02:07:43 https://github.blog/2021-04-22-github-actions-update-helping-maintainers-combat-bad-actors/ 02:07:48 what a lazy workaround by github lol 03:12:14 total miners: 99326 04:00:40 wonder if the github countermeasures are responsible? 06:25:17 "pull requests from first-time contributors will require manual approval from a repository collaborator with write access before any Actions workflows run" 06:25:27 Good enough fix if you ask me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 08:51:37 was this abuse of actions for monero mining? 08:57:32 yes 09:18:02 <\x> yo sech1, xmrig benchmark page is down 09:18:09 <\x> Internal Server Error 09:18:19 don't worry, out best men are working on it 09:18:25 <\x> based 09:18:44 benchmark submission should still work 09:19:47 "< sech1> don't worry, out best men are working on it" that's what we were worried about. 09:43:33 fixed 14:40:57 asic mfr claims to have monero miner https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitwats-release-most-profitable-asic-195600764.html 14:46:24 https://bitwats.com/ 14:46:52 nothing on their site mentions actual hash algos 14:47:18 > Monero 2 MH/s at 550W 14:47:22 sounds unrealistic? 14:47:26 quite 14:48:34 first movers would be FPGA guys. they would all have working bitstreams by now. no one's talking about them because they all see they're nowhere near profitable 14:49:56 ... how long has it been since Linzhi-Sonia has been chatting in public 14:50:09 so the same asic that can mine BTC, ETH, LTC and XMR, right 14:50:10 scam 14:50:34 yep 14:50:56 BTC 360 TH/s @ 550W - 1.5 J/TH, 20 times better than Antminer S19 Pro 14:51:30 <\x> i read it as bi twats 14:51:34 and similar out of this world numbers for other algos, all for the same device 14:52:59 I wonder if people are still stupid enough to buy these things 14:53:11 you'd think most people have been burned enough times to be wary by now 14:55:05 new hype cycle new fools i guess 15:07:33 oooh 5nm 15:11:01 and their tech department is top notch I see: https://securityheaders.com/?q=bitwats.com&followRedirects=on 15:15:59 hyc, noobs are 15:17:43 also, gotta go for their GBT it is better efficiency - 5MH Rx @900W 15:19:03 or their top model - 15MH @2200w or about the power draw of a Vega64 for 2MH/s. 15:28:31 I'm sure they were "founded in 2016 by a team of technology leaders" who just didn't think about registering their domain until they picked it up from namecheap on Feb 24th this year 15:31:06 lol 15:31:17 mind if i tweet that 15:31:47 leaders, always leaders 15:32:29 gingeropolous: preferably without attribution - but knock yourself out. 15:32:43 indeed, i just put quotes around it 15:33:10 " the company has recently introduced its exquisite line of advanced ASIC miners" <-- so... what did they do before this? 15:33:59 Nice of them to have an actual email alias for complaints. 15:35:59 wow, shit, namecheap is responsive 15:36:01 "Hi, if you believe that a domain registered with us is involved in abusive activity, please report it to our Abuse team by submitting a ticket at https://support.namecheap.com/index.php?/Tickets/Submit You may also share the ticket ID with us then and we will prioritize it." 15:36:38 gingeropolous: namecheap will ignore your report 15:36:55 well, i enjoy screaming into the wind 15:36:58 reported multiple phishing sites to them and never heard back 15:37:21 asked a namecheap employee and the answer was that they get a lot of abuse reports so their team is overworked or so lol 15:38:22 just google bitwats.com and you get a long list of sites to insta-block for being pay-for-pressrelease 15:38:51 https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/mw9co5/bitwats_is_a_scam_beware/ 15:41:02 wonder why the poster deleted it 15:42:58 holy moly this press release gig is pretty good. bruneitribune? botswanaonlinenews? seychellesnewsgazette? arabnewsexpress? presslasvegas? ugandanewsreleases? LOLWTF 15:57:39 they also have a youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NK8x1deAZE on their youtube account registered on Arpil 18th 15:59:48 totally not stock video 16:04:46 this looks very familiar: https://www.btc.kz/resources/img/miners/m21s_spec.png?v=0.2 16:05:07 although that image ALSO looks like it has been poorly edited on the logo side