08:44:18 monero-wallet-cli now complains that index=n is invalid keyword (but it works as expected) 08:44:40 0.17.1.9 release 09:30:31 Inge-: could you open a Github issue for it? 09:55:36 Not currently I'm afraid. But it should be obvious to see when one is aware of it. seems to be consistent. 16:03:37 Is this ready to be merged, or does it need a final "Tick"? 16:03:38 https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/7000 16:07:59 Needs final approval as far as I can see 16:08:06 .merges 16:08:06 -xmr-pr- 7308 7309 16:15:16 OK. Does selsta want a beer? 16:15:56 7000 looks good to me 16:16:15 'Oddly, no one who was directly involved with the SIR-C missions and currently still working the Lab, remembers the name Howard Chu, except for one who vaguely recalls Eugene Chu as having a brother names Howard' 16:16:15 Ed Caro, NASA Chief Engineer. cryptogazette.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/1-768x1445.png 16:16:33 will test on my mac and then approve 16:16:42 thx! 20:01:01 .merge+ 7361 7362 7355 7352 7351 7343 7341 7339 7340 7332 7333 7331 7325 7319 7313 7312 7311 7294 7288 7284 7275 7273 7270 7265 7252 7242 7185 20:01:01 Added 20:01:31 moneromooo: could you please review / approve 7309? you approved 7308 (master equivalent) 20:02:17 mj-xmr: testing 7000 now, do you know why Github displays no changes when clicking on "force-pushed" ? 20:02:36 you did change something so maybe a github bug 20:03:18 I addressed your finding, namely I changed the span reference to pass-by-value. 20:03:44 yep, I did see that, that’s why I was confused that github says there are no changes 20:03:45 So the cause for the bug may be, that I don't use git push -f, but rather git push origin +BRANCH_NAME 20:04:09 Next time I will try the old way. 20:04:33 I understand that not being able to see the latest change is 1) confusing, 2) simply dangerous. 20:17:29 .merge+ 7000 20:17:29 Added 20:19:18 done 20:19:22 thanks 20:20:27 That list doesn't seem very chronological. There's a few 6xxx PRs. 20:21:55 ok, will go through the older ones too 20:22:35 * iDunk hopes 6810 will finally be merged 20:23:10 moneromooo: could you force push 6896 to run CI? it seems like it fails to compile on i686-w64-mingw32 20:23:23 undefined reference to `AcquireSRWLockExclusive' 20:24:00 I'd have done that blind by looking at the MS docs. 20:24:10 * moneromooo goes look again 20:27:03 Min version: either windows vista or windows server 2008. vista is now fairly old I think ? 20:27:40 I'm guessing circa 2008 ? :) 20:28:28 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/wADjFOEZ/ 20:29:24 The windows build passed though, looking at the CI list... 20:29:38 Oh, that's a link error, nvm. 20:30:16 depends 32 bit windows is failing, the 64 bit one seems fine 20:33:11 hyc: please review 6896 again, you approved it previously 20:36:19 (mooo did some minor changes to it) 20:39:46 Which I have no idea whether it'll work, I've just added the lib the MS docs say to the link line. 20:40:00 so someone needs to do an actual win32 build? 20:40:22 github is doing it. 20:40:39 ok cool 22:05:52 6896 probably fails because of https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L649 22:06:02 0501 is WinXP https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/porting/modifying-winver-and-win32-winnt?view=msvc-160 22:13:24 .merge+ 7349 22:13:24 Added 22:19:04 XP was before vista ? 22:19:25 Yes, ~2001, IIRC. 22:19:53 Vista is 0600, from that MS list. 22:23:18 I guess we could revert to mutexes (mutices ?) on win32. 22:23:30 It'd already mine like a pig anyway. 22:23:50 We support XP and Vista 0.o 22:24:51 32 bit build supports WinXP. 22:25:01 yikes 22:25:04 Why? 22:25:12 Just because it's easy, or some larger reason? 22:25:32 .merge+ 6877 6959 6986 22:25:33 Added 22:25:35 Both have been EOS/EOL for many years 22:25:56 The var was never updated ? 22:26:44 s/var/definition/ 22:27:03 Seems something that should be dropped to save some complexity but I know nothing about the details of it here. 22:27:16 Just hope we're not burning cycles on XP/Vista support or compat 23:22:08 I think my windows build VM is winXP64 23:22:31 but I haven't used it since switching to gitian build 23:38:52 0600 fixes 6896 here for release-static-win32 target (I also removed kernel32 from the link line). 23:40:55 BTW, all OSes below 0A00 are EOL, IIRC. I might be wrong. 23:43:30 Anyone against this ? 23:43:48 hyc: looks like you added this originally. Any particular reason, or just "might as well" ? 23:48:22 Guess it would KO any WinXP/Srv2k3 botnets. 23:51:06 Surely they don't use monerod ? 23:54:59 Right, but who knows... 23:57:40 well don't knock out botnets running full nodes on winxp/srv2k3 !!