03:12:28 <gingeropolous> since june 9th, this guy: https://xmr.nanopool.org/account/44BEHjxZWPFAY14Sen45qwShwX1m1RZw8FFgo9uY6A5FCnf3VBh7PS97Xr9FFxr6GXjXtv1Dgovfm8UW8A5aFhv23BfLLjM
03:12:33 <gingeropolous> 534 xmr
03:12:37 <gingeropolous> .usd
03:12:40 <gingeropolous> bah
03:13:17 <gingeropolous> $35k usd
03:13:55 <gingeropolous> so somehow getting 30 Mh - 100 Mh can be done for less than $35k
19:15:35 <sech1> Cloud miners got a big hit a couple hours ago, nanopool lost ~155 MH/s
19:49:09 <hyc> 10% of the network all at once?
19:49:59 <sech1> yes
19:52:48 <sech1> all 3 nanopool miners dropped most of their hashrate at the same time, so I think it's actually a single miner with 3 addresses
19:54:19 <sech1> they had 320 MH/s combined at peak, 20% of the network
20:32:30 <hyc> that doesn't sound like a good thing
20:38:10 <gethh> well it's just around 4-5MW of power, so either clueless cloud provider or what ?
20:38:38 <gethh> and that is based on most efficient rome cpu