05:17:38 <fluffypony> I think it's mostly standard cache times
05:17:55 <fluffypony> in other words, we aren't using cache hints to have it not be cached (not that cache hints are always adhered to either)
05:53:51 <fluffypony> downloads stuff is gong up via LFS now, all seems to be working well
05:54:14 <fluffypony> should keep the actual repo size pretty small (if you're not pulling down LFS files)
05:54:32 <fluffypony> we should consider switching to LFS for the big files in the site repo (eg. movies)
12:04:23 <fluffypony> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-downloads
12:04:24 <fluffypony> all done
12:20:14 <selsta> nice
13:20:14 <sarang> Whitepaper reviews added to `monero-site`: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1111
13:20:18 <sarang> CI still in progress
13:22:19 <ErCiccione> sarang: i already opened #1109
13:23:03 <sarang> So you did :)
13:23:33 <ErCiccione> yeah did it yesterday. I think i posted it here too :P
13:23:40 <sarang> I'd recommend adding to the `pubs` directory for consistency with other PDFs
13:23:46 <sarang> (1111 does this)
13:23:57 <sarang> ErCiccione: can't expect me to read _everything_ now!
13:24:09 <ErCiccione> Lol, you are right
13:24:34 <ErCiccione> sure, i didn't put them there beecause they are not "official" pubblication, but if it's fine for you it's fine for me
13:24:34 <sarang> Hooray, sarang wins!
13:24:46 <sarang> What would be official?
13:25:21 <sarang> The "unpublished" `ge_fromfe_frombytes_vartime` document lives there already anyway
13:25:34 <sarang> (not sure what "unpublished" is supposed to mean there...)
13:26:00 <ErCiccione> I meant "published" pubblications. Those PDFs are just comments of pubblications. Don't know if i explained myself properly here
13:26:22 <ErCiccione> nevermind. I understood your point :P
13:26:30 <sarang> oh ok
13:26:44 <ErCiccione> I'm probably rumbling nonsense right now
13:26:49 <sarang> I see your point
13:27:11 <ErCiccione> There are 38 degrees (celsius) here, i'll blame that
13:28:02 <sarang> jinkies
13:28:19 <sarang> I don't personally care where the PDFs live, directory-wise
13:28:56 <sarang> Merge whichever makes the most sense!
13:29:05 <sarang> And maybe I'll check for existing PRs before writing new ones =p
13:30:31 <ErCiccione> I'm super fast
13:31:07 <ErCiccione> I moved them to pubs: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1109
13:31:24 <ErCiccione> a review would be appreciated
13:32:46 <sarang> wilco
13:33:07 <sarang> Will it generate a new preview from the force-push?
13:33:37 <sarang> I'll check the code, but being able to directly test links in preview would be nice
13:34:08 <sarang> Silly question: any reason the `baseurl` is used for the `href` tags for the other papers, but not these?
13:34:12 <ErCiccione> yep
13:34:26 <ErCiccione> every force push triggers a new netlify preview
13:34:29 <sarang> k
13:35:44 <sarang> But yeah, the link format is different on the whitepapers apparently
13:35:47 <ErCiccione> That's the absolute url i used a relative url. No difference
13:36:18 <sarang> OK, no performance diffs?
13:36:35 <ErCiccione> We could keep everything the same for consistency
13:36:50 <sarang> Yeah, might as well use one format
13:37:01 <sarang> Oh, the netlify bot just updates its original comment; neat
13:37:03 <sarang> didn't see that :D
13:37:10 <sarang> I'll wait until you update and then test
13:37:14 <sarang> Or just use 1111 instead :D
13:38:40 <ErCiccione> pushed
13:44:24 <sarang> approved
13:45:18 <ErCiccione> what's 1111 i missed that reference?
13:45:51 <sarang> PR 1111
13:46:00 <sarang> did the same thing as PR 1109
13:46:09 <sarang> I just closed 1111
13:47:06 <ErCiccione> O yeah. Sorry man, today i am a bit off
13:47:13 <sarang> No worries!
