10:53:26 hi 10:54:01 how can I statically link monero-cpp to a project and use RPC functions without having to run monero-wallet-rpc? 13:24:09 -xmr-pr- pavoltravnik opened issue #6860: `GLIBC_2.23' not found 13:24:09 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/6860 13:24:11 -xmr-pr- bjacquin opened issue #6859: release archive does not include supercop 13:24:11 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/6859 16:05:07 2;q 16:05:15 whoops ^^ 16:05:22 Roger. Launching. 20:22:34 so the IRS has a bug bounty out for Monero. Why does the Monero community not have a "catch and kill" fund? 20:23:09 a what fund? 20:24:24 like if someone can find a way to break Monero, there's a bug bounty 20:25:01 people keep saying $625K is not worth it to crack Monero but it's the highest bid and it's coming from the IRS 20:25:02 there is 20:25:07 it's on hackerone 20:25:16 well color me impressed 20:26:29 it's been for a couple years already 20:27:08 how much is it, compared to the IRS bid? 20:27:27 but IMO all of that is garbage. I'm a volunteer, writing for free. why should we pay someone who isn't doing the hard work of writing it? 20:30:33 nakedpony: I think the total is something like 1.5-2k Monero 20:30:46 Bounty size is based on the severity of the bug though 20:31:04 nice story "Feds up the bug bounty on Monero" 20:33:18 just a perverse incentive structure. it's always harder to build than it is to destroy. 20:33:50 but the "hackers" who tear things apart get the bounties and the glory... 20:34:25 I could and would have figured this out on my own, but wrongly assumed with such a low bid from the IRS that no one had such bug bounties set up. I can presume people going after the IRS bounty are behooved to have sought out this information and are now either going to keep the IRS money one way or another and later decide to cash in on the bug bounty 20:34:35 hyc you know what? that just ain't right 20:35:53 nakedpony: I think they are getting 500K for a believable attempt - and another 125K as a bonus if they get some .. not clearly defined .. success 20:40:30 One incentive model I don't think ought be replicated to Monero but I think is very... interesting. Is BISQ. At least the people working on the currency are getting compensated in the currency that they are investing their time and talent into 22:15:10 hi beautiful people. I am new to dev'ing on Monero. I am building a toy to familiarize myself with the code. 22:15:10 I added a new string field to the block header struct (call it test), but the get_block_from_blob() calls fail. In the BEGIN_SERIALIZE of the struct, I tried MAGIC_FIELD(test), but I'm not sure this is the proper way to serialize, and perhaps there are other things in codebase I need to change to serialize this properly. Any tips would be greatly appreciated! 22:23:21 maybe not helpful but looking at previous commits usually helps to understand this stuff 22:24:04 e.g. use git blame to find a commit that does something similar to what you want to do 22:27:40 FIELD(test) 22:28:04 yeah I had FIELD(test) before, MAGIC_FIELD(test) at least compiled 22:28:14 is the order of the declarations in the block header struct important? 22:28:25 Not really. 22:28:30 and thanks for the previous commit suggestion, that's helpful! 22:29:02 hmm yeah I did it like that, do you know what other files need to change for this all to work? It just looks to me like the whole block is turned into a string, then static cast back to a block 22:29:14 None. 22:29:23 really? that's surprising 22:29:36 I can show my logs of running in a private local test net 22:29:53 it just says like failed to verify block, and that the get_block_from_blob function breaks 22:30:06 I'll put it back in that state and post later 22:30:07 Obviously you can't then feed it existing blocks with the old format. JdKust in case you were doing that :) 22:30:41 yeah, I was mining, then adding a field before the handle_block_found function call 22:30:50 adding a string to my field* 22:31:40 should that be ok? I'll double check there are not other places I'm passing the old format in 22:37:12 oooo this might be because I assign the test string after the block passes into the constructor m_gbh(). Gonna try assigning it before then 23:07:14 luigi1111w: also please upload the v0.17.0.1 release notes and binaries, we want people to use this version: https://paste.debian.net/hidden/60fd4fac/ 23:08:02 hey moneromooo it totally worked once I made the above changes, thank you!