15:42:58 Meeting tonight? 15:43:15 Meeting is at 17:00 UTC 15:43:16 .time 15:43:17 2020-07-01 - 15:43:16 15:43:19 good bot 15:43:53 ty 16:54:43 Meeting will start here in about 5 minutes 16:59:30 OK, let's get started with the meeting! 16:59:38 As always, GREETINGS 16:59:41 hello 17:00:25 o/ 17:00:26 Hi 17:01:25 Salutations 17:02:55 On to ROUNDTABLE, where anyone is welcome to share research of interest 17:03:23 It was a fairly quiet week for me; I haven't been feeling well, and didn't get as much done as I had hoped unfortunately :/ 17:03:56 That being said, I've been actively working on finalizing all the CLSAG preprint changes that resulted from the auditors' suggestions 17:04:14 One piece of that, the linkable anonymity proof, has proven (pun intended) much more subtle than I had expected 17:04:29 But now I'm quite confident that a new proof is much better 17:05:54 The original proof didn't go into enough detail, and on review there were some things related to oracle access that I didn't like 17:06:17 Does anyone have comments or questions relating to this? 17:06:33 Once these changes are completed, I'll post a revision to the preprint on IACR 17:08:45 OK, does anyone else have research topics they'd like to discuss? 17:10:24 Two articles coming out of the quantum research soon. One is just a background recap from the proposal, but the other is an in-depth discussion about the algorithms of interest, which I think y'all will enjoy. Drafts premature to share, but expected by next week. 17:10:52 Nice! Any big takeaways? 17:11:28 Haha it's like a 9-page article right now, let me distill it down and get back to you later xD 17:11:59 That's all from me. Need to hop into another meeting soon, so apologies if I disappear 17:12:11 OK, thanks Isthmus 17:12:20 I shall eagerly await the articles 17:12:53 Does anyone else wish to share research? 17:13:36 An old thing, but I recently got a link to https://github.com/zawy12/difficulty-algorithms/issues/30 and I thought the difficulty adjustment algorithm might be a good one to go through if anyone statistics minded wanted a project. 17:14:01 It does feel like a "danger, don't touch until it breaks" subject though :) 17:14:21 Heh 17:14:22 Hello, I'm half paying attention today 17:14:33 Good point that it would be useful to revisit 17:14:58 sgp_: did you have anything you wished to discuss? 17:15:10 @mooo I'm intrigued 17:16:05 That was from the tari channel fwiw. They're looking at it now. 17:16:30 "Timestamps on newly-seen blocks are allowed to be in the past up to network delays. This prevents reorgs. But POW allows indefinite delays which allows reorgs of indefinite length" < something about that feels funny to me 17:16:59 I'll ponder on it 17:17:06 sarang: nope, just bumping coinbase rings as always I suppose for comment 17:17:27 So am I 17:19:06 sgp_: there was a good comment on the coinbase-only issue about the importance of weighing any implementation risks against the benefits 17:19:15 and I think that's entirely valid 17:19:55 Sure, something moneromooo and others would be more qualified to explain 17:23:53 All right, are there other topics to discuss from anyone? 17:25:30 In that case, on to ACTION ITEMS 17:25:42 More proofs, updates, and edits to the preprint for me 17:26:02 Oh, I'll be giving a remote talk on privacy tomorrow, which will be fun 17:26:35 And the Lelantus preprint got a major security model update that I want to investigate in more detail 17:26:44 Anyone else? 17:27:00 Looks like several people were just dropped from the channel... 17:29:14 Well, I suppose can adjourn early then 17:29:25 Thanks to everyone for attending! A quiet week, but that's ok 17:29:33 Logs will be posted shortly 17:36:12 Remote talk to whom? 17:36:58 A group at MakerDAO, who regularly invite speakers to talk about the ecosystem 17:37:16 There's no compensation or anything, just a good opportunity to talk about technology and cryptography 17:37:29 join #monero-audits moneroauditworkgroup