15:31:55 <SeventhAlpaca> Hi there, is it possible to set store-tx-info to 0 permanently (in the cli wallet)? I can set all other options permanently, but store-tx-info always reverts to 1 after saving and restarting the wallet... Thanks!
15:34:05 <moneromooo> It's a bug then. It's meant to be persistent.
15:35:37 <moneromooo> OK, I see what's going on. It's some backward compat name. I'll fix.
15:36:45 <SeventhAlpaca> thanks!
18:48:03 <Insight> so i was wondering, if block rewards are now standardized in the build im doing, can i just axe the out_amounts pointers?
18:49:31 <Insight> but i think it was pointed out yesterday that it was already being done with decompose_amounts_into_digits line
18:50:12 <moneromooo> I don't see the point.
18:50:17 <vtnerd> Isthmus moneromooo anybody else : would you happen to know the average relay time for a block or tx between nodes? asking for a friend
18:51:13 <moneromooo> I don't. There is no ACK so you'd need to have two nodes with logs and keeping close NTP.
18:51:31 <moneromooo> Connected but not on the same network.
18:52:22 <vtnerd> yeah, trying to determine the dandelion++ embargo timeout magic number
18:52:27 <moneromooo> Insight: removing them would break some tests which rely on old versions too.
18:52:33 <sarang> The folks in #noncesense-research-lab are looking into propagation and have taken data
18:52:45 <sarang> Not sure how much they can extrapolate their work to general nodes
18:53:14 <vtnerd> thats why I pinged Isthmus, but as you stated I wasn't sure if they could determine an invidual hop time
18:53:45 <vtnerd> the Bitcoin numbers are _probably_ close, but our latencies are going to be slightly different since the code is not copied
18:53:56 <Insight> yeah i figured.
19:16:18 <Isthmus> @vtnerd we have prop time estimates for the whole network but that's over an unknown number of hops
19:16:28 <Isthmus> relay time probably dependent on local topology
19:16:51 <Isthmus> I think that there are clever ways we could collect data to answer this question, however
19:17:37 <vtnerd> yes it depends on topology - the embargo timer is supposed to be slightly higher than the upper bound on the expected time to be fluffed
19:17:45 * Isthmus nods
19:17:50 <vtnerd> *expected time until fluffed
19:17:50 <Isthmus> Suppose we see from peerlists that node B is connected to node C
19:17:56 <Isthmus> And we attach an archival node on either side
19:17:59 <Isthmus> A--B--C--D
19:18:04 <Isthmus> Oh, hold on, incoming call
19:18:29 <moneromooo> LIFO.
19:21:14 <vtnerd> hmm, so if I mention his name again it preempts the call?
19:22:39 <moneromooo> Likely.
19:23:02 <moneromooo> Unless stack overflow I guess ^_^