03:45:59 are any of these ideas ready for the next fork? https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/6456 03:47:09 UkoeHB, knaccc 03:48:00 from what I can tell, the focus has been BP+ and a ringsize bump 03:49:16 though i might keep forgetting 04:15:02 not unless someone has been working to implement them 04:20:00 gotcha. But fundamentally, they are all sound? 04:37:54 yeah there are no outstanding objections I am aware of 13:07:07 wfaressuissia[m]: netstat -tunp: p requires an argument. 13:07:25 netstat -tun shows only unix domain sockets. not interesting for monerod. 13:07:31 I use netstat -nt. 13:07:43 I cannot see wfaressuissia[m] messages in Matrix, looks like there is an issue with his account. 13:08:13 Maybe not voiced or something? 13:09:02 this is after 2 days uptime https://paste.debian.net/1197339/ 13:09:36 all the TIME_WAITs are from xmrig polling the RPC 13:09:45 nothing unusual looking at the moment 13:11:08 er... all the 127.0.0.1:18081 TIME_WAITs are. there are one or two others from p2p 13:21:11 "netstat also showed hundreds of conns in CLOSE_WAIT" there must be some way to list active tcp sockets along with associated process pid 13:22:18 it's expected that dangling (without associated pid) socket can't be in CLOSE_WAIT state 13:23:31 in the worst case socket can be left unclosed until timeout of connection timer which is about few minutes 13:23:41 Hey messages :D 13:23:51 if you have a lot of sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state for along period of time then it's a problem 13:24:13 PID is not relevant here, there are no other active services on that machine. they are all due to monerod aside from my ssh session 13:24:34 otherwise it's expected that some of them will not be closed immediately 13:24:48 anyway, the last time I mentioned it the monerod had been up for 4 days when it started running out of descriptors due to this problem 13:24:57 this has now only been 2 days so far 13:25:53 PID will tell whether it's just non-terminated connection by monerod or some black magic problem in mac with CLOSE_WAIT state for dangling socket 13:27:14 sethsimmons: your messages aren't visible in #freenode_#monero-dev:matrix.org but visible in https://monerologs.net/monero-dev 13:27:55 I think it's due to the voice restrictions here. 13:27:58 On the IRC side 13:28:22 sethsimmons: i can see his messages fine and he's got voice 13:28:41 I can see wfaressuissia[m] now, not sure what changed 13:34:04 nothing changed. I was replying to his message from yesterday 13:35:26 oh 16:55:06 test 16:55:33 is the relay still working ? Matrix guys, anyone can read this ? 17:00:31 Yes, we can 19:39:07 .merges 19:39:07 -xmr-pr- 7349 7665 7666 7667 7668 7670 7677 7678 7680 7681 7682 7685 7686 7687 7688 7689 7690 7691 7694 7695 7696 7697 19:40:47 I hope that 7777 is not going to be taken by a spammer. 19:41:08 .merge- 7706 7689 19:41:08 Removed 19:41:20 luigi1112: these two might get replaced 19:41:32 by a more general fix so I removed them for now 19:41:37 7777 is very important agreed 19:41:52 are these tests still going to be testing what they claim, with all these result caching patches? 19:42:11 which one exactly? 19:42:17 we don't cache anything yet 19:42:20 regarding tests 19:42:42 ah you mean not merged ones yet 19:45:04 yeah 19:45:27 I will be careful with cache patches regarding tests (I won't be the one reviewing them) 19:47:52 this is the last place we want to add a bug and not notice broken tests 19:55:20 indeed 19:59:19 If a change is deemed safe, does not make things significantly more complicated and also has a noticeable speedup it should be fine to merge. 20:52:28 .merges 20:52:28 -xmr-pr- 7349 7670 7677 7678 7686 7687 7688 7690 7691 7694 7695 7696 7697 21:57:20 hyc, selsta, me and moneromooo have agreed, that the caching shall be disabled by default, and remain a developers' tool for local runs. 21:58:12 And this is the current state of the caching PR (7469) 21:58:29 Good night 21:59:08 mj-xmr: I think this was related to 7717 22:24:48 .merge+ 7689 22:24:48 Added 22:29:53 luigi1112: please ^ and then also gui today 22:30:15 and gui tag 23:25:19 guys can you help me out with something. Where exactly in the code is if 10 blocks have past since an input of a transaction was created using a prior output? 23:25:38 do you want to remove it? 23:25:43 it seems to me that there is no such check, only a check against the unlock time (which is different ) 23:25:54 and set by the user 23:26:05 No I want to understand the code 23:26:24 moneromooo: probably knows 23:28:35 seems like there is no rule like that 23:28:49 Not at the blockchain level, only the wallet level 23:30:29 (besides the user defined unlock time that is bundled with the tx) 23:36:26 git show a444f06 23:57:52 thanks a lot moneromooo