13:47:18 <sarang> Looks like 1109 does the trick
13:47:30 <sarang> and preview links work fine
13:47:50 <ErCiccione> Perfect
13:48:10 <ErCiccione> .merge + #1109
13:49:21 <sarang> .merges
13:49:21 -xmr-pr- #1027 #1042 #1051 #1072 #1078 #1084 #1087 #1091 #1093 #1094 #1104 #1106 #1110 #937 #982 #993
13:49:53 <ErCiccione> -.-
13:50:02 <ErCiccione> alright, i'm gonna go get a drink or something
13:50:19 <ErCiccione> .merge+ #1109
13:50:19 <xmr-pr> Added
13:50:23 <sarang> .merges
13:50:23 -xmr-pr- #1027 #1042 #1051 #1072 #1078 #1084 #1087 #1091 #1093 #1094 #1104 #1106 #1109 #1110 #937 #982 #993
13:50:27 <sarang> winner
13:50:39 <ErCiccione> yaaay
13:50:44 <sarang> Too bad the bot doesn't list in numerical order
13:50:59 <sarang> Looks like it's lexicographic order
13:51:14 <sarang> Who runs the bot?
13:52:43 <moneromooo> dsc
13:53:34 <sarang> dsc_: possible to update the bot to list merges numerically?
13:53:54 <sarang> ErCiccione: are you waiting on review for other PRs right now that need to get in the queue?
13:54:00 <sarang> ^ thanks moneromooo
13:54:02 <sarang> :D
13:54:06 <moneromooo> And add PRs without using a # sign, it requires it for some reason. Or would it otherwise cause false positives ?
13:54:26 <moneromooo> Failing that, I'll stop forgetting with time.
13:54:34 <ErCiccione> Usually it did list them in numerical order
13:54:40 <ErCiccione> sarang: checking
13:54:48 <sarang> ErCiccione: was that when < 1000 ?
13:55:14 <moneromooo> lol, looks like you're right, it's alpha.
13:55:21 <sarang> The transition from 9xx to 1yyyy would ruin things
13:55:27 <sarang> s/1yyyy/1yyy
13:56:09 <ErCiccione> I think so. the bot already freaked out in past but now seems to be that.
13:58:48 <sarang> I wonder if its code is public
14:00:02 <ErCiccione> sarang: #1046 #1076 #1083 #1087 #1105 #1108 need a review or a final review
14:00:10 <ErCiccione> I wonder if its code is public -> it's not AFAIK
14:00:24 <sarang> k
14:13:21 <sarang> Reviewed 1046
14:14:46 <sarang> ErCiccione: is there a way to force a new preview build?
14:14:53 <sarang> 1076's preview has expired
14:16:06 <ErCiccione> Those are the old previews made with the free accounts that now got deleted. I can force push to trigger the new barolo-time previews
14:17:04 <dsc_> sarang: numerically? hmm.. Going to have to devise an algorithm... it will be hard, but I think I can do it
14:17:39 <ErCiccione> Done, it's building
14:18:49 <sarang> dsc_: really?
14:18:55 <sarang> How is it done now?
14:19:07 <sarang> Thanks ErCiccione
14:19:18 <sarang> Too bad the bot doesn't update its comments after previews expire
14:19:25 <dsc_> oof sarang, it's complicated. But I will persevere
14:19:35 * sarang can't tell if serious :/
14:19:54 <ErCiccione> That's because they are linked to different accounts. Previews don't expire afaik
14:20:06 <dsc_> hehe sorry it's /s    next update will have:
14:20:08 <dsc_> - numerical listing
14:20:09 <dsc_> - add without #
14:20:21 <moneromooo> Thanks :)
14:21:36 <dsc_> .merges
14:21:39 -xmr-pr- 937 982 993 1027 1042 1051 1072 1078 1084 1087 1091 1093 1094 1104 1106 1109 1110
14:21:46 <dsc_> .merge- 937
14:21:46 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:21:49 <dsc_> .merge+ 937
14:21:49 <xmr-pr> Added
14:22:59 <sarang> Oh, because the octothorpes look like channel links?
14:23:15 <sarang> dsc_: that was fast =p
14:24:08 <dsc_> Another satisfied customer!
