09:22:10 .merge+ #1195 09:22:10 Added 09:22:26 ^ it's the PR which removes /r/monerimining mention from getmonero 09:56:37 .merge+ #1181 09:56:37 Added 09:56:40 .merges 09:56:40 -xmr-pr- #1181 #1182 #1192 #1195 10:00:05 ErCiccione[m]: I think a third person should approve 1195 10:00:24 Let’s not rush it. 10:03:59 I added it because also binaryfate agreed with the removal in -community 10:06:17 maybe binaryFate can comment on the MR so that it doesn’t look merged without any discussion. 10:13:48 Fair, i should have probably added the log of the discussion in -community. 10:13:49 .merge- #1195 10:13:49 Removed 11:17:18 .merge+ #1195 11:17:18 Added 11:24:56 Added a comment on PR 11:32:53 ty 13:53:16 https://paste.centos.org/view/raw/9b91b7a9 13:53:25 ErCiccione[m]: those are the options (paste expires after a day) 13:54:12 I personally like monerowwwuoyl4xt44i36ixpdkz5lbrefftiu27fxwimac4sqp527sad.onion 13:54:32 because it's easy to remember that it ends in "sad" which is what you'll be if you don't use a privacy-enhancing cryptocurrency 13:55:31 (also verifying the monerowww start and the sad.onion end should be safe enough for most people) 13:58:44 monerotor sid is cool too 14:00:17 monero tor security identifier onion 14:00:25 I still have a few Xeon boxes crunching at it, we can give it another few weeks and see if there are any more that are of use 14:00:53 let's revisit this at the end of Jan and make a firm decision then - is everyone ok with that? 14:01:28 monerowww reminds me of the facebook address 14:01:44 facebookcorewwwi.onion 14:02:45 the prefixes I'm targeting are: monerowww getmonero moneroweb monerotor moneronion 14:02:49 I really want a moneronion one 14:02:52 but haven't hit any yet 14:04:27 if still in the realm of feasible, adding [0-9] after prefixes would makes them more readable 14:04:35 or a capital 14:05:01 monerobeijing 14:05:05 binaryFate: no capitals 14:05:08 also can you put pump instead of sad 14:05:12 ah :( 14:05:13 lol 14:05:16 and they all end in d 14:05:21 so no pump 14:05:45 with the prefix it will catch everything including those with numbers after 14:05:53 so we'll see end of Jan if we have anything more memorable 14:20:24 I have a few questions on translations... who knows details on this? 14:42:30 ^ ErCiccione[m] 14:49:44 Fine for me, if we can consider my ccs completed anyway :) Last step was to get the onion mirror up and working. 14:49:54 Sarang shoot 14:52:56 I'm adding a new paper to the MRL archive and didn't recall the specifics of what to mark in translation language files 14:53:03 IIRC you wanted the "translated" flag to stay "yes" 14:53:14 but to have English versions of all the strings included in each language file? 14:53:26 ^ ErCiccione[m] 14:57:59 We don't have a "partially translated" kind of warning. So i would say if there is a good amount of english text, better change to "no" so to trigger tje warning. Now there are two papers in english only, so i think would be better that way. 14:58:27 Wait 14:59:10 If you are talking about the english section, if there is a "translated" field should stay to "yes", 14:59:51 For the other languages depends by the amount of translated text, as i said above. 15:00:24 Anyway sarang, just do the english part if you prefer, i will check all the other languages one by one 15:00:50 (Sorry for the confusing writing) 15:01:13 I'm adding a link to our new IACR paper, so there would be a title string and an abstract string, like for all the other papers 15:01:35 So I should add the English strings to all languages, and then flip the translated flag to "no" on all non-English language files? 15:02:30 I don't mind adding to all of them; I want to make sure it's done correctly, that's all 15:13:48 Sarang: if there is more english than localized text in the non-english files, yes, better put "translated=no" if the non-english file is translated and only title + abstract of new paper is in english, better leave translated "yes". 15:14:01 OK, will leave as "yes" 15:14:38 Note that the paper itself is only in English presently 15:15:21 Should have the MR finished up soon 15:15:25 thanks ErCiccione[m] for the info 15:15:41 Might have another MR within a few days for an update to the CLSAG title and abstract as well 15:15:49 we're in the process of finishing up a big rewrite on it 15:16:16 Alright. Don't think it will be translated soon :). 15:16:40 The paper or the strings? 15:17:05 The paper. At least not from the localization workgroup i think 15:17:10 I wouldn't expect anyone to do a full translation of the paper! That seems like a ton of work 15:17:47 Yeah that's what i meant. We don't really have many translatora at the moment 15:19:10 Anyway, will review the pr later this evening if it will be ready. 15:33:02 Thanks, it should be 20:36:28 Some of my PR on https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/merge_requests has been opened for weeks, please review some when you folks have a chance :) 20:36:45 Like: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/monero-site/merge_requests/1177 20:37:11 it's a bugfix and it's sitting there since 3 weeks ago