binaryFate: seems there is a error in updates.moneropulse.* dns TXT record

"monero-gui:install-win-x64:0.15.0.1.exe:55b4ac0b5131337ea7a7a66a7c6d4a277354a150c303bf70148ac284f6da5b9c"

^ the string should have no ".exe" extension

only fluffy can change DNS at the moment

:/

fluffypony: ^

hmm I should get access to that

my monero server is not genrating new address with RPC

anyone can guide me why

Did you change anything in the code ?

no

i am genrating address via RPC create_address

but its using old address instead of new address for every transaction

Are you sure this is a bug in monero ?

yes before that it was working fine

Then file a bug with the JSON you're sending the RPC, your exact monero version (commit hash), any command line switches you're using.

Also the log (run monero-wallet-rpc with --log-level 2).

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: Hey devs. Im wondering if any there are any paper looking ino the performance of bulletproof s vs account models? Does it have an effect on the performance/ tps of a network?

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: @Kayla they can hear me right?

account models?

Bulletproofs are a method for constructing general zero-knowledge proofs (like range proofs or circuit satisfiability proofs) with size efficiency; so I don't really know what the question means

In particular, a proving system does not necessarily imply a transaction model

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: I meant the private transaction system employed by Monero that uses bulletproof

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: The account model is a way of preventing double spends. Rather than having UTXOs it uses a balance sheet

like bitcoin?

Bitcoin uses UTXOs too.

I guess I dont see the difference

Cryptonite uses an account tree.

FWIW the general transaction model that Monero uses doesn't require Bulletproofs specifically, but I think that I get what you mean by the question now

I've only seen a few formally-analyzed "account model" type projects before

Are they comparable to Monero? i.e. use hidden amounts and so on?

I'm totally blanking on the name of a particular preprint right now

grrr

Quisquis is what I was blanking on earlier: eprint.iacr.org/2018/990

Ah interesting. My first reaction is it might get pretty chaotic trying to make new transactions while other people are making your addresses obsolete

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: Eth is the most notable asset utilising the account model

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: What exactly is a account tree?

I don't know the details, but basically associating a balance (rather than a set of outputs) to an address.

If you're interested, lookup "cryptonite" and "mini blockchain".

[discord] <Kayla#5718>: on, xcn, i remember that one 🙂

Common privacy-focused approaches use a TXO model (not really a UTXO in the same way...)

[discord] <Kayla#5718>: with pallas 🙂

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: How does Monero use an account tree if balances are private? And how is an account tree different from and account model?

Monero does not use an account tree. Cryptonite does.

^

Github down again :S

Oof: githubstatus.com

[discord] <Leo Cornelius [AIO]#9160>: I see. Cryptonite and cryptonote are different

Both of which are different from CryptoNight

simply delightful

soo any other comments on if we should do another point release before v0.15.1.0 ?

if not, moneromooo can you make a list of everything you want in v0.15.1.0? we will branch from master so I think getting as much in as possible would be a good idea

Well, pretty much everything.

agree

maybr luigi1111w can do another round of merges

so that we have a clearer picture of what requires a review

^ he has the list :-P

I have the list

did you check it twice?

luigi1111w: can you add monero-project/monero #6398 to your list to fix depends?