01:30:21 -xmr-pr- selsta opened pull request #1266: user-guides: update fingerprint
01:30:21 -xmr-pr- > https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/-/merge_requests/1266
08:02:02 <Guest22839> selsta: don't we have to move from gitlab -> github anyway? Dunno
08:02:54 <Guest22839> netrik182: that's my fear too. I think that if we aim to have many questions, maby would be better to have a TOC and then all the questions already open (without needing to click on them)
08:15:36 <Guest22839> .merge+ #1266
08:15:36 <xmr-pr> Added
12:00:56 * ErCiccione[m] uploaded an image: Screenshot_2020-04-02  FAQ .png (198KB) < https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/esNkPwvSxWazBJPiyjdqoJsD >
12:01:02 <ErCiccione[m]> I'm going for this structure instead ^
12:01:44 <ErCiccione[m]> consider the 2 blocks on the top will be smaller and not everything is styled yet
13:18:42 <netrik182[m]> Looks good. Then it'll be possible to have placeholders pointed to the answers
13:19:03 <netrik182[m]> And use them outside getmonero as well
16:20:29 <sarang> Is the site down?
16:21:46 <moneromooo> Looks down to me.
16:22:38 <selsta> I pinged fluffy
16:23:29 <selsta> Datacenter has power outage
16:23:49 <sarang> oof
16:32:03 <ErCiccione[m]> Nice
16:32:22 <ErCiccione[m]> netrik182: They are not in the screenshot but i already created anchors for that very reason
16:32:46 <ErCiccione[m]> So we can point people to a specific question
19:18:52 <selsta> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/892
19:23:33 <sarang> This would handle what, site builds after pushing commits?
19:23:53 <selsta> also when opening PRs
19:24:44 <selsta> we could also deploy every PR/build to a testing area so that it easier to review things but I see problem with it getting abused
19:25:50 <sarang> At least for me, getting build tests on pushes would be more useful, since I don't have a local site build setup
19:26:11 <selsta> what do you consider a build test?
19:26:45 <selsta> it tests if the website builds fine but you can’t open the website
19:26:52 <sarang> Right, that's what I meant
19:27:28 <sarang> But that's helpful for me, at least, for the few types of PRs that I make for things like updating the list of papers
19:27:35 <selsta> right, this is possible but we have to make sure it doesn’t get abused
19:27:49 <sarang> It'd be the same risks as the main project has, no?
19:28:01 <selsta> what risks does the main project have?
19:28:21 <sarang> I presume whatever limits GitHub places on CI actions
19:28:26 <sarang> Isn't that what you meant?
19:28:39 <sarang> Right now, every push I make for project branches have several CI actions for build and test
19:28:46 <selsta> yes
19:28:59 <selsta> I see risk in people linking to malware and then trying to link the website around
19:29:31 <sarang> Is this a risk with just testing that the site builds?
19:29:54 <selsta> no
19:30:00 <sarang> Oh, you mean the risk only exists with some kind of test deployment
19:30:01 <sarang> got it
19:30:04 <selsta> yep
19:30:09 <sarang> Yeah, that seems reasonable
19:30:30 <sarang> and TBH for me at least, just knowing that I didn't screw up something obvious that breaks the build is good to know
19:30:39 <selsta> it is better than nothing, yes
19:30:42 <sarang> and it doesn't require that PRs have people test the build specifically
19:30:54 <sarang> thereby removing some work
19:31:26 <selsta> we could make a bot that deploys the site on a comment
19:31:30 <selsta> so that people can check the changes first
19:32:24 <selsta> just an idea
19:36:58 <sarang> How would that work? Not sure I follow
19:39:12 <selsta> a maintainer / trusted person writes !deploy and the bot would reply with a link were the website is deployed
19:39:33 <selsta> so that it can get testsed
19:39:39 <selsta> without having to build it manually
19:41:25 <sarang> and then it dies on some timer?
19:41:33 <selsta> but writing such a bot sounds like a lot of work with rather little benefit :)
19:41:42 <selsta> yes the website would get deleted after 1 month or so
19:42:13 <sarang> Isn't there some quote about how many programmers prefer writing tools than writing other projects? =p