01:08:52 <gingeropolous> wow, 18.3% unknown
01:09:26 <gingeropolous> i think the clock has started ticking on the real test of asic resistance
01:10:13 <gingeropolous> switching to randomx in a sideways / bear market was sorta in a non-adversarial environment
01:10:49 <gingeropolous> i guess we'll have to rely on nonce analysis
14:45:53 <hyc> yeah I suppose incentives are increasing. success problems
14:47:04 <hyc> hm, that chart... overall, current profitability is still tiny
17:46:57 <sech1> Miners 101643
17:47:58 <gingeropolous> yeah, i don't undestand why it was more profitable with the GPU friendly algos
17:52:29 <sech1> Because github can't mine on gpus
17:58:05 <gingeropolous> is github mining?
17:58:32 <hyc> people are abusing github actions to mine, yes
17:58:55 <sech1> https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/mtb7bz/report_bot_mining_via_github_actions_vulnerability/
18:04:06 <gingeropolous> monero's gonna bring about the most secure era of computing ever
18:08:29 <selsta> github should just deploy https://github.com/tevador/randomx-sniffer
18:10:51 <gingeropolous> that would require competence
18:16:26 <sech1> they're not even blocking direct connections to known pools
18:22:23 <hyc> that would be a reasonable step, but easy enough to just point at a proxy or their own pool
18:23:08 <gingeropolous> well maybe some github insider is pro monero
18:23:14 <gingeropolous> and they're just letting it happen
18:23:30 <hyc> lol
18:25:40 <sech1> github = microsoft = azure at this point
18:29:15 <hyc> ironic to be running so many linux dependencies on m$ infrastructure
18:38:42 <NickvanSaberhagn> “<gingeropolous> yeah, i don't undestand why it was more profitable with the GPU friendly algos”
18:39:27 <sech1> Maybe it was more profitable because every PC has a CPU, but not every PC has a powerful enough GPU. Also, block reward was much higher before
18:39:31 <NickvanSaberhagn> Maybe because $/1kHash is not the same from GPUs to CPUs?
18:39:55 <NickvanSaberhagn> Ooo the block reward decrease. That’s a good point
18:40:14 <gingeropolous> yeah, but the dropoff was significant
18:40:21 <NickvanSaberhagn> I remember mining a block with my radeon that netted me 9 xmr
18:40:33 <gingeropolous> yeah, perhaps its the difference in "hash" between cpu and gpu
18:40:41 <NickvanSaberhagn> That’s what I’m thinking ginger
18:41:00 <gingeropolous> because 1 kh in Rx != 1 kh in CN
18:41:06 <sech1> dropoff was because algo changed
18:41:11 <NickvanSaberhagn> Indeed
18:41:33 <sech1> also, before the fork profit was 0.3 usd/day for 1 kh/s which puts Vega 64 at 0.72 usd/day
18:41:37 <sech1> not very impressive
18:42:02 <sech1> This is Ryzen 5 3600 level right now
18:43:36 <NickvanSaberhagn> Sech1: has the work on improving XMRig efficiency resulted in any PRs for RandomX? Like, perhaps finding redundancy?
18:43:56 <NickvanSaberhagn> (If I understand things correctly)
18:45:14 <sech1> I did a few PRs: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3ASChernykh
18:46:54 <sech1> https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/pull/166 gave the most speedup
18:56:26 <sech1> Miners 102163
19:25:40 <NickvanSaberhagn> Interesting thanks
20:11:03 <sech1> https://apollo.open-resource.org/flight-control/vfcc/dashboard/db/xmr-network-stats?from=now-24h&to=now
20:11:12 <sech1> oh my, looks at the yellow line
20:16:25 <hyc> that's ... interesting
20:18:32 <nioc> how can HR over 60 blocks move so much without HR over 120 blocks moving, the last little bit of the graph
20:18:36 <sech1> might be luck fluctuation
20:18:59 <sech1> 60 slow blocks + 60 very fast blocks = 120 normal blocks on average
20:21:47 <sech1> or maybe someone fired 1 GH/s solo for an hour or so
20:22:56 <selsta> feels like we have these short time fluctuations often