13:52:20 moneromooo: gitlab security release 13:53:40 Feel free to remind me from time to time, the repos have nothing new atm. 13:54:04 ErCiccione[m]: I have already upgraded it. I've received an email that advised me about security vulnerabilities. Thank you 13:54:32 ty 13:55:16 moneromooo: Do you have access to patch for the Hackerone anonimal was talking about? If yes, can you PR it so that it gets reviewed? 13:55:21 Hackerone issue 13:55:22 serhack: oh you have access too now. Cool, so i don't have to ping mooo every time :) 13:55:38 Doesn't ring a bell. Let me check fire up that VM... 13:56:44 Apparently there is 1 outstanding report that has to get fixed and a patch for it exists already. 13:59:00 Do you know what it's about ? 13:59:13 no 13:59:39 but anonimal asked me for a release because it would get disclosed next month. So maybe it’s an older issue. 13:59:49 I think I know the one. 13:59:55 I see the patch. 14:00:25 vtnerd: did you see the patch for the ahook tor issue, and are you ok with it ? 14:00:47 v0.15.0.5 would be ready apart from this patch. So once the patch is ready and reviewed we can tag. 14:00:59 we can also wait a few more days 14:01:09 .5 already ? 14:01:29 yes, GUI is at .4 so next release would be .5 14:01:33 else it would not make sense 14:03:48 I just read the patch again, looks good to me. If no reply from vtnerd (it's within his expertise) I'll PR it soonish. 14:04:42 ok sounds good 16:33:44 no, I missed that one will look at it later today 16:34:30 oh that, yeah I review that and my only recommendation were updating the tests 16:35:15 OK, I'll PR it in the next couple hours hten. Thanks. 18:02:46 moneromooo: can you also open against v0.15 branch? 18:05:00 Oh. Sure. 18:15:21 done 18:27:26 ty, vtnerd can you also approve 6373 18:47:52 builds aren't signed by Fluffy anymore are they? 18:56:45 question answered in #monero, plz ignore 20:51:19 moneromooo: should we add #6251 to v0.15 release? 22:00:43 Sounds like a good idea. 22:05:25 vtnerd: you talked about fixing something before the next release on the coffee chat, can you PR that now or is it going to take some time? 22:05:44 we plan to tag tomorrow / Monday 22:30:20 uh I may have to re-listen to my own voice to remember what I was referencing 22:30:44 I was probably talkin about d++ which isn't going to be in that release anyway 22:32:07 I think it was related to anonymity networks where it fails silently or so. 22:37:50 ah yes, log sgp's complaint about logging when you have zero i2p and tor peers 22:38:26 I will try to work out something right now, it would be log statements only so the review shouldn't be too bad