-
gethhcloudy boy gone on all addresses at once
-
sech1nope, 2 addresses:
-
sech1
-
sech1
-
gethhwups :(
-
gingeropolous"Jahangiri’s announcement is the latest in Iran’s cat-and-mouse game with the country’s illegal crypto miners, who smuggle in rigs and are sometimes caught. " BUT MAH ASICS ARE GOOD AND PERMISSIONLESSSSSSSS
-
gingeropolous
-
hyclol
-
hyc3. The Block: Venezuelan Military Officials Seize 315 Bitcoin Miners
-
hyc
-
hycunlicensed miners
-
UkoeHB_How dare they run an algorithm without a bureaucrat's permission!
-
hycyes, the nerve of some people
-
moneromoooThat kind of arguments really annoys me. It's intellectually dishonest. Pushing it even further, it's like me stabbing someone then claiming I'm jailed to moving some atoms a bit.
-
moneromoooIt's a massive overgeneralization that does not apply.
-
UkoeHB_Who said it was an argument??
-
moneromoooI did. I was used many times before. A famous example is "the illegal number".
-
UkoeHB_Not sure how you can say so unequivocally that it doesn't 'apply', when that is just your opinion. In my opinion, bureaucrats are *in general* useless, licensing is *in general* ridiculous, and the intervention of the law into the private behavior of individuals interacting with other individuals voluntarily is *in general* unjustified.
-
gingeropolousim confused
-
selstawould appreciate a review on randomx functional tests: monero-project/monero #6111
-
selstaideally from someone who is familiar with randomx
-
moneromoooNo, it's unrelated to bureaucrats or licensing. It's the general technique of overgenerization. Here, mining is illegal. The technique generalizes it to "an algorithm", but only a ridiculously tiny fraction of algorithms are about mining. It's kinda like reductio ad absurdum.