-
tevador
-
tevadorIs there a particular reason why subaddresses have a different network byte? Does the sender need to know they are sending to a subaddress?
-
moneromoooYes, the sender makes different crypto ops in that case.
-
sarangyes
-
tevadorOK, thanks
-
fluffyponyhyc: I was just thinking about your reply on that issue
-
fluffyponywe don't allow things like null CT proofs
-
fluffyponyso a soft fork to something like Bulletproofs+ would have to include the Bulletproof and then the Bulletproofs+ in tx_extra
-
moneromooovtnerd: fyi: monero-project/monero #6671 (you might have a better fix)
-
moneromoooI guess we might want to avoid that at some point if we add dandelion timeout functional tests.
-
vtnerdapproved that PR. its a tricky one either wa
-
niocbrrrrrras it was discussed a few days ago, when I send a dandelion++ tx it takes about 30 sec before it shows in an explorer vs <5 seconds before the update
-
moneromoooWheeee. Looks like the timeout is 173 seconds on average. Lots more than I expected.
-
moneromoooSo it looks like you're not hitting the timeout, but propagation is just slow...
-
sarang30 sec seems quite long
-
niocbrrrrrrsarang: the first time was around that but didn't measure and the second time I did
-
sarangIs there any good data on this that isn't just one time cases?
-
sarangI'm not disputing claims it could be longer than expected, but having a broader data set would be useful to assess this
-
niocbrrrrrrI can do a unch of sweep_all
-
niocbrrrrrra bunch
-
niocbrrrrrrshould get better as more people update to ++
-
niocbrrrrrrany idea how many have updated?
-
moneromoooIf Alice has not updated, she relays txes as normal, so it'd be faster.
-
jtgrassiexmrpow: yes