10:13:50 <AMeMario> What is Tari?
10:20:39 <AMeMario> Monero inflation bug? boards.4channel.org/biz/thread/26234830
10:23:14 <AMeMario> Monero has inflation bug? boards.4channel.org/biz/thread/26234830
10:36:28 <sgewehr> What kind of person steals from own community?shorturl.at/jmDM4Your own leaders are laughing at how stupid you are for falling for thier 'Magical Crypto Friendship'.
13:06:17 <DosiaApriori> Hi I'm new here, I have idea (in next fork) if pool/adress found more than 50-100 blocks in last 1000 blocks. Then the award is NOT granted but is adding to next block award (the "no award" blocks is NOT count to 50-100 on 1000 ratio). What do you think? That will make pools size limit becouse big pools make less.
13:09:53 <jwinterm> DosiaApriori, then pools can just switch to different address after 49 blocks tho
13:09:58 <jwinterm> right?
13:10:23 <DosiaApriori> yea
13:10:46 <DosiaApriori> so good idea but not realy :(
13:10:54 <jwinterm> ye
13:12:29 <DosiaApriori> so is solution for this problem? i seen 40% share on top pool and think this is not great.
13:14:34 <wowario[m]> DosiaApriori: https://git.wownero.com/wownero/meta/issues/28
13:15:53 <DosiaApriori> is possible to make: if pool change adress then all miners have to change too?
13:20:39 <jwinterm> don't think so
13:20:48 <DosiaApriori> too bad
13:23:56 <DosiaApriori> somehow force miners in pool to mine on pool adress directly.
13:34:34 <ComplyLast> mine on small pools like pool.xmr.pt DosiaApriori
13:34:48 <ComplyLast> decentralization starts with you
13:35:15 <DosiaApriori> yea i'm changing now
13:36:09 <DosiaApriori> but i realize that, 1 mounth after start mining