-
selstaxiphon: `v` prefix?
-
xiphonv0.15.0.3-1-g910aebe
-
selstaCFBundleVersion is only used internally so it doesn’t matter
-
xiphonSo drop it them
-
xiphon*then
-
xiphonIF it doesn't matter
-
selstaIt is used by the OS.
-
xiphonIf it does matter - do it consistent
-
selstabut I can drop it if you want.
-
xiphonI just want tit to be without v prefix
-
selstak will update
-
xiphoncause short version doesn't have one
-
xiphonOr we have to add 'v' prefix to short version as well
-
selstaThe OS adds Version before shortversion, it does not add anything to long version
-
selstathat’s why I have it like this
-
selstabut will change
-
selstaxiphon: updated
-
selstadoes indeed look cleaner when looking at the info.plist
-
xiphonselsta: thanks. Though MacOS dev docs require to use just "[0-9].[0-9].[0-9]" format for both
-
selstaYep, but I guess it’s only a recommendation. A lot of my installed apps use different format.
-
selstaAlso displaying v0.15.0 wouldn’t make sense for GUI :D
-
xiphonLeft another comment, seems MacOS will identify 0.15.0.3 and 0.15.0.1 as the asem version
-
xiphonNot sure whether it will lead to some problems or not
-
selstaI will look into how other apps handle it.
-
selstaIt should not be a problem considering how we had no version before but maybe there’s a better solution.
-
xiphon"It should not be a problem considering how we had no version before" -> yep, seems so
-
selstaall solutions I can think of are hacky
-
selstae.g. setting it to the amount of git commits
-
selstaor setting it to the current date
-
selstaxiphon: should I leave it like it is or do one of the above?
-
xiphonselsta: let's merge it
-
selstaI guess it would only get important when submitting to the appstore
-
selstaok
-
SnipaApologies for not getting a build to you selsta - While qmake is happy, I broke something else apparently. I completely get why GUI statics have been a PITA now. :)
-
selstaSnipa: no problem lol I know that static builds are complicated