02:28:29 Hey guys, whats the best way to accept payments with monero 02:28:37 i dont want to use a service like coinpayments 02:29:05 and i saw that monero hasa RPC api that comes shipped with the node but it looks like its only one walletat once 02:49:13 actually i realized i can use paymentIDs 06:37:24 ezra: Make sure to use integrated addresses or subaddresses 06:37:29 long payment IDs have been depreciated 07:04:02 yes that is fine dEBRUYNE i understand 07:04:10 thats what i meant 07:04:13 just wording was bad 08:20:31 Does anybody see any issue with this? https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1004 08:21:23 If not i'll just ACK it. Makes sense to me. 08:22:22 Hey guys! I have quick question. Why do we seeding randomx hash with epoch start block hash? What did it made for? 14:37:24 who do i need to poke in order to get this request merged ?:) https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/147 15:00:16 naughtyfox: a seed hash is used so that the dataset doesn't need to be fully reinitialized on every hash 15:00:29 the dataset init time is on the order of several seconds 15:02:03 so that's not a security reason, right? just a speed up? 15:02:22 pricode: It first needs to be reviewed by the community 15:03:13 naughtyfox: pretty much. the epoch size, 2048 blocks, was chosen to be large enough to amortize the cost 15:03:34 without giving too much of a precompute advantage 15:03:59 why do you ask? 15:04:40 i was just watching the implementation and realized i gave the gap :) 15:05:10 just didn't understand what is it made for and decided to ask 15:05:35 i'm gonna read something about randomx inner workings. could you suggest sumething? 15:05:55 what is dataset for, for example 15:06:15 naughtyfox: https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/blob/master/doc/design.md 15:06:38 and specs.md goes into more detail 15:08:08 thank you 15:25:22 Does anyone remember what arguments were raised in opposition of encoding the restore height as word of the mnemonic seed? 15:25:32 It would add one additional word if I recall correctly 15:25:54 I remember it was briefly discussed a few years ago, but cannot distinctly remember why it was never implemented 15:28:18 I don't remember either - maybe before my time - but I just can't imagine how you could encode so many bits in a single word. 15:33:58 yeah, a single word is only worth about 11 bits 15:34:07 maybe 12 15:35:31 Could maybe do the first two or three and pad with zeroes? 15:35:36 * dEBRUYNE not sure if that makes sense at all 15:49:26 You don't have to encode the exact height, just a quantized low bound. 15:55:33 I think I made an argument for just making it an index of every 100k blocks 15:55:49 so 0 = beginning, 1 = > 100k < 200k etc. 15:55:57 sorry > 0 < 100k 15:56:00 you know what I mean