14:25:01 <ErCiccione> dsc_: will it work anyway if i use #? i will 100% forget about the change
14:25:24 <dsc_> .merge+ #938
14:25:24 <xmr-pr> Added
14:25:26 <moneromooo> Sorry. I meant for it to be optional only :)
14:25:30 <dsc_> .merge- #938
14:25:30 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:25:34 <moneromooo> Nice.
14:25:34 <dsc_> ErCiccione: seems # still works :)
14:25:40 <sarang> tested 1076
14:25:50 <ErCiccione> nice. Thanks
14:26:00 <dsc_> in fact;
14:26:06 <ErCiccione> .merge+ #1046
14:26:06 <xmr-pr> Added
14:26:17 <dsc_> .merge+ blablabla111blablabla
14:26:18 <xmr-pr> Added
14:26:23 <dsc_> .merge- blablabla111blablabla
14:26:23 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:26:30 <dsc_> `re.findall(r'[\d]+', trigger.group(2))`
14:26:31 <dsc_> :P
14:27:12 <moneromooo> .merge+ not123
14:27:12 <xmr-pr> Added
14:27:17 <moneromooo> .merge
14:27:19 <moneromooo> .merge?
14:27:24 <moneromooo> .merges
14:27:24 -xmr-pr- 123 937 982 993 1027 1042 1046 1051 1072 1078 1084 1087 1091 1093 1094 1104 1106 1109 1110
14:27:30 <moneromooo> .merge- not123
14:27:30 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:27:50 <moneromooo> .merge+ 1e3
14:27:50 <xmr-pr> ...
14:28:22 <sarang> heh
14:28:24 <dsc_> .merge+ 1e12
14:28:27 <dsc_> .merges
14:28:28 -xmr-pr- 1 3 12 937 982 993 1027 1042 1046 1051 1072 1078 1084 1087 1091 1093 1094 1104 1106 1109 1110
14:28:31 <dsc_> ha :)
14:28:40 <dsc_> .merge- 1 3 12
14:28:41 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:28:51 <dsc_> bad mooo stop breaking my bot
14:32:49 <moneromooo> One last time, sir ?
14:33:11 <dsc_> okiii
14:33:13 <moneromooo> .merge+ 1 3
14:33:13 <xmr-pr> Added
14:33:17 <moneromooo> .merge?
14:33:19 <moneromooo> .merges
14:33:19 -xmr-pr- 1 3 937 982 993 1027 1042 1046 1051 1072 1078 1084 1087 1091 1093 1094 1104 1106 1109 1110
14:33:25 <moneromooo> .merge- 1 3
14:33:25 <xmr-pr> Removed
14:38:56 <ErCiccione> .merge+ 1076
14:38:56 <xmr-pr> Added
16:14:44 <sarang> CLSAG audit PR: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1112
16:14:48 <sarang> Please review ASAP
16:15:47 <ErCiccione> on it
16:17:13 <sarang> :D
16:17:16 <sarang> Waiting for CI preview now
16:28:40 <sarang> ErCiccione: making those changes now
16:29:42 <ErCiccione> Ok. i'm reviewing the rest
16:31:35 <sarang> sgp wants me to use the svg instead
16:31:55 <sarang> OK to just use that in the `img` tag? I don't know about browser support
16:32:34 <ErCiccione> Are you referring to the svg sgp_ is talking about or the liquid tag?
16:32:58 <ErCiccione> Let me test it with that svg, but shouldn't be an issue to use that instead
16:33:01 <sarang> the one he's talking about
16:33:04 <sarang> I'm adding it presently
16:33:11 <sarang> and the change you requested
16:33:13 <sarang> will push momentarily
16:34:42 <ErCiccione> browser support shouln't be a problem.
16:34:42 <selsta> +1 for svg, the old image was blurry on my phone
16:35:03 <sgp_> SVG is a nice to have
16:35:23 <sarang> almost done with new push
16:35:25 <sarang> one sec
16:35:43 <ErCiccione> the svg looks good
16:37:05 <sarang> also only 9 kB
16:37:11 <sarang> compared to something like 100
16:39:11 <sarang> force-pushed just now
16:39:28 <sarang> Let me know about the logo sizing
16:40:04 <sarang> waiting on CI preview
16:41:21 <ErCiccione> The logo is good
16:42:19 <sarang> Did the preview update with the force push?
