-
sarangHello all
-
sarangWorking on a deep dive of Bulletproofs+ today
-
sarangSome parts seem to switch up notation for no good reason :(
-
sgp_it might be better to contact them first with a list of general questions before doing a deep dive, since the efficiency gains don't seem huge
-
fluffyponysarang: have you seen the Tari Labs stuff on amortization of the bulletproofs inner-product proof?
-
fluffyponyit's funny how the inner-product proof is becoming the focus area
-
sarangThe IPP is where the magic happens
-
sarangSize benefits, delaying verification to a single round
-
fluffypony
-
fluffyponyfor those that haven't seen it
-
sarangLooks like the Bulletproofs+ construction should be ever-so-slightly faster than Bulletproofs overall
-
sarangIt's not clear why the authors saw a slight performance hit compared to the dalek BP library
-
sarangAnd, as has been pointed out, it saves 96 bytes per proof, regardless of the number of aggregated outputs contained therein
-
sarangAlso interesting is that the prover is more efficient as well
-
sgp_so you think the verification should be more efficient too?
-
sarangNegligibly, but yes
-
sarangRIP matrix apparently
-
UkoeHB_Maybe the dalek library is better optimized
-
sarangMost likely
-
sarangWould depend on precisely how they implemented BP+