'll check 'em 17:48:18 done 17:51:04 oh yes oc 17:53:21 should I deploy site again then? 17:53:32 I have to go afk very soon 17:54:13 yes please 17:54:23 blog post should not require cf flush anyway? 17:54:39 no if it's a new entry I don't think so 17:58:29 fluffypony: first release with notarized dmg :D 18:03:36 should be good 18:07:49 Oh yes sorry. I reviewed selsta's pr but the hashes weren't up at the time. Forgot about it when i asked to merge. 18:51:12 selsta: awesome!@