16:43:10 <sarang> there it goes
16:43:53 <sarang> Looks good on my browser too
16:43:55 <sarang> Lemme check mobile
16:44:20 <sarang> looks good on mobile too
16:44:24 <sarang> fast loading too :D
16:44:28 <sgp_> so fast
16:44:50 <sarang> Can someone give a thumbs-up to the updated commit?
16:45:26 <ErCiccione> Forcing the width wasn't necessary, but doesn't hurt either
16:45:56 <sarang> I didn't know how it would be handled otherwise with SVG scaling
16:46:16 <sarang> Expanding to fill that page element seems like it'd be awkward
16:46:43 <ErCiccione> The width in the svg is 412px
16:46:50 <ErCiccione> it's good tho, no worries
16:47:10 <sarang> ah ok
16:47:57 <sarang> updated anyway =p
16:48:15 <ErCiccione> :)
16:48:17 <sarang> I know it'd bother me otherwise...
16:48:31 <sarang> What'd be the ETA on build/deploy?
16:48:34 <sarang> OSTIF's post is up
16:48:47 <sarang> I happen to like my post better, but I'm obviously biased :D
16:49:58 <sgp_> I like yours better too :p
16:50:30 <ErCiccione> Just one minor thing sarang: could make bold "tests indicate that users will see a 20% improvement in signature verification, and at least a 10% overall improvement for typical transactions!"?
16:50:50 <sarang> can do
16:50:50 <ErCiccione> would be good to have some @ links to the moneropedia for words like "transactions", but that's not really important
16:50:58 <sarang> I'll do the bold right now
16:51:02 <sarang> Other links could be done later?
16:51:45 <ErCiccione> Sure, no big deal.
16:52:01 <sarang> done
16:56:43 <ErCiccione> just left my approval
16:58:03 <ErCiccione> sarang: About the ETA: If luigi1111 is around we can merge and fluffypony, binaryfate or pigeons could deploy
16:58:24 <luigi1111w> why are there so many merges
16:58:25 <luigi1111w> .merges
16:58:25 -xmr-pr- 937 982 993 1027 1042 1046 1051 1072 1076 1078 1084 1087 1091 1093 1094 1104 1106 1109 1110
16:58:29 <luigi1111w> can you all calm down
16:59:07 <ErCiccione> .merge+ #1112
16:59:08 <xmr-pr> Added
16:59:10 <ErCiccione> get one more!
17:04:23 <fluffypony> LOL
17:04:24 <fluffypony> .merge+ all the things
17:04:46 <moneromooo> .merge+ all the th1ngs
17:04:46 <xmr-pr> Added
17:04:49 <moneromooo> Oops
17:04:51 <fluffypony> LOL
17:04:57 <moneromooo> .merge- 1
17:04:58 <xmr-pr> Removed
17:06:11 <dsc_> wut?
17:06:17 <dsc_> .merge+ all the things
17:06:22 <dsc_> ah ok
17:07:05 <sarang> The blog post is the biggest thing, since OSTIF have already posted theirs
17:09:46 <ErCiccione> yeah luigi1111 please merge 1112, the rest can wait
17:10:25 <luigi1111w> done
17:11:09 <sarang> Thanks! Let's get that deployed!
17:11:30 <ErCiccione> fluffypony ^
17:14:14 <sgp_> Who needs sports when you can watch this
17:22:10 <sarang> Fluffy has pinged others for the build
18:02:34 <sarang> Looks like no response yet :/
18:02:41 <sarang> binaryFate pigeons
18:03:30 <fluffypony> spoke to pigeons - we don't want to break binaryFate's stuff, we'll find a uniform way of doing this going forward so this doesn't happen
18:04:51 <sarang> I see
18:05:20 <sarang> Like a checklist :)
18:18:38 <sarang> Anyone know if binaryFate will be online today?
19:42:24 <ErCiccione> Probably better to PM him. Haven't seen hin online much lately.