14:06:45 <xcztlaarsubw> I think everyone here knows that most Monero exchange withdrawals and desposits are traceable (Breaking Monero - poisoned outputs). How does it feel to go out and lie to people that they are private and then earn less than holding BTC on your bag?
15:29:53 <sgp_> https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/WRIjqKTZ/RoughTimeline
15:30:05 <sgp_> Rough times of the two major options ^
15:30:57 <sgp_> dEBRUYNE knaccc ArticMine sarang sethsimmons
15:31:04 <sgp_> sorry I don't have Project anymore :p
15:40:55 <knaccc> sgp_ very cool
15:42:02 <sgp_> this is my best attempt a putting pen to paper
15:43:32 <knaccc> oh yeah, i really enjoyed your presentation on kyc/etc stuff
15:46:43 <sgp_> thanks! the one from yesterday?
16:06:45 <knaccc> yes the one one youtube
16:14:13 <sgp_> cool
16:14:18 <sgp_> any thoughts on the timeline?
16:24:20 <gingeropolous> i like the latesummer HF for BP+ just merely to get the network on the same client asap
16:25:35 <gingeropolous> i really can't speak to the timelines for triptych R&D.
16:25:56 <gingeropolous> re: BP+ audits, did you reach out to the same folks that did randomx?
16:26:15 <sgp_> gingeropolous: yes, not trailofbits though
16:26:20 <sgp_> I don't have trailofbits contact
16:26:26 <gingeropolous> hyc, ^ ?
16:26:37 <sgp_> let me paste the email I sent
16:26:46 <gingeropolous> i wanna re-read those docs they provided, but I remember that some of them just seemed more better than others
16:27:00 <gingeropolous> though, this is a different beast i guess
16:27:01 <sgp_> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/8y0QgCNS/email
16:28:38 <gingeropolous> email addies for tob in old audits: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/blob/master/audits/Report-TrailOfBits.pdf
16:28:42 <gingeropolous> unless those don't work no more
16:29:38 <sgp_> good catch, emailing now
16:30:46 <hyc> SoWs are still online too
16:31:00 <sgp_> emailed
16:31:06 <hyc> https://github.com/hyc/RandomxAudits/
16:31:53 <gingeropolous> 2 years ago. wow
16:31:53 <sgp_> so I contacted JP, QuarksLab, Kudelski, TrailofBits
16:32:21 <hyc> yeah, time is flying...
16:32:24 <sgp_> emailing X41 now
16:34:12 <sgp_> sent
16:37:36 <gingeropolous> so code exists for triptych right?
16:37:47 <sgp_> https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/l7x3gn/looking_for_another_bulletproofs_auditor/
16:37:56 <sgp_> gingeropolous: yes, sarang would know best
17:38:57 <sarang> Triptych prove and verify routines are coded
17:41:43 <moneromooo> Is that code intended to be production quality ?
21:01:36 <sarang> There may be additional optimizations possible, but it should be close to auditable as is
21:01:49 <sarang> I'd need to give it a once-over after reviewing optimizations
21:41:52 <moneromooo> Great, thanks. I meant it as "is it a suitable candidate to plug into consensus". Since you often point out research code is not suitable for production :)
22:10:21 <sarang> At this point I think the function structure is suitable for consensus code
22:10:31 <sarang> Internal guts of functions may be subject to more optimization
22:13:36 <moneromooo> Sure, that's totally fine.