10:32:55 <tevador> @hyc can you make a fixed version of https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/pull/195 ?
10:33:07 <tevador> if it's still needed
10:34:19 <hv-bridge> <\x> hyc: intel seems to be gonna actually doing this
10:34:20 <hv-bridge> <\x> https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8011325
10:34:32 <hv-bridge> <\x> >14 Cores, 20 Threads
10:34:37 <hv-bridge> <\x> 8 core alder with 6 core gracemont
10:34:38 <hv-bridge> <\x> 8c/8t + 6c/12t
10:44:35 <sech1> \x maybe 6 cores alder lake (6c/12t) + 8 cores gracemont???
11:04:58 <hv-bridge> <\x> that works out too
11:25:24 <sech1> tevador how is #211 working in randomx-benchmark and xmrig benchmark (correct hashes) but doesn't work in tests, I don't get it
11:26:10 <tevador> are you also getting a fail on test 84?
11:30:15 <tevador> sech1: it looks like the full dataset mode works, but JIT+cache gives wrong hashes
11:30:46 <tevador> try ./randomx-benchmark --verify --jit
11:31:48 <sech1> yes, it fails on 84 for me too
11:32:11 <sech1> ahhh I get it
11:32:19 <sech1> light mode?
11:32:25 <sech1> then it will certainly fail :D
11:33:14 <sech1> will submit a fix soon
11:38:27 <sech1> submitted
11:38:40 <sech1> xmrig probably has the same problem now :D
11:40:08 <hyc> people run xmrig in light mode?
11:42:10 <sech1> hyc they do sometimes: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/issues/2377
11:42:37 <hyc> I'll take a look at #195 now
11:46:52 <hyc> ok done as #213
11:55:16 <tevador> both merged
11:57:37 <sech1> since there are asm code changes, it would be nice to test it on linux too (I don't have any at hand now)
12:04:25 <tevador> I tested it on linux
12:04:45 <sech1> then it's all fine
12:04:53 <sech1> I tested the arm code on my phone
20:50:09 <selsta> tevador: I would like to update our submodule. could you tag v1.1.9 or should I just set it to latest master commit?
21:01:04 <tevador> OK, I will tag a release
21:11:57 <selsta> thanks