01:06:39 <lh1008[m]> Hello everyone
01:09:56 <lh1008[m]> I have a two questions. How are CCS proposals being worked out? Are they discussed in a specific meeting or what should proponents do to push the proposal to funding? To answer part of my question I have been sharing it.
01:17:37 <kayabaNerve> lh1008[m]: Anyone can fork the repo and create a PR with a proposal following the template. Then you should get others to review it, updating your PR as you tailor it. Then, when it's accepted into the CCS (which I don't believe is tied to any event), you just need people to actually fund it.
01:33:09 <lh1008[m]> Okay cool, thanks. I already received a feedback and I haven't update it. Will do and keep on sharing.
03:10:45 <sgp_> lh1008[m]: the CCS proposals are under Core (mostly Luigi and Diego) maintenance. The proposals historically have been discussed during the MCW meetings for feedback
15:51:24 <msvb-lab> sgp_: Are you moderating a community meeting tomorrow? I don't have access to Github right now but want to request a agenda entry?
15:52:13 <sgp_> msvb-lab: out of the loop huh? :) rehrar will be handling the meetings from now on
15:54:34 <msvb-lab> sgp_: I am halfway out. I read things about control transfer, IRC community considerations, things like that. So now without all the information I know to ask rehrar.
15:57:21 <msvb-lab> rehrar (and others): Folks at the Defcon Redteam village (DC/RT) want to invite us (the general Monero community) to build a village for a online conference (usually physical in Texas) called 'Grayhat.' So I want to request a five minute duration during the meeting to find out if anybody wants to partipate in the October conference.
15:57:57 <msvb-lab> Title: Grayhat.co invitation, Duration: 5 minutes, Subtitle: Shall we enter a village proposal?
16:06:01 <lh1008[m]> sgp_: thank you. Tomorrow I'll be in the MCW meeting. :)
16:16:55 <xmrscott[m]> Ah yes, there is no MCW issue in meta FWIW: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues
16:17:19 <xmrscott[m]> s/issue/meeting issue
16:17:19 <monerobux> xmrscott[m] meant to say: Ah yes, there is no MCW meeting issue in meta FWIW: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues
16:17:41 <xmrscott[m]> If rehrar doesn't create one in the next 3 hours, I can so your request can also be reflected via GitHub msvb
16:18:35 <rehrar> did someone say rooroo?
16:22:33 <rehrar> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/503
16:23:12 <msvb-lab> Hello rehrar: Would you please add an agenda meeting for Grayhat?
16:23:16 <msvb-lab> Title: Grayhat.co invitation, Duration: 5 minutes, Subtitle: Shall we enter a village proposal?
16:23:41 <msvb-lab> It might not reach the level of importance needed to be included in our meeting, if you think that is true then don't make a agenda entry.
16:24:06 <msvb-lab> It is our last chance of getting permission to present Monero content at Grayhat (deadline on Friday in one week.)
16:31:15 -xmr-pr- [meta] rehrar opened issue #503: Community Workgroup Meeting: 29 August 2020 17:00 UTC
16:31:15 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/503
18:31:50 <dsc_> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24306511
18:34:57 <hyc> nice story
19:17:41 <dsc_> Ha, these google dorks:
19:17:45 <dsc_> inurl:https://www.chainalysis.com/ intext:bitcoin
19:17:50 <dsc_> inurl:https://www.chainalysis.com/ intext:monero
20:48:00 <Inge-> so not a single mention of monero?
20:49:51 <sech1> monero site:chainalysis.com
20:49:55 <sech1> gives 4 results
20:54:46 <xmrscott[m]> Don't worry, Monero's article is tomorrow
20:58:06 * sarang just joined this channel...
21:02:08 <needmoney90> msvb-lab: For future reference, making a comment on the weekly issue (https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/503 for this week) is the way to add things to the agenda
21:02:46 <xmrscott[m]> needmoney90: To be fair, it didn't exist at the time of their comment :)
21:02:58 <xmrscott[m]> (*IRC comment)
21:03:12 <needmoney90> That is true, but it is the normal way :D
21:03:38 <needmoney90> when do they usually get made?
21:03:52 <needmoney90> should we have a couple stubs up with TBA in the description?
21:07:40 <xmrscott[m]> In the past they got made anywhere between 24 hours to a week in advance by Mr. J
21:08:10 <sgp_> yeah I was sometimes lazy
21:08:17 <sgp_> s/sometimes/usually
21:08:17 <monerobux> sgp_ meant to say: yeah I was usually lazy
21:08:30 <xmrscott[m]> Now that Core owns it they can just make issue templates for it: https://docs.github.com/en/github/building-a-strong-community/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository
21:08:55 <xmrscott[m]> *issue MCW meeting template in Meta anywho
21:09:12 <xmrscott[m]> Core should probably do the same for MRL
21:09:14 <xmrscott[m]> meetings
21:12:00 <sarang> ?
21:12:12 <sarang> I post agenda issues for MRL weekly in `meta`
21:12:19 <sarang> What needs to change with that?
21:14:10 <xmrscott[m]> I'm just saying it could be easier on you if there were templates that had the boiler plate stuff, so the only thing you'd really need to do is set the "When"
21:15:28 <xmrscott[m]> So when you go to create an issue, you just select 'MRL Meeting template' and it's 90% filled out. Rather than having to search a closed issue and copy/paste
21:16:46 <xmrscott[m]> It would also make things more scriptable in terms of scrapping meetings by somewhat guaranteeing a standardized syntax everytime
21:17:07 <xmrscott[m]> Should there ever be a meeting IRC bot or what have you
21:17:24 <sarang> meh
21:17:35 <sarang> I mean, we do always use the same template
21:17:45 <sarang> but it takes like 30 seconds to copypaste
21:17:50 <sarang> If someone wants to make a template, sweet
21:17:55 <sarang> If not, no big
21:18:53 <selsta> it would look like this https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/new/choose
21:19:03 <selsta> you can select a template and also link to other support resources
21:19:33 <needmoney90> If we script it then rehrar will be out of a job
21:22:04 <sgp_> I haven't seen someone link mpv player in forever
21:22:11 <needmoney90> also moderation is stupid hard to script
21:22:16 <needmoney90> offtopic, moving on etc
21:26:25 <selsta> I guess goal would be that the script posts the log automatically to github + website, not to moderate
21:26:32 <selsta> though a moderating bot would also be interesting :P
21:28:15 <xmrscott[m]> Yeah, back when I worked uni IT the IRC bot had pretty basic commands
21:29:01 <xmrscott[m]> Largely !next would give the time of the next meeting, !list would list the next occurance of all team meetings (*nix, windows, etc)
23:03:00 <msvb-web2> needmoney90 Yes, I'm always doing it the correct way with agenda requests, but asked on IRC today as an exception (lacking ability to access GitHub.)
23:03:34 <needmoney90> Got it