10:13:41 <Mochi101> ErCiccione[m], since you're cleaning up the Monero Merchants links... Maybe it's time to remove the link to Monerodice.net unless it'll some day be updated.
10:14:09 <Mochi101> fluffypony?
10:17:12 <ErCiccione[m]> Is it not functional?
10:20:06 <ErCiccione[m]> unrelated: Most of these PR need a review: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/merge_requests?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=opened&author_username=erciccione
10:20:08 <Snipa> Says it's not across the top of the page.
10:21:14 <ErCiccione[m]> Oh yeah, i somehow managed to miss that banner. Will remvoe the link in few minutes
10:22:56 <Mochi101> ErCiccione[m], betting has been disabled for at least 2 years.
10:24:03 <Mochi101> Thanks, and sorry fluffypony.
10:24:49 <ErCiccione[m]> No idea, i never used it
10:25:03 <ErCiccione[m]> Mochi101: Removed it. Thanks for spotting it.
11:01:03 -xmr-pr- erciccione opened issue #1034: Add RandomX Moneropedia entry
11:01:03 -xmr-pr- > https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/issues/1034
12:08:22 <ErCiccione[m]> So, what about the Technical Specs page? https://web.getmonero.org/technical-specs i'm updating it, but at the end is it really needed?
12:09:17 <sarang> Who is the intended audience? And does the information help them?
12:09:50 <ErCiccione[m]> We could add those info somewhere else, right now, beside being outdated, they are not very informative
12:09:58 <sarang> It isn't a protocol specification, and I don't know how much a potential reader cares about how block size and penalties are computed
12:10:00 <ErCiccione[m]> exactly. The answer to those questions is not obvious to me
12:10:28 <sarang> It's hard enough getting definitive up-to-date protocol specs in any _one_ place
12:10:54 <sarang> and having out-of-date information on protocol IMO is worse than not having it
12:11:21 <ErCiccione[m]> Agreed
12:12:27 <ErCiccione[m]> We could add some generic info in the "About" page. Info aimed for non-technical people. Tech-savy folks will find the info they need in more detail in zero-to-monero and other resources
12:17:05 <ErCiccione[m]> Opinions?
12:17:08 <sarang> Having a barebones "technical specs" page also just feels kind of scammy
12:17:41 <sarang> History tells us that if you have to say you're not a scam, you're probably a scam =p
12:52:47 <Mochi101> Nice to see the block time and such.
12:59:11 <SerHack> ErCiccione[m]: Why not adding a link to Mastering Monero? I think it may be understood as the main resource written for Monero newbies.
13:00:48 <ErCiccione[m]> SerHack: We could just link to the library, so that people could choose the source they prefer according to their needs (Both zero to monero and mastering monero are there)
13:01:38 <moneromooo> tbh monerodice is close to scammy now. It's supposed to fix the attempted scam at some point, and is said to be coming back soon for years now. It seems mighty fishy.
13:02:24 <moneromooo> I asked pony a couple times and it was some sort of noncommital "on the back burner" IIRC. For years.
13:03:06 <SerHack> That seems perfect for me ErCiccione