-
hycis it worth trying to add some optimizations from e.g. xmrig into monerod's miner?
-
hycI get the feeling the mutex overhead will already kill it so maybe not
-
hv-bridge<\x> itll be nice
-
moneromoooDefinitely worth it for changes that don't take much time to port.
-
moneromoooI assume there's big bang/buck ones and medium/small bang/buck ones.
-
gingeropolousi think its worth it. Currently solo miners using the daemon are at a disadvantage compared to running a 3rd party miner against their daemon. would be nice if they were the same
-
sech1Huge pages + MSR should reduce the difference to a few %
-
sech1xmrig has randomx_boost.sh to apply MSR mod separately
-
sech1randomx-benchmark + huge pages + MSR mod = 8220 h/s, xmrig = 8750 h/s, hmm... I though the difference would be smaller
-
hv-bridge<\x> sech1: tried emailing hwbot again?
-
hv-bridge<\x> xmrig randomx benchmarks on hwbot plez
-
hycnot sure how I feel about writing MSRs inside monerod
-
moneromoooIt could be made a non default option if it's got potential dangers.
-
sech1it can slow down other parts of monerod
-
sech1it's better to keep it separate
-
hycin that case there doesn't seem to be much to do on this front, in monerod itself
-
gingeropoloustotal miners 85000
-
gingeropolousminexmr.com 32.6
-
hv-bridge<\x> make the msr thing opt-in
-
hv-bridge<\x> the tweak affects some things, makes other programs slower
-
NickvanSaberhagnDoes adding msr increase the attack surface for an adversary?
-
sech1msr only works with root privileges so yes