15:26:39 total miners 76328 15:26:48 minexmr.com 36.7 15:28:13 what would be considered a safe oercentage? < 20%? 15:28:51 safe % what? oh the minexmr.com dominance? 15:29:19 yes 15:30:32 tough balancing act. it's in a pool's interest to be altruistic enough to keep the network healthy, but they still need to make enough income 15:32:49 i think they should just start raising fees 15:34:35 and some think that its nothing to worry about, as pools gain and loose favor over time. i mean, dominant player used to be crypto-pool.fr , and now they barely register 15:35:54 but recently some noob came in and was like "whats your nakamoto coefficient" and looks like they bailed on monero because its "controlled" by 3 pool ops 15:48:23 meh 15:54:03 Maybe if a pool adds merge mining, they'll get some custom. But then if they do, the big pools will end up doing it too so... 15:54:29 P2P would also help. But big chunk of work, for no clear gain. Maybe nobody will care/use. 15:54:38 s/P2P/P2Pool/ 15:55:36 yeah merge mining will be another shakeup. so far, it seems that monero pool distribution changes in response to PoW changes in general 15:55:55 though there's only been one instance of that , so... 15:56:33 sure the population overall had to have changed when shifting from GPUs to CPUs 16:41:12 empty block mined it seems: https://xmrchain.net/block/2312623 . 16:41:39 wonder if we're seeing block sniping or whatever its called 16:42:04 ah! it was supportxmr 16:52:20 It was a block mined 4 seconds after the previous one, mempool was empty 16:52:52 not according to my node :) 16:53:54 both were mined by supportxmr so their mempool was empty after the first of 2 blocks 16:54:14 ah 17:11:45 so close to 77k 19:25:47 77k what? 19:26:08 Miners 77086 19:29:17 Was it not like ~36k yesterday ? I claim counting methodology change. 19:32:16 maybe all the bullet-catching drones joined the network 19:40:01 No, the number has been growing slowly 19:50:47 also, those drones are not viable RX miners :)