05:40:18 <derpy_bridge_> <[keybase] seddd>: <3
16:07:47 <sarang> Hello all; working on debuggin some Triptych optimizations today
17:38:12 <sarang> Hooray, bug squashed
18:16:57 <sarang> https://github.com/SarangNoether/monero/commit/432b60df2ceead39e9a43f3e19da5a1ec53d81b0 now includes proper Fiat-Shamir transcript hash challenges
18:22:08 <sarang> Should have some better comparison data once I make a few more optimizations
18:48:32 <derpy_bridge_> <[keybase] seddd>: +1
18:51:19 <derpy_bridge_> <[keybase] seddd>: Just finished reviewing clsag sig gen in moneromooo's branch, doing a deeper dive this week. Is moneromooo's branch still the most recent clsag code?
18:52:18 <sarang> Use this branch: https://github.com/SarangNoether/monero/tree/clsag-device
18:52:43 <derpy_bridge_> <[keybase] seddd>: Ok, ty 🤗
18:52:59 <sarang> It adds two commits onto moneromooo's `clsag` branch: one for clearing certain prover data after signing, and another to offload certain device-specific functionality for use in ledger
18:53:28 <sarang> There is currently a PR for that branch that actually includes the ledger code, which I have yet to review
18:53:34 <sarang> (feel free to do so if you would like!)
18:54:21 <sarang> The PR in question, from cslashm: https://github.com/SarangNoether/monero/pull/1
19:46:53 <derpy_bridge_> <[keybase] seddd>: Definitely, will take a look. Huge hw wallet fan
19:48:06 <sarang> Great, thanks
20:31:53 <sarang> Triptych optimization that shaves 15% off the original verification time: https://github.com/SarangNoether/monero/commit/cc6e44ba2c2790e680eaf895f6f1cf8bf4216eb2
20:39:59 <dEBRUYNE> Nice one :D
20:40:40 <sarang> Running some MLSAG/CLSAG comparisons at small ring sizes just for fun
20:44:35 <sarang> According to the tests, at ring size 16, Triptych takes 49% of the time to verify as CLSAG, and 41% of the time to verify as MLSAG
20:44:41 <sarang> So twice as fast
20:45:06 <sarang> And there are more optimizations yet to come!
20:46:12 <dEBRUYNE> Would be fun to have a comparison to the original RingCT as well
20:51:07 <sarang> You mean... MLSAG
20:59:39 <moneromooo> With Borromean range proofs ?
20:59:57 <moneromooo> I suspect those timings are only for the signatures without range proofs.
21:01:02 <sarang> Correct
21:03:56 <dEBRUYNE> Ah, thanks for clarifying
21:04:02 <dEBRUYNE> Yeah I was referring to borromean proofs
21:36:50 <UkoeHB_> Does that imply they are comparable at ring size 32? (32 for triptych, 11 for clsag)?