11:06:10 hello people. is there a place i can get accurate and organized benchmarks for randomx? 11:06:23 i'm looking to see the h/s difference between a medium CPU and a good CPU/GPU 11:06:28 im currently looking at: https://1stminingrig.com/how-to-mine-monero-randomx-with-cpu-gpu/ 11:06:37 but i dont know if i should trust those numbers and it's just chaos in there 11:06:43 what is the standard place to look for benchmarks? 11:06:44 thanks! 11:08:03 asn https://monerobenchmarks.info/ 11:16:59 thx a lot sech1 11:31:10 sech1: do u have a suggestion on how to read that table? 11:31:27 because the way i read it i basically see that someone who buys the top CPU of the table can do 35k H/s 11:31:53 and then a good CPU will do u 9k H/s, and a decent CPU will do u 3k H/s, and then an OK cpu will do 1k H/s 11:32:10 is it really a 35x diff between the top and the OK option? 11:32:31 of course, the top costs like 7k$ wheras the OK costs 1k$ . plus the electricity diff 11:52:12 You can filter the table using "Search" field there. Just look for a specific CPU there 11:54:17 i dont have a specific CPU in mind 11:54:29 i was interested in the delta between top-end, medium-end and low-end 12:25:34 asn, yeah it is that much of a difference. amd's epyc processors are just really good at randomx. well, they are great processors in general, which makes them great at randomx. well, they are good multithreaded processors with a lot of on-die cache 12:38:58 asn: there are a lot of variables, but the important thing is that more cores (with enough cache) usually takes it away - and AMD have added a good deal of cache on their latest generation of CPU's, alongside lots of cores ... 12:40:23 and really, a threadripper 3970x does 35KH and costs like $2K while a 3900x for ~$500 should do 15-16Kh/s 12:43:49 i see 12:43:54 thanks for the info 12:44:31 basically what i see is that the delta between top-end and low-to-medium-end is about 35x 12:44:41 that is, top does 35KH and low-to-medium does 1KH 12:45:03 that's a better delta than other PoW funcs I've looked at (like equihash) 12:45:19 problems you might have in low end is few cores, little cache 12:45:21 of course i need to take $ into account, and threads and stuff like that 12:45:50 and currently you get more H/s with similarly priced AMD cpu's as compared with Intel CPU's 12:45:52 i was hoping that someone else would have done this for me for various PoW groups in a nicely organized way, but i cant find it 12:46:05 i see 14:30:08 AMD also beats Intel in H/W 14:30:19 and I tihnk narrowly beats ARM as well 15:21:49 it should beat Intel, at least on most skus 15:22:03 since they are just pumping more power at this point until they can figure their crap out